PetFlora
Well-Known Member
There's two kinds of engineers; one kind calculates, the other kind actually thinks.
It isn't hard to tell the difference.
why is it when you have nothing of substance to say, you still feel the need to chime in?
There's two kinds of engineers; one kind calculates, the other kind actually thinks.
It isn't hard to tell the difference.
The type with mixing chambers, not the usual ones you find for fish tanks and gardens?I've done the venturi thing, too
The ones that think.Some can do both![]()
Someone needs to rebut your incessant bullshit.why is it when you have nothing of substance to say, you still feel the need to chime in?
I’ve seen most of your grows on here and yes your right they do look like shit, but yes shitty looking plants can still get you stoned, I’ve grown a few lol. But, when growing indoors the ideal is to optimize the cycle to get the most with the least amount of energy and this is where IMO you have failed. I do give you credit though for posting what I consider subpar plants that show what doesn’t work. Waterfalls work very well and grow, for most that try, really nice, big plants. I’m not sure what your agenda is with this persistent O2 generator thing but until you have it in hand and get it up and running (you said a couple of months, a month ago btw) why are you talking/promoting about it in multiple threads, I just don’t get the why. It’s somewhat reminiscent of J Henry ..... I cringe at that name lol.
Someone needs to rebut your incessant bullshit.
For example, you've yet to prove any of your underlying assumptions, such as why or how dissolved oxygen levels over 100% are A. possible to maintain or B. beneficial in any measurable way.
I'm not the one making unproven assertions.Right back at ya
I'm not the one making unproven assertions.
Keep calculatin'
Was that in this thread?For example, you've yet to prove any of your underlying assumptions, such as why or how dissolved oxygen levels over 100% are A. possible to maintain or B. beneficial in any measurable way.
Was that in this thread?
I hate to burst bubbles and I'll try help anyone do anything but.....
That's wayyyyyyyy past the point of what's considered saturation, actually its beyond the point of supersaturation.
Levels of dissolved gas approaching supersaturation are toxic to plants, not a benefit
Bias and Ignorant, really?
Who's the person attempting to assist you?
With that one statement you've entered no further help from me
If youre referring to the hydrolosis video above i did watch it and it reminded me of the blurple LED fad advertising.
If hydrolosis were a viable economical solution it would be used in industry. I've just about 25 years experience in industry and can tell you that if your aim is to raise DO to supersaturation you are the ignorant one.
Isnt aeroponics the way to increase the oxygen and uptake?
And the general health of the Grow is still much more important than the nutrient delivery method.
I offered observations and asked legitimate questions and you respond with name calling. Not once did I say it does or doesn’t work. I’m just curious as to why you don’t perfect what you have rather than search for a magic bullet. Clearly your plants are subpar, again in my opinion, and there is lots you could do with what you have to improve things. You seem to have many environmental things to over come before moving onI cringe at JH too, but that doesn't mean he was wrong. Clearly, he did not know how to get his point across, and well all the jackals came out to crush him, much like they do me. Maybe it's you lot who are invested in waterfalls and bubblers. Science and Technology marches on in spite of those like you lot
But to all the Jackals, until you've actually grown with it, all you offer is OPINION based on NOTHING. Why do you protect your bit of knowledge on DO so furiously?
Don't think I haven't noticed that none of you commented on my last grow (post #9)?
That said, I do understand that relative information has been very difficult to find, and while this video may not convince you, it convinced me. I ordered a 2020 yesterday
And not that I owe any of you a reason for when I start my next grow, I may be going away for a week in early October, and if so, will wait until I get back
I was going to reply to this part earlier and got sidetracked.You've only been here a few months, you don't have a grow to show your knowledge, and yet here is your arrogant post to identify yourself: " Times i may not give the whole story when replying, just enough so that folk don't mess up their grow, some digging or experiments will help
What you seem to be 'OFFERING" is censorship
Speaking of time here and stupid/ignorant (yet again lowering yourself to name calling, a theme with you), you’ve been here what? 8-9 years and still growing sub par plants. How can anyone take you seriously? When things go bad (and they always do) with your plants and others have tried to help, you get all defensive, and yup, start calling people names. Why do you do that? Hopefully my spelling and grammar is fine, I know that also sets you off into a name calling tirade lol.clearly, you didn't bother to watch the video and what credentials/science/research do you have to suggest your knowledge ion this subject as superior?
You've only been here a few months, you don't have a grow to show your knowledge, and yet here is your arrogant post to identify yourself: " Times i may not give the whole story when replying, just enough so that folk don't mess up their grow, some digging or experiments will help
What you seem to be 'OFFERING" is censorship
you all keep proving your bias and desire to remain ignorant, which equates to stupid. And you can't fix stupid
If you really wanted to help, you would say, hey he could be on to something. either way, let's sit back and see