U.K. Law Changes Today

welsh wizz

Well-Known Member
Cannabis law change 'illogical'



Story of a former Cannabis user


The reclassification of cannabis as a Class B drug has come into effect in England and Wales amid complaints the new laws are "illogical".
Ministers went against their advisors to upgrade the drug because of worries about its impact on mental health.
Magistrates welcomed the reclassification but said planned fines for possessing small amounts undermined the more serious classification.
They said it sent the signal cannabis is not as bad as other Class B drugs.
Plans to introduce a "three strikes" system for cannabis possession start with a warning, then an £80 spot fine for a second offence. Scotland and Northern Ireland have opted out of this penalties arrangement for England and Wales, retaining the former system for class B drugs.
Only when a third offence is committed, will the person be liable to arrest and prosecution. Penalties for drug offences

The spot fine proposal is due for further consultation after magistrates expressed concerns about taking offences away from the courts system.
The Magistrates' Association argued that some of the offences were too serious to be dealt with out of court and that penalty payment rates were low.
The fines are to be debated in the Lords on Monday and are expected to come into force on Wednesday.


Currently, police can only warn or prosecute people caught in possession of cannabis.
The maximum prison term for possessing cannabis rises from two to five years with its reclassification.
Home Office minister Alan Campbell said: "Cannabis is a harmful drug and while fewer people are taking it than before, it poses a real risk to the health of those who do use it."
He added: "We are reclassifying cannabis to protect the public and future generations."
But John Fassenfelt, deputy chair of the Magistrates' Association, said the fine system would send out mixed messages.
"What is that telling the youngster on the street?" he said.
"Is it telling them well, you can have cannabis, it's not so serious as other Class B drugs.
The reality is cannabis has been illegal for 80 years and it has made no difference whatsoever to its usage



Liberal Democrat MEP Chris Davies






"It's a dual justice system. If you smoke or take another Class B drug you'll be brought to court, if you take cannabis you'll be given a fine. Where's the justice in that?"
But Liberal Democrat MEP Chris Davies said the changes were disproportionate to the harmfulness of the drug and that they would in any case be ineffective.
He told the BBC: "The reality is cannabis has been illegal for 80 years and it has made no difference whatsoever to its usage... The use of cannabis should be a matter of health policy not criminal law.
"The principle of a free society is that people should be able to do whatever they like as long as they cause no harm to other people."
Brian Paddick, a former Metropolitan Police commander, also said the upgrade would be ineffective as the classification of a drug was not a factor drug users take into consideration.
However Debra Bell, who says her son became aggressive and dishonest after first smoking the drug aged 14, told the BBC the age of users is falling and the damage to families is acute.
'Three times stronger'
She told the BBC: "Thousands across the UK who have written to us have talked about the damage to families... our children are our future."
A £2.2m TV, radio and internet campaign will launch next month to warn young people about the dangers of using the drug.
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith decided to reclassify cannabis despite an Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs' review - commissioned by Gordon Brown - saying it should remain Class C.
Ms Smith said stronger "skunk" varieties account for 80% of the cannabis seized on the streets, and that the drug is nearly three times stronger than in 1995.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said: "The move to Class B has got nothing to do with public health and education and everything to do with posturing on penalties.
'SKUNK' CANNABIS
So-called because it has a very strong smell
Three times stronger than other types of cannabis
Contains much higher levels of the active ingredient - tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).
Now accounts for between 70% and 80% of samples seized by police
Six years ago it accounted for 15% of samples


"This farce would have been avoided had ministers heeded the advice of the experts on the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs."
The advisory council's report, Cannabis: Classification and Public Health, described the drug as a "significant public health issue".
But it said it should still remain a Class C drug, saying the risks were not as serious as those of Class B substances such as amphetamines and barbiturates.
Class C includes substances such as tranquilisers, some painkillers, GHB (so-called "liquid ecstasy") and ketamine. Possession of Class C drugs is treated largely as a non-arrestable offence.
The Conservatives have said the government's reversal of its earlier decision showed the downgrading of cannabis had been a mistake.











