Neoliberalism has wrecked the planet

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Just like Hillary had it all wrapped up. Wait, she lost. Fact.
Keep drinking the koolaid why quoting biased polls and reporting.
You live in a fairytale liberal haze.
the polls had hillary winning by 2-3 and she did. they were more accurate than in 2012 when obama overperformed his poll numbers by 4-5%
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Not sure what 'trifled' is. But he not one to be fucked with. Unlike Obama he has a pair of balls.
Just face it, you can't handle reality. Your best bet is to stay in your safe place with your coloring book.
obama took out bin laden.

also, south korea's president did not say trump should get a nobel. he said you could give a nobel to trump for all he cares, all he wants is peace.

watch less fox news, idiot
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
He will walk away from the table if they don't. Trump has already stated that.
They wont give up their nukes. Book it.

Will you laugh with us when Trump accepts a nuclear-armed North Korea? I'm not 100% certain he will but I think that is likely.

There goes the Nobel.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
the polls had hillary winning by 2-3 and she did. they were more accurate than in 2012 when obama overperformed his poll numbers by 4-5%
He doesn't even know what the word trifle means. No way he can understand polling numbers. To him, the polls predicted a landslide when the margin of error was within the poll predictions. "BUTTT the polls said she'd win":dunce:
 

Stink Bug

Well-Known Member
Trifle yes. Trifled no. Why should I defend our President just because you do not like or agree with him. That is a you problem.
I will say CNNs last popularity rating was based on a phone survey of 1085 people. Seems like a fair representation of the american public too me. Chuckle
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Trifle yes. Trifled no. Why should I defend our President just because you do not like or agree with him. That is a you problem.
I will say CNNs last popularity rating was based on a phone survey of 1085 people. Seems like a fair representation of the american public too me. Chuckle
what do you think of trump lying to the american people from aboard air force one about his hush money payment to the prostitute he was fucking as his third wife sat at home with their newborn infant?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Trifle yes. Trifled no. Why should I defend our President just because you do not like or agree with him. That is a you problem.
I will say CNNs last popularity rating was based on a phone survey of 1085 people. Seems like a fair representation of the american public too me. Chuckle
"but the polls said she'd win" I don't know if you are just stupid or willfully ignorant.

Now then, about this Noble prize you keep talking about.


There is his noble and that's his prize. Aww, he even closed his eyes as a sign of respect when bowing to the Saudi King.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"but the polls said she'd win" I don't know if you are just stupid or willfully ignorant.

Now then, about this Noble prize you keep talking about.


There is his noble and that's his prize.
why is trump bowing to our enemies?
 

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
World war 1 Now that was one really bad time. Don't get me wrong, I'm not belittling anything anybody experiences from violence and war in today's world. Just saying that this apocalyptic view that the world is worse today than it was 'back then" has poor ability to understand.

In a way you and many others around here are the same. You and others make up words from existing ones. Some have their own meaning for the word Progressive. You have your own definition of Anarchy. That's fine. My main language is English and when I'm in general conversation using English, I don't use jargon. I've stuck around long enough to know that when @ttystikk or @Padawanbater2 use the word progressive, they mean something more like liberal idealist They aren't making real progress any more than Bernie Sanders has in his 12 years in the Senate.

So, you have your own idea of what Anarchy is. It really does figure. Your own view on Anarchy. Makes sense. Just one other thing. You aren't interesting enough for me to try to figure out what that means to you..
My own definition of anarchy? Correction, you seen to many jmovies with Ethan Hawke....

Its not my vision of anarchy, its actually the original anarco syndicalist conception which can be divided into individualist or collective, either way. Films with ethan hawke describing anarchism as total chaos and legal crime.... Thats your definition NOT mine, its your little coporate conglomerate giving you their view of whats a threat to national security. Cause national security aint about protecting people, its about protecting the funds and and those who manipulate the money, from the banks to the multinationals. And this is the sole reason the system places anarchists in a category worst then jihadists or communists And if you are naive to this thats on YOU
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
My own definition of anarchy? Correction, you seen to many jmovies with Ethan Hawke....

Its not my vision of anarchy, its actually the original anarco syndicalist conception which can be divided into individualist or collective, either way. Films with ethan hawke describing anarchism as total chaos and legal crime.... Thats your definition NOT mine, its your little coporate conglomerate giving you their view of whats a threat to national security. Cause national security aint about protecting people, its about protecting the funds and and those who manipulate the money, from the banks to the multinationals. And this is the sole reason the system places anarchists in a category worst then jihadists or communists And if you are naive to this thats on YOU
You already talked about Japan as some hot bed of anarchism which is laughably false. Now you say something else. How anarchistic of you to keep changing what you want the word anarchist to mean.

I said before, you are boring and I have no interest in trying to figure out what you mean by Anarchism when your own descriptions jump all over the place.

In the few places of the world in recent history where so-called anarchism was tried, those places went under to authoritarian regimes in very short order.

I'll take democracy thank you very much. It's not perfect but better than authoritarianism.
 
Last edited:

Z3r0Z3r0

Well-Known Member
You already talked about Japan as some hot bed of anarchism which is laughably false. Now you say something else. How anarchistic of you to keep changing what you want the word anarchist to mean.

I said before, you are boring and I have no interest in trying to figure out what you mean by Anarchism when your own descriptions jump all over the place.

In the few places of the world in recent history where so-called anarchism was tried, those places went under to authoritarian regimes in very short order.

I'll take democracy thank you very much. It's not perfect but better than authoritarianism.
Where did I say anything contradicting? Or are you too stoned to comprehend what Im saying? I said Osaka is the bastion of jap anarchism and in fact where the main anarchist union is, where did I say all of Japan mr stereotyping american you are?

Dont bother trying to figure out my anarchism cause you dont know what anarchism is period except what a friggen sensationalist movie for burgouise idiots to fear watch

Democracy? Correction anarchism is true democracy. Voting maters in that utopia, not in so called capitalism which is nothing but fascism in disgues under the label "Democracy"

The only thing your correct about is totalitarians ruining it. Which btw the democracys allowed, your a brit right? Worst then an american. Irish had it right with you ppl...
 
Top