The Ghost Of George Washington

ChChoda

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
He would have taken lee's position.
Click to expand...
"I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than the dissolution of the Union. It would be an accumulation of all the evils we complain of, and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation."


Col. Robert E. Lee, U.S.A. in a letter to his son Custis, January 23, 1861

A very proud man!







"But lest some unlucky event should happen unfavorable to my reputation, I beg it may be remembered by every gentleman in the room that I this day declare with the utmost sincerity, I do not think myself equal to the command I am honored with."

Washington's formal acceptance of command of the Army (16 June 1775)

A very humble man!
 
Mindmelted

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
ChChoda said:
"I can anticipate no greater calamity for the country than the dissolution of the Union. It would be an accumulation of all the evils we complain of, and I am willing to sacrifice everything but honor for its preservation."


Col. Robert E. Lee, U.S.A. in a letter to his son Custis, January 23, 1861

A very proud man!







"But lest some unlucky event should happen unfavorable to my reputation, I beg it may be remembered by every gentleman in the room that I this day declare with the utmost sincerity, I do not think myself equal to the command I am honored with."

Washington's formal acceptance of command of the Army (16 June 1775)

A very humble man!
Click to expand...

And yet lee fought for the south and his state of virginia.The same as washington would have done.H e would have condoned the secession of the south just for the unfair taxation reason alone.And then to invade his state with military force would have made him side with the south even more.
 
ChChoda

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
And yet lee fought for the south and his state of virginia.The same as washington would have done.H e would have condoned the secession of the south just for the unfair taxation reason alone.And then to invade his state with military force would have made him side with the south even more.
Click to expand...
It's out of context, but absolutely applicable.

George Washington to George William Fairfax
31 May 1775

excerpt-

"Unhappy it is though to reflect, that a Brother's Sword has been sheathed in a Brother's breast, and that, the once happy and peaceful plains of America are either to be drenched with Blood, or Inhabited by Slaves. Sad alternative! But can a virtuous Man hesitate in his choice?"

http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/documents/revolution/letters/gfairfax2.html
 
Mindmelted

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
ChChoda said:
It's out of context, but absolutely applicable.

George Washington to George William Fairfax
31 May 1775

excerpt-

"Unhappy it is though to reflect, that a Brother's Sword has been sheathed in a Brother's breast, and that, the once happy and peaceful plains of America are either to be drenched with Blood, or Inhabited by Slaves. Sad alternative! But can a virtuous Man hesitate in his choice?"

http://gwpapers.virginia.edu/documents/revolution/letters/gfairfax2.html
Click to expand...


Your so focused on the slave thing.

We are not talking about slaves.

We are talking about if washington would have fought for or sided with the south.

Slavery was wrong and is still wrong today(Which it still goes on in africa and other places)

And the south was not the ones bringing in the slaves to market.It was all greedy yankees ships doing that.But that besides the point.Washington would not have tolerated the invasion of virginia,Period.
 
ChChoda

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
Mindmelted said:
Your so focused on the slave thing.

We are not talking about slaves.

We are talking about if washington would have fought for or sided with the south.

Slavery was wrong and is still wrong today(Which it still goes on in africa and other places)

And the south was not the ones bringing in the slaves to market.It was all greedy yankees ships doing that.But that besides the point.Washington would not have tolerated the invasion of virginia,Period.
Click to expand...
You really don't know your history. That's all. Seriously, you need to read a couple more books on American history, actual historical accounts, before you become a channeler of Presidents and Generals.

Start here:
P.G.T. Beauregard
 
Mindmelted

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
ChChoda said:
You really don't know your history. That's all. Seriously, you need to read a couple more books on American history, actual historical accounts, before you become a channeler of Presidents and Generals.

Start here:
P.G.T. Beauregard
Click to expand...

Do tell almighty know it all.

Enlighten me with your unsurmountable knowledge on the subject.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top