More "guns are bad antics"

ViRedd

New Member
Yeah that is what I am saying, I don't think anyone posting on this board will argue that we have went too far. We have to pad the shit out of our kids now until they try to rollerblade looking like the kid in the snowsuit in A Christmas Story.

I don't think you are going to get anyone to be shocked about this is all.
Well assuming that you meant "haven't gone too far:"

Are you kidding? There is a whole cadre of idiots posting on this board who want to turn over our entire health care industry into the hands of the likes of Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Chris Dodd, thereby turning over our health privacy as well.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
See that is where you go too far. Nobody is saying to turn it over to them. And nobody is talking about the entire industry except your side.

This is about someone calling the fuzz about a picture, and you think that people that want to see millions of people that cannot get health insurance (and several more that won't) is anything near the same thing?

That is just rediculous. It is akin to saying that the parental right stickers on rap cd's is the same as government regulations on dumping toxic waste in rivers.
 

Puffster

Well-Known Member
alot of you guys are not understanding the concept of where this happened.nyc has ETREMELY tuff gun laws.coming on the heels of pro footballs plaxico buress idiotic "highly" publized fiasco.im not surprized.i personally am against private citizens owning hand guns but certainly respect majority opinion.however i believe to defend an adult putting handgun in infants hands is not good and i believe not defensible in the court of common sense.
 

NewGrowth

Well-Known Member
if you knew anything about guns you know you should always consider every gun loaded.

how do you know they weren't loaded?

you give toddlers weed?
I get your point but I don't think that the government should be taking someone's children over something protected under the constitution. I don't condone the parents acts but it seems like another bullshit reason for the government to infringe upon our basic rights.
 

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
[SIZE=+1][/SIZE]Columbine? An anomaly. Ever read history? Here's some. The horrors of liberty pale compared to the horrors of tyranny. Let freedom reign. Buy a gun, whatever one you like, and protect yourself with deadly force, if necessary. God bless America, and the natural rights it protects.

[SIZE=+1]
Soviet Union
, Stalin's regime (1924-53): 20 000 000[/SIZE] [make link]
  • There are basically two schools of thought when it comes to the number who died at Stalin's hands. There's the "Why doesn't anyone realize that communism is the absolutely worst thing ever to hit the human race, without exception, even worse than both world wars, the slave trade and bubonic plague all put together?" school, and there's the "Come on, stop exaggerating. The truth is horrifying enough without you pulling numbers out of thin air" school. The two schools are generally associated with the right and left wings of the political spectrum, and they often accuse each other of being blinded by prejudice, stubbornly refusing to admit the truth, and maybe even having a hidden agenda. Also, both sides claim that recent access to former Soviet archives has proven that their side is right.
 

NewGrowth

Well-Known Member
That's a red herring, fdd.

One of the costs of liberty is risk. :blsmoke:
So now they have metal detectors and security guards, oh yeah and police dogs go through schools looking for contraband. And nobody says a god damn thing because of Columbine. Same mentality followed 911 . . . . short sighted reactionary thinking.
 

Green Cross

Well-Known Member
"Teaching Your Kids About Guns

May 24, 2009 | Print This Post
As Americans, our right to bear arms is — or at least should be — protected under the Constitution. Guns are an integral part of American life, and as such, I want my kids to be knowledgeable about guns. Not that I'm going to take them out on the gun range and teach them to shoot, but I want them to know the terminology related to guns, how firearms work, as well as gun safety. By studying guns, my children develop a greater respect for how dangerous can can be if not handled appropriately; and firearm study may also serve to remove the “curiosity” instinct which causes some kids to play with guns simply because they’ve never seen one in “real life” before.
So last year my kids and I spent a couple of weeks learning about firearms. (I say my kids and I because prior to this study I knew next to nothing about guns; I haven't even fired a gun in my life!). At the end of our study a friend of ours invited us over so we could have a hands-on lesson with real guns (all of them unloaded, of course). The kids learned a lot about gun-safety while they got to see, in "real life," the workings of a wide variety of firearms.


In case you'd like to embark on a study of firearms with your own children, here are some of the resources we used, which you can use as well.
  • Read an encyclopedia entry about guns. We read Grolier’s The New Book of Knowledge (copyright 1985) which has a great article about firearms under “Guns and Ammunition.” It covered the subject in a very thorough and understandable manner.
  • Visit How Stuff Works to read their excellent articles about guns:
    • “How Flintlock Guns Work” is not just about the flintlock; it covers the matchlock and percussion cap as well. This is probably the first of the How Stuff Works article you’d need to read, as it covers a lot of basic information."
I don't see anything inherently wrong with kids handling guns, and there is no evidence that they were doing so irresponsibly.
 

ChChoda

Well-Known Member
So now they have metal detectors and security guards, oh yeah and police dogs go through schools looking for contraband. And nobody says a god damn thing because of Columbine. Same mentality followed 911 . . . . short sighted reactionary thinking.
And if schools weren't liberal bastions and they could permanently expel troubled students deemed dangerous we wouldn't of had many of these "problems" to begin with. But that would be unfair to the young deranged murderer, to pass judgment prematurely, before the killing sprees occurred. Virginia tech anyone?
 

ViRedd

New Member
^^^ Exactly. Liberal bastions, indeed!

As I said in a post in another thread, all my kids attended private Catholic schools for their entire educations K-12. Each of these schools had a zero tolerance policy toward problem students. Screw up and you'll be off to the local government indoctrination center, known as the public school. :lol:
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
^^^ Exactly. Liberal bastions, indeed!

As I said in a post in another thread, all my kids attended private Catholic schools for their entire educations K-12. Each of these schools had a zero tolerance policy toward problem students. Screw up and you'll be off to the local government indoctrination center, known as the public school. :lol:
What??? Nothing is more indoctrinated than the catholic church.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I had my first .22 rifle at age 8, my first shotgun at age 10. I went hunting with my dad, he taught me firearm safety, respect for others property and the common sense to kill nothing unless you planned on eating it or had to defend yourself.

I taught my 9 year old girls these same values and took them to the rifle range and let them tear it up with my AR. They then spent the next 2 hours cleaning my rifle. They learned respect.

The only "crime" those folks committed was taking the picture. They should just say they photoshopped all of it for their defense.
 
Top