Google, really? You say its been proven, but as a bio major that has taken substantial amounts of chemistry and admittedly not nearly as much physics, I've read the exact opposite of what you're saying in numerous international subject references and scholastic journals. I asked you to do the same and you still haven't. Google henry's law. Or combined gas law. Pressure and temp can change solubility (amount of solute able to be dissolved into solvent). Surface area can change the rate of solution, and nothing else.
I have yet to be rude to you and legally is the first person ive ever gotten into a retarded internet argument with that was of a personal nature. You and I were in the middle of a technical disagreement when legally chimed in then got pissed that I didn't change my mind for him. I stand by everything I've said, and until somebody presents actual fact from a scholastic source with the evidence to substantiate their claim, I will not tell every internationally recognized chemist that they're wrong. Will you?
We do seem to be chasing our tails. That's why I broke down your most inclusive post and disproved each point one at a time. But instead of getting a response based on the discussion, I got this:
This thread is a great example of why I spend little time on this site anymore.
You try to help out but then inevitably you spend your time trying to convince some douche nozzle the realities of the situation. Woodsman is an extremely experienced grower who knows his shit front and back and yet douche #4,567 --Mike91sir feels the need to line by line debate him on the information that in my experience is accurate and correct.
Allow me to summarize the results of the test for those that can't seem to get a grasp on things..
The big take away? don't be a cheap fuck, buy quality gear and check that off the list of things that can go wrong.
He even said it was in HIS experience. My points are based on the experience of thousands of government-funded scientific studies.
Instead of both of you worrying about telling me to leave to find information that supports your THEORY, why don't you both spend a couple days reading some physics/chemistry references from a library and come back and tell me HOW you can PROVE that I'm wrong. Evidence is the basis for all scientific fact, and neither of you have given me any. Despite the numerous pieces of actual scientific evidence based I've brought into this discussion, I'm still just the asshole who won't shut up, right?
I'm happy considering every problem I ran into, including a blown ballast mid-flower, failing a/c during summer in SoCal, recurring mite infestations from the start, soil acidity issues, etc. A first time grower diagnosing, treating, and curing all those problems, still getting prime quality nugs. My bad for not wanting to veg longer so I would have gotten more yield, I wanted to be smoking it before the year was over. As I have medical problems resulting from my time in the military, I do depend on the medicine's painkilling abilities and didn't want to pay top dollar at shops for hit-or-miss quality. So yes I will keep doing what I'm doing, which doesn't involve shipping back retarded (and retardedly expensive) products that I myself proved would have no benefit prior to their purchase. And if you're going to spout shit from your dicksucker about my skills, why look at the first month of my growing time? How about you take a look at what I'm doing now and what I learned in one grow??