PENALTIES FOR DRUG DEALING AND POSSESSION

Drug class Type of drug Possession Dealing Class A Ecstasy, LSD, heroin, cocaine, crack, magic mushrooms, amphetamines (if prepared for injection). Up to seven years in prison or an unlimited fine or both. Up to life in prison or an unlimited fine or both. Class B Cannabis, amphetamines, Methylphenidate (Ritalin), Pholcodine. Up to five years in prison or an unlimited fine or both. Up to 14 years in prison or an unlimited fine or both. Class C Tranquilisers, some painkillers, Gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), Ketamine. Up to two years in prison or an unlimited fine or both. Up to 14 years in prison or an unlimited fine or both Source: Home Offfice

 

Wild

Well-Known Member
So all those youngsters that have tried herb and thought nothing of it, will now start to think, well, Amphetamines are no more dangerous! Apparently, we should all quit smoking herb then and move onto Tranquilizers, because they're in class C and therefore prove no risk to our health. However, kids at 13, admittedly are abit too young to smoke regularly in my opinion, but the only way to stop that is to decriminalize.
Does anybody know if the new laws make any difference to growing penalties?

If you watch that 'my son is a violent weed smoker' on the BBC site, it seems really scripted, the lad just repeats what the gov say are the 'facts' on 'Skunk'
 

welsh wizz

Well-Known Member
How can any good come out of this shambles? My own view is that the safest and fairest thing to do with cannabis is to regulate and control it, to sell it in shops with proper pricing, packaging, warnings, and taxation, and to take the profits and control right away from criminals. This has to happen one day. We cannot go on with this system of prohibition that feeds crime and harms us all. Today's shambles, by showing that our government does not act for the benefit of its people, will not take the advice of experts, and cannot even create a stable and workable legal framework, may just bring the end of prohibition a little closer.
 

cookin

New Member
yeah man sucks, thing is moving it from c to b means no difference in the limit of time for dealers on for possesion. hopefully police will still use a bit of common sense though. yeah just watched that link somewhere on here about the evil weed on bbc which was good but points out from studies on rats that people who smoke under 15 years old will probably have problems later on, but around about 15 and above not really, keepin it blackmarket on that basis is ridiculous.
 

ruderalis88

Well-Known Member
So, who loves Professor David Nutt?
Drugs legislation in the UK is a joke, i'd get in more trouble for having a few spliffs than a gram of ketamine. and ketamine's about a million times more likely to make me die. Ridic. Good Thread.
 

stoner79

Member
So, who loves Professor David Nutt?
Drugs legislation in the UK is a joke, i'd get in more trouble for having a few spliffs than a gram of ketamine. and ketamine's about a million times more likely to make me die. Ridic. Good Thread.


i love professor david nutt!! :bigjoint:
finally someone standing up to that arsehole government labour and their shit head cronies that no nothing about real life "on the street",science and just about everything us people in the real world have to live with,
come step in my shoes gordon brown,i'll show u the real world....dickhead!!!
are we realy living in a free society?
so if i grow my own,smoke my own, who am i harming? who's the victim?
surely all them "legal" highs are alot worse! why arent they all banned as well if cannabis is so "dangerous"?
it just maddens me that a plant that has grown for thousands of years can be illegal!!
how can something that grows out the ground be illegal???
we even all have receptors in our brains and body that are wired up for cannabis use!!


wat a crazy fucked up world we live in.............:wall:
 

ruderalis88

Well-Known Member
i love professor david nutt!! :bigjoint:
finally someone standing up to that arsehole government labour and their shit head cronies that no nothing about real life "on the street",science and just about everything us people in the real world have to live with,
come step in my shoes gordon brown,i'll show u the real world....dickhead!!!
are we realy living in a free society?
so if i grow my own,smoke my own, who am i harming? who's the victim?
surely all them "legal" highs are alot worse! why arent they all banned as well if cannabis is so "dangerous"?
it just maddens me that a plant that has grown for thousands of years can be illegal!!
how can something that grows out the ground be illegal???
we even all have receptors in our brains and body that are wired up for cannabis use!!


