Obama's Power Grab to Gain Control of Private Property

One thing I've noticed is Kynes gives you real world examples from history to back up his reality while you insist the academia theory is reality. You disregard historical practice of your theories while embracing those same theories spouted by someone else.

Kkkynes thinks Marxism is synonymous with socialism.
 
You are so obsessed with Marx. I am not talking about that shit at all. I have to repeat this in every post because you are such a Marxist. The Soviet myth has done so much damage.

"But on the other hand it was of the utmost importance to me that people in western Europe should see the Soviet régime for what it really was. Since 1930 I had seen little evidence that the USSR was progressing towards anything that one could truly call Socialism. On the contrary, I was struck by clear signs of its transformation into a hierarchical society, in which the rulers have no more reason to give up their power than any other ruling class." -George Orwell

and yet, bertie russle, (your usual preferred critic of bolshevism) was only pissed at the bolsheviks for their FAILURE to adhere to marx's plan religiously.

orwell was a fan of socialism (ye olde tyme type, commonly called Proto-Communism) insofar as it promised fairness and equality for all, yet even he knew you couldnt trust it to the apparatchiks or the "Intellectual Vanguard" because, human nature being what it is, they would resort to oppression, suppression and violence to maintain their power and derail the utopian fantasy.

orwell was a utopian dramer, and sometimes you seem to be on etoo, but NOT when you so vigorously defend your clearly Marxist ideals with lies about Marxism.
 
Cool story bro.

then why do you spend so much effort quoting marxists, and defending the marxist systems which you feel were "good" (mainly due to their hypothetical nature) with only vague dismissals of those which were demonstrably evil?

i have been reading various commentaries and essays by Orwell, and i was surprised to discover that he was in fact a utopian communist, with a passion for "pure" marxist ideology, but like Bertie Russel, opposed Bolshevism for it's lack of ideological purity, and Fascism for it's nationalism and chauvinism.

as both Bertie Russel and now, (to my chagrin, since that means you were "right" on that issue) George Orwell were BOTH ardent believers in Marxism, how can you pretend that you do not adhere to Marxism, when in fact you seem to only be offended by Bolshevism and it's close relative Fascism?

you are clearly not a Communist, since a Communist would be horrified at the prospect of forcing another to adopt Marxist ideology, and while not a Bolshevik, you do subscribe to many of the plans and methods approved by Il Duce for his fascist variety.

the vagueism which shrouds your actual beliefs like a magic cloak is poor defense against those who you so frequently quote, and prop up as symbols of your own mysterious agenda.

since you refuse to delineate your position, i must therefore conclude that you are hiding it for a reason, and that reason is most likely, a strong vein of discredited Fascism or Bolshevism, or possibly even wacky Maoism running through your real belief system.

this would tie in closely with your perplexingly adamant refusal to even mention the Zapatista Marxist Insurgency currently operating in the country in which you reside.

the Zapatisas are notoriously Maoist, with close ties to Shining Path and several other marxist guerilla organizations south of the border, so i am given to conclude that you are in fact a Zapatista agent provocateur operating in secret to destabilize the comfortable tourist trade in baja.
 
then why do you spend so much effort quoting marxists

I don't. You just think that the people I quote are marxist. You are the only marxist. You are fucking obsessed with Marx. I quote Bert Russell and noam chomsky. Neither of them are marxist. You have been calling me a Marxist for months and you are flat out wrong.
 
then why do you spend so much effort quoting marxists, and defending the marxist systems which you feel were "good" (mainly due to their hypothetical nature) with only vague dismissals of those which were demonstrably evil?

i have been reading various commentaries and essays by Orwell, and i was surprised to discover that he was in fact a utopian communist, with a passion for "pure" marxist ideology, but like Bertie Russel, opposed Bolshevism for it's lack of ideological purity, and Fascism for it's nationalism and chauvinism.

as both Bertie Russel and now, (to my chagrin, since that means you were "right" on that issue) George Orwell were BOTH ardent believers in Marxism, how can you pretend that you do not adhere to Marxism, when in fact you seem to only be offended by Bolshevism and it's close relative Fascism?

you are clearly not a Communist, since a Communist would be horrified at the prospect of forcing another to adopt Marxist ideology, and while not a Bolshevik, you do subscribe to many of the plans and methods approved by Il Duce for his fascist variety.

the vagueism which shrouds your actual beliefs like a magic cloak is poor defense against those who you so frequently quote, and prop up as symbols of your own mysterious agenda.

since you refuse to delineate your position, i must therefore conclude that you are hiding it for a reason, and that reason is most likely, a strong vein of discredited Fascism or Bolshevism, or possibly even wacky Maoism running through your real belief system.

this would tie in closely with your perplexingly adamant refusal to even mention the Zapatista Marxist Insurgency currently operating in the country in which you reside.

the Zapatisas are notoriously Maoist, with close ties to Shining Path and several other marxist guerilla organizations south of the border, so i am given to conclude that you are in fact a Zapatista agent provocateur operating in secret to destabilize the comfortable tourist trade in baja.

