panhead
Well-Known Member
You must not have children,correct ?
TEEN GROWERS ages 13-17
- Thread starter keyserweezer420
- Start date
badman2424
Well-Known Member
i think that might b my kid who started this thred?
SayNoToDrugs
Well-Known Member
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
yeah, the little icon at the top of your screen that says "bookmarks". if he goes to his kids computer and checks it it may have rollitup on there. get it? it was funny.huh? you can check ppl's bookmarks?
SayNoToDrugs
Well-Known Member
I dont have kids but im not sure what i will tell them about pot? Does anyone here actually not care if their kids smoke or grow?
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
yeah, the little icon at the top of your screen that says "bookmarks". if he goes to his kids computer and checks it it may have rollitup on there. get it? it was funny.
sorry, ill go in the corner nowlol, i didnt read what you quoted, just what you wrote. so i got the impression you could check his bookmarks...... im tired, ive been up for 18 hours. lol peace
panhead
Well-Known Member
I do not care if my oldest son smokes but i do care if he grows, because in my state its a death sentance,plus he's a very responsible adult who's allready finished his education.
My objection to youngsters using any drugs or alcohol is that they need to be thinking clearly at all times while their brains are still growing.
Shits different then when i was a kid,back then you could get a job at a factory or construction on every street corner, & be well paid,nowdays you'd better have your shit together & have some education or your the last in line in most cases.
lol, i didnt read what you quoted, just what you wrote. so i got the impression you could check his bookmarks...... im tired, ive been up for 18 hours. lol peace
you should get stoned and take a nap. that's what i do.
boooky
Well-Known Member
I dont have a kid but I would imagine if he/she started smoking pot I would be the last person to judge them for it..I would rather him/her ask me for some weed other then getting robbed/shot/stabbed buying it off some punk trying to dig in peoples pockets.
Us as people need to tell ower kids what we do and what we stand for, it starts with the kids. Its not some evil crack on the street ruining familys the famillys are allready ruined before the drug was involved. Hiding it from your children and then them finding it is worse then just telling them. They find it they might not tell you and tell everyone else they know because they think its bad because you have been hiding it for so long.
Lets teach ower children about this plant we love not hide it from them like the government they need to know. They need to know what it is and what it stands for or everything we have worked so hard for will die off with us.
SayNoToDrugs
Well-Known Member
I hate smokin and goin to sleep, it makes me feel like i wasted weedyou should get stoned and take a nap. that's what i do.
primeralives
Well-Known Member
no way... you have to smoke befor sleeping... im actually about to fire up the vape
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
good idea, will doyou should get stoned and take a nap. that's what i do.
SayNoToDrugs
Well-Known Member
You couldnt have said that better, you got my vote. Run for president man! Then have a grow operation in the white house! haha
SayNoToDrugs
Well-Known Member
What state do you live in if you dont mind me asking?
I cant honestly be a death sentense, not in the US.
primeralives
Well-Known Member
im prety sure he was being sarcastic, he probally lives somewhere like me where you can get 10+ for growing
primeralives
Well-Known Member
panhead
Well-Known Member
I was being dramatic,but not by much.
Having from 1 plant to 19 plants in my state is a 4 year felony plus a $20,000 fine,there is no such thing as a lessor fine,you will get the max fine then if your lucky enough to get probation they'll make surre you pay atleast another $10,000 in fees for all the bullshit classes they make you take,then they suspend your drivers liscense to boot,the mother fuckers
By the time they use you as a cash register for several years,over a joint,then they'll turn you upside down ,like on cartoons, & shake every last red cent out of your pockets,then & only then will you be allowed to get on with your life,not until your flat broke,homeless & taking the city bus because they confiscated your car will you be allowed to get off the wheel.
In my state the marijuana laws are about extorting revenue for daily government operations.
