Obamanomics... holy bat sh*t

CrackerJax

New Member
Well the CBO did it's perfunctionary review of Obama's budget and guess what? Read on and be very very scared....

Fiscal Policy: In his budget message, the president says "the time has come to usher in a new era of responsibility." But a new report shows the only thing his budget delivers is an unprecedented era of deficits and debt.
Late Friday, the Congressional Budget Office issued its review of the Obama budget. It's a standard exercise for the CBO, except this time the results were stunning.
According to the CBO, the Obama administration lowballed its deficit forecast by $482 billion over the next four years and $2.3 trillion over the next 10. In other words, the CBO says that 10-year deficits will be 33% higher than the president claims, should his plans get enacted.
This makes Obama's budget one of the worst accounting jobs ever put forward in modern times by a new administration.
When the CBO reviewed George W. Bush's first budget, for example, the difference between what Bush said his budget would cost and what the CBO said it would cost was minimal. Ditto its review of Clinton's first budget.
Even Reagan's first budget, which was widely panned for allegedly employing rosy scenarios to cook the numbers, differed from the CBO by just 1.2% in projected revenues and 5% in spending over the first four years.
So why the huge gap between Obama and the CBO?
Obama's team employed one of the oldest budget tricks in the books — exaggerating economic growth — to hide the true cost of his tax and spending plans. Budget forecasts are hugely sensitive to predictions about GDP growth, inflation, unemployment and interest rates. Even slight differences can have a huge impact on projected outlays and revenues.
And in his budget, Obama is positively Pollyannaish about the economy, predicting 3.2% real GDP growth next year, compared to the CBO's 2.9% and the Blue Chip consensus forecast of 1.9%. While the CBO and Blue Chip think unemployment will be 9% in 2010, Obama claims it will be only 7.9%. And so on.
Shorn of these tricks, the CBO finds that what remains is a fiscal plan that will leave the country mired in gargantuan deficits and debt.
Over the next decade, Obama's plan will produce annual deficits averaging 5.3% of the economy — compared with a post-war average of 2%. Even Obama's own budget director says that's unsustainable. Meanwhile, the national debt will hit 82.4% of GDP in 2019 under Obama's plan, according to the CBO, more than double the post-war average.
Worse, none of this includes Obama's pledge to expand health coverage. In his budget, he sets $606 billion over the next decade for health reform — through Medicare cuts and new taxes. But that's less than half the money most experts say is needed to fulfill Obama's universal health care pledge, leaving still more federal debt on the books.
Worse still, Obama would pile on all this debt just before the baby boomers start retiring in earnest, putting intense new pressures on federal deficits. Social Security's annual deficits will top $100 billion in 2020 and quickly go up from there, according to the Social Security Administration.
In response to all this, the administration says it's not giving an inch on its huge spending plans. And it goes on to dismiss the CBO as unreliable. "The CBO's projections," Obama budget director Peter Orszag wrote on the White House Web site, "are subject to a high degree of uncertainty."
It's a new era, all right. But clearly not a more responsible one.



Maybe he can go on David Letterman next?


out. :blsmoke:
 

strangerdude562

Well-Known Member
everything that's happening is Bush's fault, Obama is just here to clean up his mess and It's very difficult. Everyone seems to be blaming Obama when the true creator of the downfall of this country is that fucken puppet bush.
 

SomeGuy

Well-Known Member
everything that's happening is Bush's fault, Obama is just here to clean up his mess and It's very difficult. Everyone seems to be blaming Obama when the true creator of the downfall of this country is that fucken puppet bush.

Explain how him spending Trillions of tax payer dollars and putting this country into epic debt is bush's fault? I'm not saying there is no fault for bush (or any other politician) but come off it. We haven't had a "True" President in a long time. They are all puppets for the money power, right or left doesn't mean shit.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
SOK Strangerdude, you fessed up which is more than most will do.

But seriously, this is crazy stuff going on.

There are already signs that we are going to pull out of this recession, and since none of Obama's policies have had any effect so far, the recovery is not of his doing. But this straddling the US with MASSIVE debt that will be with us for a very very long time is irresponsible. Imagine in thirty years, citizens will be told that they are paying off a debt, for a recession which occurred around the turn of the century!!

This is what happens when you elect someone with ZERO experience coupled with the worst Congress in our history.

out. :blsmoke:
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
you elect someone with ZERO experience coupled with the worst Congress in our history.
out. :blsmoke:
for two yrs the conservative members on this web site have been preaching this message. not one person was able to explain how obama even qualified to be potus. we have also been yelling fire about his underlings, to only fall on deaf ears.
so, here we are.....
we promoted the worst congress in history by electing obama.
the cast of characters in obamas cabinet include, tax cheats and the old shady clinton war dogs.
watching the human gaff machine named hillary is embarrassing at best.
when she met with the russian foreign minister and couldn't say his name, then to hand him a prop of a reset button without knowing what is inscribed is seriously shocking. example of her qualifications is lacking.
omg she was almost president:shock:
lol dude, I could just rant on forever as I go down the list.

people can say the republicans are evil racist money hoarding scum, but one thing they can't say is the republicans are inept. and that my friend sums up the democrats in one word; inept.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Corrupt comes to mind.

I can remember Hillary stating that her top mission as Secretary was Global Warming. I nearly fell out of my chair. Huh? Imagine Kissinger saying that...:mrgreen:

That told me she wasn't expecting any other victories, so it would be best to lead with something which is already fooling everyone. "I beat Global Warming"! Our true threat... lawdy.


out. :blsmoke:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Well the CBO did it's perfunctionary review of Obama's budget and guess what? Read on and be very very scared....