Goddamn, I enjoy watching you work, son.
 
then why do you spend so much effort quoting marxists, and defending the marxist systems which you feel were "good" (mainly due to their hypothetical nature) with only vague dismissals of those which were demonstrably evil?

i have been reading various commentaries and essays by Orwell, and i was surprised to discover that he was in fact a utopian communist, with a passion for "pure" marxist ideology, but like Bertie Russel, opposed Bolshevism for it's lack of ideological purity, and Fascism for it's nationalism and chauvinism.

as both Bertie Russel and now, (to my chagrin, since that means you were "right" on that issue) George Orwell were BOTH ardent believers in Marxism, how can you pretend that you do not adhere to Marxism, when in fact you seem to only be offended by Bolshevism and it's close relative Fascism?

you are clearly not a Communist, since a Communist would be horrified at the prospect of forcing another to adopt Marxist ideology, and while not a Bolshevik, you do subscribe to many of the plans and methods approved by Il Duce for his fascist variety.

the vagueism which shrouds your actual beliefs like a magic cloak is poor defense against those who you so frequently quote, and prop up as symbols of your own mysterious agenda.

since you refuse to delineate your position, i must therefore conclude that you are hiding it for a reason, and that reason is most likely, a strong vein of discredited Fascism or Bolshevism, or possibly even wacky Maoism running through your real belief system.

this would tie in closely with your perplexingly adamant refusal to even mention the Zapatista Marxist Insurgency currently operating in the country in which you reside.

the Zapatisas are notoriously Maoist, with close ties to Shining Path and several other marxist guerilla organizations south of the border, so i am given to conclude that you are in fact a Zapatista agent provocateur operating in secret to destabilize the comfortable tourist trade in baja.

There is no part of this based on fact. Not even one of these statements are true.

You want to know what my philosophy is? I'll gladly tell.

Libertarian socialism.
 
hmm.. well since i am FOR:

a national healthcare system, provided is it paid for with transparent taxation, and not debt.
nationalizing the federal reserve banking cartel, as a nation's monetary system is too important to trust to faceless shadowy star chambers
ending our military excursions and foreign adventures in distant lands
NOT imposing democracy on fools who would rather have their marxist regime or a theocracy (or both, in the case of iran...)
restoring our national system of border controls and import inspections, so no more poor disadvantaged schlubs from non-utopian nations can come in to be exploited by the Bourgeois Capitalist Pigdogs
voluntary collectives, Co-Ops, communes, kibbutzes, and what ever other kind of voluntary socialist or collectivist organizations a person may wish to join.

yeah. i am in fact socialist as fuck, i just dont think anyone should be forced to submit to the dictatorship of fools who have demonstrated that their ideas JUST DONT WORK, unlike yourself.

You have been calling me a Marxist for months wrongly while you're a marxist.

Just can't make this shit up.
 
I don't. You just think that the people I quote are marxist. You are the only marxist. You are fucking obsessed with Marx. I quote Bert Russell and noam chomsky. Neither of them are marxist. You have been calling me a Marxist for months and you are flat out wrong.

bertie russel not a marxist??????

George Orwell (conveniently supplanted by Chomp Chomp despite his lack of presence in the argument cited) not a marxist????

ZOMG.

both delivered heartfelt love letters in praise of the Communist Manifesto, both celebrated Marx's "genius" and supported the Comintern's adoption of The Manifesto as the standard for World Communist Movements.

Orwell joined a devoutly Marxist militia (though not the Bolshevik led Communist International Brigade) in Spain

Chomp Chomp is the same sort of blushing demure secret Marxist that you seem to be, repeating their talking points, using their rhetoric, and espousing their assumption on history, society and political theory, without ever letting the label stick to his mucus slicked hide. even his helical shell is carefully polished and impervious to the adhesive on the "Honk IF You Love Marxism" and "Collectivists Do It In Groups" bumperstickers, which should adorn his conchoilin protective casing. (yes, im saying he is a snail)
 
Orwell and Russell were outspoken critics of Marxism. Orwell joined a libertarian militia in Spain. Chomsky isn't a marxist either but a libertarian socialist.

You're a clown.
 
bertie russel not a marxist??????

George Orwell (conveniently supplanted by Chomp Chomp despite his lack of presence in the argument cited) not a marxist????

ZOMG.

both delivered heartfelt love letters in praise of the Communist Manifesto, both celebrated Marx's "genius" and supported the Comintern's adoption of The Manifesto as the standard for World Communist Movements.