User24
Well-Known Member
Amorality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Amorality is the quality of existence that moral right and wrong (or good and evil) are incompatible. 'Amorality' or 'amoralism' may also refer to believing that the concepts of moral right and wrong do not have meaning, or lacking a belief in the absolute existence of any moral laws.
"Amorality" is different from "immorality" although they are often confused. An amoral person denies the existence of morality, as opposed to an immoral person who violates a certain moral code, but may still believe in the underlying truth of that moral code. Amoral persons either do not possess ethical notions at all as a result of upbringing (see Antisocial personality disorder) or else do not subscribe to any moral code. This latter may in turn mean strong individualistic leanings that do not get codified into a universally applicable system. Someone may maintain that he will do as he likes and let others do the same, if they so desire, without turning this into a general principle as, for example, Kant's categorical imperative would require. Because whoever says so only expresses his personal preference or informs about the way he is going to act, the position is consistent. An amoralist might also make a stronger point that moral systems are arbitrary and unfounded on the whole, which is an epistemic or anthropological claim and not an ethical one. For this principled sort of amoralist, see OpenDNS, Daniel Quinn and to a degree Marquis de Sade.
"Immoral" refers to a person or behavior that is self-consciously within the scope of morality but does not abide by its edicts. A thief will not deny that stealing is immoral, but would perhaps attempt to deflect the blame or offer excuses in order to justify his actions, either to other or to himself. A more sinister kind of immoral individual might even derive pleasure from "breaking the rules". An amoral individual, on the other hand, would see the entire issue as moot; an excuse would only need to be offered if it resulted in the danger of punishment being averted. Essentially, immoral individuals believe that certain things are wrong, but disregard this information, possibly resulting in feelings of guilt. An amoral person believes that the concepts of right and wrong are irrelevant, with one view consisting of the idea that right and wrong are subjective concepts, and determined entirely by personal preference. Thus, guilt is meaningless in an objective sense. In common use "amoral" and "immoral" are often used interchangeably, although the meaning of the terms is significantly different.
Amorality is the quality of existence that moral right and wrong (or good and evil) are incompatible. 'Amorality' or 'amoralism' may also refer to believing that the concepts of moral right and wrong do not have meaning, or lacking a belief in the absolute existence of any moral laws.
"Amorality" is different from "immorality" although they are often confused. An amoral person denies the existence of morality, as opposed to an immoral person who violates a certain moral code, but may still believe in the underlying truth of that moral code. Amoral persons either do not possess ethical notions at all as a result of upbringing (see Antisocial personality disorder) or else do not subscribe to any moral code. This latter may in turn mean strong individualistic leanings that do not get codified into a universally applicable system. Someone may maintain that he will do as he likes and let others do the same, if they so desire, without turning this into a general principle as, for example, Kant's categorical imperative would require. Because whoever says so only expresses his personal preference or informs about the way he is going to act, the position is consistent. An amoralist might also make a stronger point that moral systems are arbitrary and unfounded on the whole, which is an epistemic or anthropological claim and not an ethical one. For this principled sort of amoralist, see OpenDNS, Daniel Quinn and to a degree Marquis de Sade.
"Immoral" refers to a person or behavior that is self-consciously within the scope of morality but does not abide by its edicts. A thief will not deny that stealing is immoral, but would perhaps attempt to deflect the blame or offer excuses in order to justify his actions, either to other or to himself. A more sinister kind of immoral individual might even derive pleasure from "breaking the rules". An amoral individual, on the other hand, would see the entire issue as moot; an excuse would only need to be offered if it resulted in the danger of punishment being averted. Essentially, immoral individuals believe that certain things are wrong, but disregard this information, possibly resulting in feelings of guilt. An amoral person believes that the concepts of right and wrong are irrelevant, with one view consisting of the idea that right and wrong are subjective concepts, and determined entirely by personal preference. Thus, guilt is meaningless in an objective sense. In common use "amoral" and "immoral" are often used interchangeably, although the meaning of the terms is significantly different.