Police Interactions.

bam0813

Well-Known Member
Whatt statement was false ? Canna? You a meth head? Or just that incurable TDS? Lets make up its valentines
78910B45-4893-43A0-9F28-511589A81123.jpeg
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Your reply simply confirms the saying that violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.

There are politicians seeking ways to improve public safety that also reduce police brutality and murder. Your broad brush statement was false and you posted a fantasy of violence against Canna for saying so.

I see you as being a potential ally in the cause of reducing police brutality but clearly you seem to have no answers other than more violence.
he and the others who are in his circle don't want a reduction in violence. they're quite happy with the way things are going.
the police continue to murder minorities, arrest them for stupid reasons, physically abuse them while they have them in custody...
this helps perpetuate the racial divide that they use as a propaganda tool to "prove" to their kids that anyone who doesn't look like them must be bad people...That white people must be superior, "look, we don't live in these kinds of conditions, in these kinds of areas," without ever acknowledging that most of those areas and conditions are the direct result of racism in our government, down to a local level.
They'll never admit the effect that something as simple as the placement of interstate ramps can have on a minority neighborhood. local planners purposely placed on and off ramps directly over and through many nice, successful minority areas, mostly because they didn't want minorities to have nice homes or successful businesses...
But i must be lying, America has never had a problem with systemic racism...my mistake, carry on....
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
he and the others who are in his circle don't want a reduction in violence. they're quite happy with the way things are going.
the police continue to murder minorities, arrest them for stupid reasons, physically abuse them while they have them in custody...
this helps perpetuate the racial divide that they use as a propaganda tool to "prove" to their kids that anyone who doesn't look like them must be bad people...That white people must be superior, "look, we don't live in these kinds of conditions, in these kinds of areas," without ever acknowledging that most of those areas and conditions are the direct result of racism in our government, down to a local level.
They'll never admit the effect that something as simple as the placement of interstate ramps can have on a minority neighborhood. local planners purposely placed on and off ramps directly over and through many nice, successful minority areas, mostly because they didn't want minorities to have nice homes or successful businesses...
But i must be lying, America has never had a problem with systemic racism...my mistake, carry on....
Yes, Democrats are so divisive for objecting to that behavior. We cant even get away from that shit online.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/02/19/qualified-immunity-is-burning-a-hole-in-the-constitution-00083569

The hairsplitting can be extreme. In Baxter v. Bracey, an appeals court granted qualified immunity to officers who released their police dog on a burglary suspect who was sitting down with his hands up. Although a prior court decision had held that it was unconstitutional to release a police dog on a suspect who was lying down, the court in Alexander Baxter’s case granted qualified immunity to the officers because, it held, the prior decision did not clearly establish the unconstitutionality of the officers’ decision to release a police dog on a person who was seated with his hands in the air.

In Jessop v. City of Fresno, police officers stole $225,000 in cash and rare coins when executing a warrant. Prior cases had held that it was unconstitutional for officers to steal, but those cases were factually distinct — involving the theft of different types of property under different circumstances. According to the appeals court, the officers “ought to have recognized” that it was wrong to steal the coins and cash, but “they did not have clear notice that it violated the Fourth Amendment” because prior court decisions “did not put the constitutional question beyond debate.”

What a fucking racket...They should open a murder for hire business, they can get away with it...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Technology making black people rich and exposing pieces of shit, the cops need to pay a share and price for this kind of bullshit, personally. Cellphones and copcams have done more for the rights of black people than the laws and made more than a few of them rich, at taxpayers' expense. It's not their fault this shit costs taxpayers so much money, it's the fault of racist and unfit out of control cops.

Yeah, they do this shit to suburban white soccer moms all the time... Let me guess, some white person called 911 because black people in a car were acting suspiciously and guess who shows up and what happens next, while the racist asshole who called laugh their ass off sitting in the restaurant. Works every time like magic.

 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
There are lots of good cops but when the few bad ones do bad things it reflects on the group as a whole. The hope (for me) is that given the spotlight now on the bad ones, the good ones will prevail. In my 62 years I’ve only encountered 2-3 assholes but I’ve always been respectful. I’m sure if I was of colour my attitude might be a bit different towards LEO. My encounters with US border guys has been anything but cordial lol.
 

GenericEnigma

Well-Known Member
There are lots of good cops but when the few bad ones do bad things it reflects on the group as a whole. The hope (for me) is that given the spotlight now on the bad ones, the good ones will prevail. In my 62 years I’ve only encountered 2-3 assholes but I’ve always been respectful. I’m sure if I was of colour my attitude might be a bit different towards LEO. My encounters with US border guys has been anything but cordial lol.
You're lucky.

Where I grew up, the cops were pure hell. I had no point of reference, so I assumed all cops were fascist fucks.

A few years after I moved away, the chief was arrested for smashing his wife's head into the bathroom tile floor. Shortly thereafter, another force member was removed for corruption. Two more were caught abusing detainees.

My first experience with cops was terrible. I fell asleep on a park bench at 16 years old and they thought I was the biggest threat. Never been in trouble, looked like everyone else, but they thought I was drunk and fucked up (good kid at that point, never touched a thing). Had guns drawn on me. Was told I should be taken into the station, but I would just be taken home - at which point I, at 16, finally lost it. "Take me in," I told them. "Do it now. Let's get this cleared up!" "Well, no, we don't need to do that." I sat back and folded my arms in disgust.

Fascist fucks. Give 'em some power, put them behind the Blue Shield - and they're all corrupt by association.

When cops start turning each other in for corruption, and quit lying for each other - what am I saying? ROFL
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus

hanimmal

Well-Known Member

Their explanation for doing it seems perfectly reasonable. But they are whitewashing that there are clear examples of them using the same kind of troll tactics to sway politics as the dictators of other nations attacking our citizens.

This is why I would like to see a google type quasi-government entity to be able to push back on them and show the clear examples that are going to far and actually have the power to do something about it in real time, while being able to help contribute to the development of new tools to actually do great things like helping our police across the nation maximize how they do things.

I still think every cop on the street should have full access to their home base with people sitting back watching their backs and providing nonstop support. And zero paperwork on their end, if there is a full recorded record of all their time on the job, then there is no point for them doing paperwork. I also do understand the need to make sure that their departments are not being subject to disinformation, but that would also be something that they would get help on, meaning that every tax dollar that police department is spending is going on helping those communities they are in.

Also on a side note, im not sure that Mayor Adams is not a left-troll. Which is a bummer.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member

Their explanation for doing it seems perfectly reasonable. But they are whitewashing that there are clear examples of them using the same kind of troll tactics to sway politics as the dictators of other nations attacking our citizens.

This is why I would like to see a google type quasi-government entity to be able to push back on them and show the clear examples that are going to far and actually have the power to do something about it in real time, while being able to help contribute to the development of new tools to actually do great things like helping our police across the nation maximize how they do things.

I still think every cop on the street should have full access to their home base with people sitting back watching their backs and providing nonstop support. And zero paperwork on their end, if there is a full recorded record of all their time on the job, then there is no point for them doing paperwork. I also do understand the need to make sure that their departments are not being subject to disinformation, but that would also be something that they would get help on, meaning that every tax dollar that police department is spending is going on helping those communities they are in.

Also on a side note, im not sure that Mayor Adams is not a left-troll. Which is a bummer.
is he left?
 
Top