Under Sanders, income and jobs would soar, economist says

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
do you ever have anything relevant or minimally intelligent to add?

Yes. Do you? If so, please do so now. We've waited far too long.

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
So welfare recipients should return their bennies?

considering the pentagon budget dwarfs individuals' welfare as does corporate welfare, bitching about individuals getting help that's needed is retarded

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

ttystikk said:
Now you understand why we leave them for Uncle Buck to chew on.

You don't leave it for Buckhead to "chew on". You really have no control over your lying, do you?

Rob Roy · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
it's not fallacious, it's a fact. we need clean water, good roads, schools etc. that means everyone chips in for them. why can't you grasp that fact?

no, no one has more rights than others. society would be a lot more equitable.

it's way past time to admit the current system is grossly unfair and most of all, it's not working

Your middle sentence is reasonable.

Your other two sentences imply that only thru coercion good things can occur. Of course you are wrong there, since you deny the bad means you would use to create the desired outcomes.

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
Yes. Do you? If so, please do so now. We've waited far too long.

we? i really doubt you speak for anyone here. sign of an overlarge ego there ace

Rob Roy · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
considering the pentagon budget dwarfs individuals' welfare as does corporate welfare, bitching about individuals getting help that's needed is retarded

Perhaps you can then explain why Bernie has repeatedly voted to FUND the pentagon?

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
considering the pentagon budget dwarfs individuals' welfare as does corporate welfare, bitching about individuals getting help that's needed is retarded

Well, YOU said " those that benefitted". You defined the class, not me.

Rob Roy · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
You don't leave it for Buckhead to "chew on". You really have no control over your lying, do you?

Careful if you point out his hypocrisy too often, he will runaway and slam the door!

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Rob Roy said:
Your middle sentence is reasonable.

Your other two sentences imply that only thru coercion good things can occur. Of course you are wrong there, since you deny the bad means you would use to create the desired outcomes.

why do you still live here then?

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
Well, YOU said " those that benefitted". You defined the class, not me.

context son.....context. you brought up welfare recipients

since1991 · Feb 10, 2016

ttystikk said:
Now you understand why we leave them for Uncle Buck to chew on.

Where is ole Uncle Buck anyways?.....we got some critters fer him to gnaw on

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
we? i really doubt you speak for anyone here. sign of an overlarge ego there ace

Ahh, you assume you represent "anyone here". There are three looking at my screen right now, so "we" is the proper term. I won't even comment how you tried to imply you represented "those intelligent members of society".

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Rob Roy said:
Perhaps you can then explain why Bernie has repeatedly voted to FUND the pentagon?

why do you live here?

Rob Roy · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
why do you still live here then?

I am a free person. Who has the right to tell me to leave ?

You and I already agreed none of us have superior rights to others didn't we?

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
Ahh, you assume you represent "anyone here". There are three looking at my screen right now, so "we" is the proper term. I won't even comment how you tried to imply you represented "those intelligent members of society".

that's because you weren't there the day your teacher taught reading comprehension. i don't assume i speak for anyone.

i doubt you have 2 other people with you that you didn't burn up

got a light?

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
context son.....context. you brought up welfare recipients

No, you said "those that benefitted". Welfare recipients clearly benefited. You try to change the definition of words AFTER you use them. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own definition of words.

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Rob Roy said:
I am a free person. Who has the right to tell me to leave ?

You and I already agreed none of us have superior rights to others didn't we?

dude.....seriously...........where did i tell you to leave?

i've heard the bundy crew has an opening.............

Red1966 · Feb 10, 2016

Elwood Diggler said:
why do you still live here then?

You complain about the status quo. why do you still live here?

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
No, you said "those that benefitted". Welfare recipients clearly benefited. You try to change the definition of words AFTER you use them. You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own definition of words.

so should farmers, grocers etc give back the money they got because of the welfare recipients? there's nothing wrong with my words unless you have a learning impairment

Elwood Diggler · Feb 10, 2016

Red1966 said:
You complain about the status quo. why do you still live here?

your answer is all over these threads son.........no one but the 1% is content with the society we all live

Under Sanders, income and jobs would soar, economist says

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member