wat a crazy fucked up world we live in.............:wall:
right on pal. snap crackle pop, crazy crazy world! most of the political system is just shit, the country's practically run by unelected civil servants who don't know their own arses from a teapot.

labour i hate, tories i hate, lib dems are an utter non-entity, but g brown i feel kinda sorry for cause all he's ever wanted was to be PM and when he finally gets there it turns out he's totally crap at it. That's gotta be a right guttor, still doesn't give him an excuse to continue fucking the place up though. He should just resign and count his chickens and then write a book about how Blair was shit. Sorted.

Prof Nutt is a total lege. How good a title is "drugs czar". took balls of steel to stand up and say exactly what anyone who knows about it was thinking. the problem with politics is that it's all about politics though, not what's actually right for the people. It doesn't matter who you vote for cause the government always gets in.
The other scientist guy who was kicking about last week, might've been on newsnight or something, he was cool too. Interviewer asked him if what Nutt was saying was right and he was just like "eh...yeah. scientifically he was spot on, there's loads of evidence etc. jst maybe it wasn't a good idea to actually SAY it though"

Personally I think they should legalise most things and just regulate and tax the shit out of them. Least then the semi destructive habits we have will put money into society as well as being seriously entertaining.
Let's gang up on them and pump the Commons full of ganja smoke, see how they think when they're all nicely toasted.
 

welsh wizz

Well-Known Member
We went to war with Iraq on bull shit, so reclassification of cannabis dont need facts.:cuss:

But I want to know what the gov expected to happen with the reclassification, all the ganja smokers rush to their GP and get hooked up with tranquilizers as they are much safer,:wall: safer like shit.

No they think it will win them more votes!

Up the revolution theirs no one worth voting for.:bigjoint:
 

ruderalis88

Well-Known Member
We went to war with Iraq on bull shit, so reclassification of cannabis dont need facts.:cuss:

But I want to know what the gov expected to happen with the reclassification, all the ganja smokers rush to their GP and get hooked up with tranquilizers as they are much safer,:wall: safer like shit.

No they think it will win them more votes!

Up the revolution theirs no one worth voting for.:bigjoint:
true dat

i say dissolve the UK and let Wales an Scotland do what they want.

Down with Westminster!
 

stoner79

Member
We went to war with Iraq on bull shit, so reclassification of cannabis dont need facts.:cuss:
:
that so true!!
lets send hundreds of men n women to their death because there "might" be wmd's, none of which were found!!
the people running the worlds countrys are a fuckn joke!!

why is the government so afraid to legalize cannabis?
surely by now the hemp plant must be one of the most tested things on the planet and they still cant decide!!
facts are alcohol and tobacco are far more dangerous, do more harm than good...fact! everyone knows this,
so why all the fooking about with cannabis??
health issue's is just away of buying more time, all it realy boils down to is money!!

alcho companys profits,tobacco companys profits,medical company profits will prob go down significantly,
the governments tax take on all the above mentioned goods will be hut as well, they know and we know it!

if them fuckn half wits that are suppose to be running the country realized that the millions of pounds of tax payers moneys they pump into "fighting the war on drugs" every year was spent else where on proper things like hospitals and education, they would actually save money and put a big dent in gang's untaxed profits,
free up the police to fight proper crime,clear out the jails for proper criminals instead of incriminating people that would rather get their buzz from a joint or watever their into rather than alco or tobacco!

i live in hope that the younger generation making their way thru the political ranks can see the damage prohibition is doing to the people of this world,
but do any politicians actually live in the same world as us??

i guess not...............:dunce:


ps who the fook elected gordon brown to run the country??
when tony blair quit...( funny how he bailed out just before the economy fucked up...strange??)
there should have been an election, so we have an unelected,clueless idiot running the country,
nice of him to fast track us into europe without even getting a say on the lisbon treaty!!
i hope i see an uprising from the people, why do we sit and take this crap??
may be 2012 might be right, and end of this political madness!!!!!!
 
Top