abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Make it Soylent Green?
Next up: mandated burial insurance...
- Thread starter JustAnotherHead
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i agree. there's this one guy who calls watching poor people die "righteous".
oh, wait. that's you.
go rawn pawl!
InCognition
Active Member
The difference between me in you is, I'm able to separate morality with logic.i agree. there's this one guy who calls watching poor people die "righteous".
oh, wait. that's you.
go rawn pawl!
Morality and logic do not coincide with each other... you can examine many religions around the world, to obtain an educated understanding of that.
It's the weak minded who can not disassociate morality and logic.
chrishydro
Well-Known Member
There will be no reason for burial, the next mandate will be that when you die they take your body and use all the parts for people that can not afford transplants then they burn you and send the ashes back to your family, provided of course, that your health care was up to date when you died, if not, than they just going to use the ashes to train other TSA agents.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
That implies that the strong of mind champion morality that is unsupported by logic. Wait whut!? cn
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's the sociopath who calls watching poor people die "righteous".
you'll end up on the evening news one day for eating a poor man's face.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
obama derangement syndrome is in full swing today
chrishydro
Well-Known Member
By far the most political showdown since I have been voting and I am 51. Crazy stuff, what could pos be next.
canndo
Well-Known Member
Hyperbole, and sour grapes.
you pay anyway, why not make payments official. In a conservative world, people would grow sick on the street corner, drop dead in the gutters and rot where they lay.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Morality is as susceptible to fallacy as logic. A moral fallacy is a choice with poor reasoning, as a logical fallacy is an argument with poor reasoning. There are many examples of both. If you are simply suggesting that the word 'Morality' implies conformity to a doctrine, than I say to you, a nonconformist still has doctrine, it is simply individual. Logic and morality are inseparable, the brain is bicameral.
InCognition
Active Member
That implies that you don't understand English Grammar. Wait what?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Fertilizing the soil is not selfish.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
The first quote contains a built-in contradiction.
First you claim to be able to separate morality with logic. What does that even mean?
Then something about religion, insinuating that it might be a valid source of moral thought.
Finally something about people "who cannot dissociate morality and logic".
Whether the disconnect is grammatical or syntactic is of lesser interest. I am simply trying to figure out what you're even saying. A good debate partner is, before all else, comprehensible. cn
InCognition
Active Member
I'm simply trying to figure out what you're saying.
I'm kidding... I actually did just thoroughly read over and dissect what you just said... I'll just leave it at we both don't know what each other is saying because I'm not going to take the time to re-explain, explaining myself.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;-LmDs1YTfD8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LmDs1YTfD8[/video]
^^^^^
you all had to of seen this