Thought I would see how we deal with this issue.

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Old study that failed to create appropriate controls. Next. Low income... read: smokers, drinkers and the like included.




You pulled up a garbage study with garbage methodology. There's been exactly one study where the subjects weren't exposed to other drugs as well by and large and it was a cultural one done long ago.
This actually got me thinking...what about all the women who DON'T confess their sins? Surely there is a number of women, who are not drug addicts, that have used during pregnancy and not said anything because,after all, it is illegal.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
We were doing so we'll keeping it on the rails! Let's kiss and make up and keep the MATURE conversation out of the shitter!

Thanks,
The Management
 

bigbuddin84

Well-Known Member
And in case you are wondering why I say you fail at comprehension, which im SURE you are, ill do one last favor and lay it out for you as my last post in this thread.

You STILL seem to think that I am on one certain side of this argument, which I have stated several times, that I am not. Read the thread again. You wont see me on any side.

I was merely pointing out that PEOPLE LIKE YOU are biased. And in fact you are so biased, you will argue to the point where dont even know what you are arguing about anymore, which can CLEARLY be seen in your posts. I was never on a side here. Read a few more times, maybe it will sink in. Probably not
 

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
And in case you are wondering why I say you fail at comprehension, which im SURE you are, ill do one last favor and lay it out for you as my last post in this thread.

You STILL seem to think that I am on one certain side of this argument, which I have stated several times, that I am not. Read the thread again. You wont see me on any side.

I was merely pointing out that PEOPLE LIKE YOU are biased. And in fact you are so biased, you will argue to the point where dont even know what you are arguing about anymore, which can CLEARLY be seen in your posts. I was never on a side here. Read a few more times, maybe it will sink in. Probably not
Actually, you insulted my educated view and claimed I was an ignorant biased stoner. Again, go fuck yourself idiot.
 

nsbudca

Well-Known Member
indoctrinated? I wouldnt be on here if I was that brainwashed. as a responsible HUMAN being you try to reduce all these outside influences.

getting high when pregnant is not being responsible, nor is the junk food that follows. Now if youre a person that justifiably has medical issues its a little different.

majority of medical users are just recreational users with an excuse.
You think cancer is an excuse? You think that it's an excuse that my anxiety is so bad that I will stay up worrying for days? Or that I won't partake in family outings because I'm to worried that I'll get in a car crash and die? Or that I won't swim because I can convince myself I'm going to drown if I go near a lake? Yeah..I live my life like this so I can smoke pot legally...jesus Christ...you have no idea what people go through on a day to day basis. Are some mmj patients people who just paid a doc for a signature? Yes. Not a huge majority or whatever the hell you said. The largest number of Canadian patients have cancer, chrones, epilepsy, aids or dehabilitating chronic pain. I also didn't know that being a dietician made you a cannabis expert.
 

Velvet Elvis

Well-Known Member
in USA majority yes.

cancer patients, or people with legitimate fully diagnosed disorders are not the type I speak of.
 

CannaReview

Well-Known Member
Getting a little snippy with humour this morning? When did you decide it was your call as to whom was permitted to get pregnant? We weren't talking about YOUR kid, and other peoples kids are none of your business. Not everybody does, nor should they have to, share your opinions or morals. I'm not saying you are wrong, just that the other side is equally valid. And if you think med users are simply rec users with an excuse...try walking in my shoes for one day. I long for the days when I only used for fun.
Its a public forum discussing a subject, if you don't want peoples opinion on it don't post it on a public forum and you if can't handle other peoples opinion on said subject don't read the posts. There's an ignore button when you click on my name, click it so next time you're not offended by my own opinion.

I don't give a flying fuck who gets pregnant and even goes crack when their pregnant, if I'd had the means to help that person not do it while they were pregnant I'd help them out. If its my wife/gf that wants my baby but she has not intention on quitting dope while she is pregnant I sure as hell will not get her pregnant.

As for the rec users vs med I think you got my confused with someone else...
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Its a public forum discussing a subject, if you don't want peoples opinion on it don't post it on a public forum and you if can't handle other peoples opinion on said subject don't read the posts. There's an ignore button when you click on my name, click it so next time you're not offended by my own opinion.

I don't give a flying fuck who gets pregnant and even goes crack when their pregnant, if I'd had the means to help that person not do it while they were pregnant I'd help them out. If its my wife/gf that wants my baby but she has not intention on quitting dope while she is pregnant I sure as hell will not get her pregnant.
As for the rec users vs med I think you got my confused with someone else...
Actually,Canna, you replied to my post (a attempt at married/parent humour) with a snotty "Well if she can't handle her addiction/cravings for 9 months then she has no business getting pregnant especially if that is my kid." I was talking about cravings,KFC and ice cream, FFS. What does that have to do with addiction? I did not mention your kid, I don't know if you even have one. I don't care, this isn't just about you. I can take peoples opinions just fine, it's the asshole-ish comments I get annoyed with. Sorry for the rec user vs. meds...that was meant for velvet elvis
 

nsbudca

Well-Known Member
in USA majority yes.

cancer patients, or people with legitimate fully diagnosed disorders are not the type I speak of.
Well this is the Canadian patients thread. So watch what you say. You didn't say that in the first place.

Anyways you might know a lot about dieting but you don't know much about cannabis...especially Canadian patients...
I'm just going to leave this alone..you're stressing me out..I'm getting anxious..I need to medicate....
 
Top