Orwell joined a devoutly Marxist militia (though not the Bolshevik led Communist International Brigade) in Spain

Chomp Chomp is the same sort of blushing demure secret Marxist that you seem to be, repeating their talking points, using their rhetoric, and espousing their assumption on history, society and political theory, without ever letting the label stick to his mucus slicked hide. even his helical shell is carefully polished and impervious to the adhesive on the "Honk IF You Love Marxism" and "Collectivists Do It In Groups" bumperstickers, which should adorn his conchoilin protective casing. (yes, im saying he is a snail)

Hahahahah FAIL. Orwell was notorious for criticizing Marxists. Chomsky bashes the authoritarian left on almost a daily basis and advocates for non hierarchical and libertarian societies. Keynes you're really starting to out yourself as a bullshitter. I'm sorry, but its just gotten absurd.
 
Last but not least.

Orwell was not at anytime in his life a Marxist. You're an idiot for saying that.



spain.jpg



Orwell, the tall figure in the middle fighting in Spain with the Marxist POUM
Partido Obrero de Unification Marxista.
Orwell's wife Eileen is seated to his left .Orwell was shot in the throat His wife helped him escape to France after the members of the POUM were arrested by the republicans .


In December 1936, Orwell went to Spain as a fighter for the Republican side in the Spanish Civil War that was provoked by Francisco Franco's Fascist uprising. He did not join the International Brigade as most leftist did , but the little known Marxist POUM .In conversation with Philip Mairet, editor of New English Weekly, Orwell said: 'This fascism ... somebody's got to stop it'.To Orwell, liberty and democracy went together, guaranteeing, among other things, the freedom of the artist; the present capitalist civilization was corrupt, but fascism would be morally calamitous.
http://georgeorwell.org/SpanishCivilWar.htm
ohh my... joined an explicitly Marxist (though Trotskyite rather than Stalinist) militia?

http://www.independentlabour.org.uk/main/2013/02/27/orwell-to-be-honoured-by-international-brigades/
Double Oh My! honored by a foundation dedicated to celebrating the Marxist International Brigades??

http://georgeorwellnovels.com/documents/spanish-revolution-february-1937/
Triple Oh My! he wrote for the Expressly Marxist POUM newspaper in spain?

all this leads to one inescapable conclusion, that he was most likely a Marxist of the Trotskyite flavour, rejecting authoritarianism and dictatorship, in favour of a "Kinder Gentler Marxism" which has yet to appear in any society EVER.

tee hee.
 
Hahahahah FAIL. Orwell was notorious for criticizing Marxists. Chomsky bashes the authoritarian left on almost a daily basis and advocates for non hierarchical and libertarian societies. Keynes you're really starting to out yourself as a bullshitter. I'm sorry, but its just gotten absurd.

Orwell bashed Bolsheviks and Stalinists, not Marxists in general.

he was intensely interested in proletarian movements, joined several marxist organizations, and attended Communist Party meetings in England (though he was not impressed with their leader's Jew-Bashing and scapegoating)

not a marxist? he never signed his name to the doted line but he was hardly a foe of the communist ideal.

Orwell's political ideology is nearly as veiled as AC's though MUCH more consistent. he seems to have eschewed labels in favour of principles, but he was decidedly Pro-Marxist in general, but anti-authoritarianism in specific.

unlike Bertie Russel who LOVED Marxism, while despising the Bolsheviks for their failure to remain pure in their revolutionary ideals.

but then thats why you boneheads are focusing on Orwell, he is a much harder cat to slap a label on (though this is a result of his curious political contradictions, rather than a deliberate obfuscation through slippery language)
 
Orwell and Russell were outspoken critics of Marxism. Orwell joined a libertarian militia in Spain. Chomsky isn't a marxist either but a libertarian socialist.

You're a clown.

Orwell joined the Party of Marxist Unification, not a libertarian militia.

russel only criticized BOLSHEVISM for failing to adhere to Marx's glorious vision. dont make me post Bertie's own words in praise of marx and condemnation of stalin...
 
Doc, I also heard Russel fucked T.S. Elliot's wife. But since Elliot was gay, I have a theory Elliot and Russel fucked to piss off his crazy wife and locked her up to use her money.
 
You have been calling me a Marxist for months wrongly while you're a marxist.

Just can't make this shit up.

nope, i am RIGHT, you quote Marxists, you use Marxist rhetoric, and adjhere to Marx's (faulty) assumptions

meanwhile i AM somewhat socialist, as long as the socialism is bound with stout chains of constitutionality, and not allowed free to rampage through the countryside, crushing captains of industry and hardworking peasants alike.
 
Doc, I also heard Russel fucked T.S. Elliot's wife. But since Elliot was gay, I have a theory Elliot and Russel fucked to piss off his crazy wife and locked her up to use her money.

dude, thats not even cool.

im talking historical facts, not slanderous insinuations.

dont let the boneheads get sidetracked on ad-hominem. they have finally started putting their statements into arguments which can be supported or refuted with facts.

dont derail the Crazy-Train.
 
Back
Top