then why do you spend so much effort quoting marxists, and defending the marxist systems which you feel were "good" (mainly due to their hypothetical nature) with only vague dismissals of those which were demonstrably evil?
i have been reading various commentaries and essays by Orwell, and i was surprised to discover that he was in fact a utopian communist, with a passion for "pure" marxist ideology, but like Bertie Russel, opposed Bolshevism for it's lack of ideological purity, and Fascism for it's nationalism and chauvinism.
as both Bertie Russel and now, (to my chagrin, since that means you were "right" on that issue) George Orwell were BOTH ardent believers in Marxism, how can you pretend that you do not adhere to Marxism, when in fact you
seem to only be offended by Bolshevism and it's close relative Fascism?
you are clearly not a Communist, since a Communist would be horrified at the prospect of forcing another to adopt Marxist ideology, and while not a Bolshevik, you do subscribe to many of the plans and methods approved by Il Duce for his fascist variety.
the vagueism which shrouds your actual beliefs like a magic cloak is poor defense against those who you so frequently quote, and prop up as symbols of your own mysterious agenda.
since you refuse to delineate your position, i must therefore conclude that you are hiding it for a reason, and that reason is most likely, a strong vein of discredited Fascism or Bolshevism, or possibly even wacky Maoism running through your real belief system.
this would tie in closely with your perplexingly adamant refusal to even mention the Zapatista Marxist Insurgency currently operating in the country in which you reside.
the Zapatisas are notoriously Maoist, with close ties to Shining Path and several other marxist guerilla organizations south of the border, so i am given to conclude that you are in fact a Zapatista agent provocateur operating in secret to destabilize the comfortable tourist trade in baja.