Number of legal plants?????

does anyone no if its true the more medi cards you have in your house the more plants you can grow. For example if me and my girl friend have our cards can we do 12 mature and 12 immature, and then 16oz of cured bud. Cuz right now i think the law says 6 mature, 6 immature, 8 oz., for cali med. patients

I just made a post in another thread about this as I understand it...

January 4, 2010 California Supreme Court deemed with so many varying medical needs Limits on amounts growing and/or processed (dry) cannot be set therefore possession is unlimited within reason (stated in ruling 50 plants and 30 ounces processed.) I checked with my NORML contact here in Del Norte and another at Humboldt State University, Arcata confirmed but individual county law enforcement agencies are dealing with it differently. In an amazing turn of local events in Eureka, Humboldt County officials are not only discussing but planning Humboldt County Branding for the pending legalization! This can be confirmed with an archive search of the Times Standard Eureka

If you get the caregiver standing in your grow it can go to 100 plants. Not sure about processed or how that all works.

All I really know is I don't have to give the dispensaries $40 for 1/8 anymore!

Now I get renumeration and pay state and federal 1090 taxes for processed pot and clones!

God Bless California!!!

well i wanted to kind of keep it small, only about 10 or 12 plants in each room, so ill have less then 25, i was thinking i would just sell a qp or 2 to the club so i can keep paying for my nutes and electricity, and maybe make a lil extra cash on the side to save for a rainy day, and just keep the rest for myself and the 2 other medi patients i live with(the girlfriend doenst really live there but she practically does anyway),.... i have a full-time job so i dont really depend on my grows, a lil extra cash always helps though. would i have to get a certain license or pay taxes if i went that route?

yup... that is exactly what I am doing.

I just sampled my first harvest last night and this morning!
Whew...
I don't think the dispensary is going to see this one!

No special license. The legit "by the book" dispensaries and collectives will all have you fill out a 1099. Basically it is a renumeration tax withholding. That is Federal my friend so the US Gov is getting their two cents in a big way so call your State Rep!

Peace and long life

sick, ahahah must be some delicious treats if your keepin it from the dispens.! i just harvested my babies a few days ago, once i get my new room built up ITS ON!! thanks man

MrZuLu said:

I just made a post in another thread about this as I understand it...

January 4, 2010 California Supreme Court deemed with so many varying medical needs Limits on amounts growing and/or processed (dry) cannot be set therefore possession is unlimited within reason (stated in ruling 50 plants and 30 ounces processed.) I checked with my NORML contact here in Del Norte and another at Humboldt State University, Arcata confirmed but individual county law enforcement agencies are dealing with it differently. In an amazing turn of local events in Eureka, Humboldt County officials are not only discussing but planning Humboldt County Branding for the pending legalization! This can be confirmed with an archive search of the Times Standard Eureka

Click to expand...

i have not heard this. nor has it hit the news. btw i am 1.5 hrs from eureka. And i wouldn't chance it. if this is true then there has to be documentation, or even on the net. Also, while the sound of legalizing sounds great for us smokers. in reality it's bad, very bad. Just like booze and tobacco you will not be allowed to grow and harvest your own weed. The only weed will be from the big players with money. It will not be easy to legalize for many factors, and quite honestly i hope it does not pass.

Since channel 3 (NBC) is no longer available to me I quit following their web site. I will have to find that report. Ben Kroeplin reported it. Humboldt is wanting to brand pot like Napa branded their wine and Sonoma is trying to do the same. Are you telling me you can't grow grapes and sell the Wine which contains alcohol??? Don't forget prohibition and what the vintners went thru back then! Feds were chopping down hundred year old vines

This is California man!

MrZuLu said:

Since channel 3 (NBC) is no longer available to me I quit following their web site. I will have to find that report. Ben Kroeplin reported it. Humboldt is wanting to brand pot like Napa branded their wine and Sonoma is trying to do the same. Are you telling me you can't grow grapes and sell the Wine which contains alcohol??? Don't forget prohibition and what the vintners went thru back then! Feds were chopping down hundred year old vines

This is California man!

Click to expand...

grapes need refining. AND you can make your own wine and beer. But you can not make hard booze. you are not allowed to grow tobacco for your own use. why is that? It's no mystery that is exactly what will happen. It's all about money, that's why it's on the table. Not to allow people to grow their own and get high. What should be on the ballot is legalize, but the ONLY place you can "buy" weed is a medical dispensary. But you may grow your own. That won't happen either, because there is no money to made by the government. So i'm voting no unfortunately.

California NORML strongly advises Prop 215 patients to continue following the SB 420 guidelines – six mature or 12 immature plants and 8 ounces of processed marijuana except where local guidelines specify more. The Supreme Court’s recent Kelly decision has been widely misinterpreted to imply that the limits no longer apply, and that patients can therefore grow as much as they want. In fact, the Court’s decision lets the police arrest anyone who exceeds the guidelines, The only thing it disallows is for the guidelines to be used as a basis for conviction in criminal trials.
So, unless you don’t mind being arrested and dragged into court for a felony trial, where you will have to show that the amount of marijuana you had was consistent with your medical needs, the best rule of thumb is to follow the guidelines. The Kelly decision simply re-affirms the original intent of SB 420, which was to establish reasonable guidelines for arrest - not automatic limits for guilt.

basically....
if you can prove you and your girl need all the weed you are growing, it will be cool, despite a possible trip to jail.

A buddy of mine wonders why I don't like to come over to his house anymore...

He has 100-4 foot tall ladies at 6 weeks reeking in his garage and he is not only out of compliance but he has let his P215 lapse and has nothing backing him

Its this rogue growing thing that is not good...

I don't appreciate people with auto weapons rooming through our woods and destroying the Redwood Forest. They are dangerous and they pollute the streams and reek havoc on the forest floor. There are some areas near my house that you risk your life if you enjoy hiking in the forest!

MrZuLu said:

yup... that is exactly what I am doing.

I just sampled my first harvest last night and this morning!
Whew...
I don't think the dispensary is going to see this one!

No special license. The legit "by the book" dispensaries and collectives will all have you fill out a 1099. Basically it is a renumeration tax withholding. That is Federal my friend so the US Gov is getting their two cents in a big way so call your State Rep!

Peace and long life

Click to expand...

What is a 1099?