Nothing dumber than a flat earther

Status
Not open for further replies.

hillbill

Well-Known Member
Flat Earthers are pretty much like all Conspiracy fans, plainly wrong and in this case, proven wrong millions of times over hundreds of years.
Later
Back to growing threads
 

DaFreak

Well-Known Member
Flat Earthers are pretty much like all Conspiracy fans, plainly wrong and in this case, proven wrong millions of times over hundreds of years.
Later
Back to growing threads
I've lived long enough to see some of those conspiracies turn out to be true though, I've never managed to fall off the earth.
 

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
Iran-Contra: The CIA was providing tons of coke to Freeway Rick Ross through Danilo Blandon. Is was part of the Iran- Contra scandal. Coke money was used to support the Contras. See: Gary Webb San Jose Mercury News.

Gulf of Tonkin: It was the excuse used to kick off the Vietnam War. False flag attack like 9-11.

JFK assassination: Jackie crawled out on the left back portion of the limo to grab a chunk of her husbands brain. This could only happen if the shot came from the front and to the right. Anyone with a basic knowledge of ballistics and experience with guns should know this. Watch the Zapruder film. Clay Shaw was a former Colonel and CIA agent involved in international trade who was arrested and brought to trial by NOLA D.A. Jim Garrison. The media immediately attacked Garrison and made him out to be unhinged. Dozens of witnesses were outright murdered.

911: Controlled demolition using thermite. Don't even get me started on what a sloppy job this one was. World Trade building 7? *snickers*
Watergate: Nixon forced to resign. Moon Landings! LOL, Clinton death list, I could go on. So conspiracies and scandal are as American as apple pie.
 
Last edited:

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
If you don't care, why did you bring it up in the first place? To make such claims, wouldn't it have been prudent to read through the entire thread, so that you could have gained significant and extremely clear context and storyline?
Possibly “to get a reaction”. He got one, so troll point scored.
 

f series

Well-Known Member
Possibly “to get a reaction”. He got one, so troll point scored.
Not the case, I only read like 1-2 pages, but to me, there was no point to their conversation.

Got tired of if, talked some shit. Then you ask me my thoughts, basically trying to see who's "side" I'm on. As I said earlier though, I really don't care about their topic.

Not trying to troll, sorry if it came off that way...

I don't consider my post troll worthy personally, but if you do, sorry
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Not the case, I only read like 1-2 pages, but to me, there was no point to their conversation.

Got tired of if, talked some shit. Then you ask me my thoughts, basically trying to see who's "side" I'm on. As I said earlier though, I really don't care about their topic.

Not trying to troll, sorry if it came off that way...

I don't consider my post troll worthy personally, but if you do, sorry
No worries. However the two posters you mentioned are on opposite sides of a basic cognitive divide.
 

f series

Well-Known Member
No worries. However the two posters you mentioned are on opposite sides of a basic cognitive divide.
Yeah I knew that, (hostility) it's just the particular post I saw had 1 person (A) trying to get the other (B) to prove his point, then it appeared person (A) took on person (B)'s point and defended it against person (B)

Which I thought was hilarious.

This is why I was saying it was pointless, this is how the conversation appeared to me via the few text I read, maybe I got confused amongst all this stuff here. But yeah, I understood they were against each other
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Yeah I knew that, (hostility) it's just the particular post I saw had 1 person (A) trying to get the other (B) to prove his point, then it appeared person (A) took on person (B)'s point and defended it against person (B)

Which I thought was hilarious.

This is why I was saying it was pointless, this is how the conversation appeared to me via the few text I read, maybe I got confused amongst all this stuff here. But yeah, I understood they were against each other
I missed that. Are you willing to give me a more detailed account of that?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top