Fiscal Policy: In his budget message, the president says "the time has come to usher in a new era of responsibility." But a new report shows the only thing his budget delivers is an unprecedented era of deficits and debt.
Late Friday, the Congressional Budget Office issued its review of the Obama budget. It's a standard exercise for the CBO, except this time the results were stunning.
According to the CBO, the Obama administration lowballed its deficit forecast by $482 billion over the next four years and $2.3 trillion over the next 10. In other words, the CBO says that 10-year deficits will be 33% higher than the president claims, should his plans get enacted.
This makes Obama's budget one of the worst accounting jobs ever put forward in modern times by a new administration.
When the CBO reviewed George W. Bush's first budget, for example, the difference between what Bush said his budget would cost and what the CBO said it would cost was minimal. Ditto its review of Clinton's first budget.
Even Reagan's first budget, which was widely panned for allegedly employing rosy scenarios to cook the numbers, differed from the CBO by just 1.2% in projected revenues and 5% in spending over the first four years.
So why the huge gap between Obama and the CBO?
Obama's team employed one of the oldest budget tricks in the books — exaggerating economic growth — to hide the true cost of his tax and spending plans. Budget forecasts are hugely sensitive to predictions about GDP growth, inflation, unemployment and interest rates. Even slight differences can have a huge impact on projected outlays and revenues.
And in his budget, Obama is positively Pollyannaish about the economy, predicting 3.2% real GDP growth next year, compared to the CBO's 2.9% and the Blue Chip consensus forecast of 1.9%. While the CBO and Blue Chip think unemployment will be 9% in 2010, Obama claims it will be only 7.9%. And so on.
Shorn of these tricks, the CBO finds that what remains is a fiscal plan that will leave the country mired in gargantuan deficits and debt.
Over the next decade, Obama's plan will produce annual deficits averaging 5.3% of the economy — compared with a post-war average of 2%. Even Obama's own budget director says that's unsustainable. Meanwhile, the national debt will hit 82.4% of GDP in 2019 under Obama's plan, according to the CBO, more than double the post-war average.
Worse, none of this includes Obama's pledge to expand health coverage. In his budget, he sets $606 billion over the next decade for health reform — through Medicare cuts and new taxes. But that's less than half the money most experts say is needed to fulfill Obama's universal health care pledge, leaving still more federal debt on the books.
Worse still, Obama would pile on all this debt just before the baby boomers start retiring in earnest, putting intense new pressures on federal deficits. Social Security's annual deficits will top $100 billion in 2020 and quickly go up from there, according to the Social Security Administration.
In response to all this, the administration says it's not giving an inch on its huge spending plans. And it goes on to dismiss the CBO as unreliable. "The CBO's projections," Obama budget director Peter Orszag wrote on the White House Web site, "are subject to a high degree of uncertainty."
It's a new era, all right. But clearly not a more responsible one.



Maybe he can go on David Letterman next?


out. :blsmoke:
New Era of IRRESPONSIBILITY

Responsibility clearly means that you try to live with in your means instead of trying to survive on credit. The failure of the Obama Administration to understand such a simple concept is clear indication that his administration is not capable of performing the roles they were either elected to, or nominated for.

Of course, such logic was self-evident when he elected a Tax Cheat to run the Treasury.
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Of course most of his 'stimulus" is nothing of the kind. It's a 40 year liberal wish list. 22 months till we can turn back towards a responsible govt. Well, more responsible than this anyways...:lol: Not funny.


out. :blsmoke:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Of course most of his 'stimulus" is nothing of the kind. It's a 40 year liberal wish list. 22 months till we can turn back towards a responsible govt. Well, more responsible than this anyways...:lol: Not funny.


out. :blsmoke:
Yeah, but will electing either party really help?

Bush and McCain were in the wrong party...
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Well, there is a bright side to Obama's stupidity.

We'll all get a chance to watch Keynesian Economics fail Miserably.

Hopefully (though I doubt it) the politicians will learn from this horribly idiotic experiment.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Has it occurred to anyone here that the economy really isn't what is concerning Obama and his far-left compatriots? As for me, I believe that Obama has an agenda of redistributing the wealth and "leveling the playing field." They are already talking about limiting the income of, not only the executives of AIG, but in all private corporations where the government deems the salaries and bonuses too high.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again ... Obama is a fascist and so are senators Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.

Look, bus loads of protesters ascended upon the homes of the AIG executives that received the bonus money. It turned out that the protesters were ACORN members acting on behalf of their messiah Obama. The only thing missing were brown shirts and bricks thrown through the windows of the executive's homes and we would have had America's version of Kristallnacht.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212268/posts

http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/kristallnacht/

Vi
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Both dodd and frank need to be in prison. period.

Hey, my wife just called me and said she heard on the radio that the central bank of China is making noise about getting off of the dollar. I smell a checkmate. What next?


out. :blsmoke:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Has it occurred to anyone here that the economy really isn't what is concerning Obama and his far-left compatriots? As for me, I believe that Obama has an agenda of redistributing the wealth and "leveling the playing field." They are already talking about limiting the income of, not only the executives of AIG, but in all private corporations where the government deems the salaries and bonuses too high.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again ... Obama is a fascist and so are senators Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.

Look, bus loads of protesters ascended upon the homes of the AIG executives that received the bonus money. It turned out that the protesters were ACORN members acting on behalf of their messiah Obama. The only thing missing were brown shirts and bricks thrown through the windows of the executive's homes and we would have had America's version of Kristallnacht.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2212268/posts

http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/kristallnacht/

Vi
The states just need to Secede
 
Top