Make the Moon great again.

MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
CannaBruh said:
Please don't pervert the argument relating to cannabis/moon as being an effort to discredit science which was not the intent.

Doctors and educated folk were appealed to; The head of the FDA has a PHD yet still cannabis is classified as having no science based medicinal benefit. Conspiracy?
Click to expand...

The FDA doesn’t decide the classification for whether drugs are illegal or not. The DEA does.

And they have known about cbd at least for years. The government holds patents on it and how to extract it.
 
CannaBruh

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
The FDA doesn’t decide the classification for whether drugs are illegal or not. The DEA does.

And they have known about cbd at least for years. The government holds patents on it and how to extract it.
Click to expand...
What is CBD's classification?

I'd say you're half right on the first part ;) but you said "doesn't"
 
CannaBruh

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
What are you talking about? Cbd is known not to be psychoactive and thc is known to be psychoactive there is no conspiracy over that.

Psychoactive substances tend to be regulated. Right or wrong and usually for money reasons not our safety.
Click to expand...
I'll answer the question and clarify..

CBD is schedule 1 as are all extracts as far as I'm aware, and the FDA is involved in determining what drugs are classified and their classification.

What do you think about these classifications? Was it stupid people with no degrees or PHDs and scientists that led to the current classifications?

Anyways, this tangent is getting very far from my point of "sometimes doctors are not always right" stemming from the call to authority with the suggesting that only stupid people support conspiracies where we have a prime example of PHDs participating in one.
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
CannaBruh said:
I'll answer the question and clarify..

CBD is schedule 1 as are all extracts as far as I'm aware, and the FDA is involved in determining what drugs are classified and their classification.

What do you think about these classifications? Was it stupid people with no degrees or PHDs and scientists that led to the current classifications?

Anyways, this tangent is getting very far from my point of "sometimes doctors are not always right" stemming from the call to authority with the suggesting that only stupid people support conspiracies where we have a prime example of PHDs participating in one.
Click to expand...

I didn’t make the statement about how smart people who believe conspiracies are.

And you are completely off with your entire premise is why I keep challenging you.

Cbd oil is available online and in health stores. It is not classified as schedule 1. Thc is.

And here is who and how drugs are scheduled.

https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml


So no. I do not agree with either premise you have stated. Try using facts if you want to debate.
 
CannaBruh

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
I didn’t make the statement about how smart people who believe conspiracies are.

And you are completely off with your entire premise is why I keep challenging you.

Cbd oil is available online and in health stores. It is not classified as schedule 1. Thc is.

And here is who and how drugs are scheduled.

https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml


So no. I do not agree with either premise you have stated. Try using facts if you want to debate.
Click to expand...
There are well documented cases currently going on regarding this.

Try this one
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2018/04/30/17-70162.pdf

If you didn't make the statement, why are you replying, let the parties that made the statement stand behind their position you need not go out of your way to state you didn't state something.
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
CannaBruh said:
There are well documented cases currently going on regarding this.

Try this one
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2018/04/30/17-70162.pdf

If you didn't make the statement, why are you replying, let the parties that made the statement stand behind their position you need not go out of your way to state you didn't state something.
Click to expand...

I’m replying because I am taking part in a discussion in an open forum.

The appeal you linked is about rescheduling not what you are implying. And the dea relies on drug busts to stay in business. That is all it is about.
 
CannaBruh

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
I’m replying because I am taking part in a discussion in an open forum.

The appeal you linked is about rescheduling not what you are implying. And the dea relies on drug busts to stay in business. That is all it is about.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure you are even sure of what it is I'm implying.... can you state it clearly?

You see no implication over the DEA's position as it relates to extracts containing one or more cannabinoids?
 
MichiganMedGrower

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
CannaBruh said:
I'm not sure you are even sure of what it is I'm implying.... can you state it clearly?

You see no implication over the DEA's position as it relates to extracts containing one or more cannabinoids?
Click to expand...

Sure. You said (not implied) that the fda has doctors that have said pot is bad or unhealthy and that is why it is illegal.

I am saying the dea decides that and that doctors do not make their decision. Arrest records do.

It has already been established that thc is psychoactive and that is all they need to schedule it as if it is a narcotic.

As far as educated or not people choose to believe what they want like the moon landing. It is easy to pretend to see patterns or proofs of whatever we want. It is known as confirmation bias and phd’s do it as often as other people do.

That is why a neutral tester is in charge of a true scientific experiment. If the scientist trying to prove something is the judge confirmation bias can influence the results.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
CannaBruh said:
I'll answer the question and clarify..

CBD is schedule 1 as are all extracts as far as I'm aware, and the FDA is involved in determining what drugs are classified and their classification.

What do you think about these classifications? Was it stupid people with no degrees or PHDs and scientists that led to the current classifications?

Anyways, this tangent is getting very far from my point of "sometimes doctors are not always right" stemming from the call to authority with the suggesting that only stupid people support conspiracies where we have a prime example of PHDs participating in one.
Click to expand...
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_4?url=search-alias=aps&field-keywords=cbd+oil&sprefix=cbd+,aps,184&crid=2XAGBNO9BAKLE

cbd on amazon.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top