Make the Moon great again.

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
Lol even louder. You even had to alert me again.

And now you have included “we” as I you are already correct and someone believes you.
...scope of interest in conversation waning

"we" could be perceived as "those within the thread?" no? are you failing to make that connection? (is that an insult or some fun internet banter.. I'll let you define)

Even louder? I asked you to point out what you perceive of mine having been self-doubt? You fail to do so? lol? ok...

Lol. I only asked you what you believed about it. You are assuming the rest.

“both suspect” is not an answer. How do you feel they are suspect.

You are pointing to fake news way back in the 70’s and 80’s. No one took the conspiracy seriously back then either.
I believe they are suspect footage, suffice to say that should satisfy any further inquiry.

What fake news, are you making up citiations that I've never offered?

I point to rocket footage and golf club moon landing footage and your conclusion is I'm pointing to fake news?
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
@MichiganMedGrower

we; "used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people considered together." ...note that in no way does this make assumption that 'speaker' assumes one or more are in some way sharing some belief, not to be construed as anything other than "those present in context" but take it as you like it.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
...scope of interest in conversation waning

"we" could be perceived as "those within the thread?" no? are you failing to make that connection? (is that an insult or some fun internet banter.. I'll let you define)

Even louder? I asked you to point out what you perceive of mine having been self-doubt? You fail to do so? lol? ok...


I believe they are suspect footage, suffice to say that should satisfy any further inquiry.

What fake news, are you making up citiations that I've never offered?

I point to rocket footage and golf club moon landing footage and your conclusion is I'm pointing to fake news?


If you say so. I still only asked you for your reasons why you think the footage is fake.

The fake news was a documentary made in the seventies supposedly proving the moon landing a fake.

Sorry you got upset so easily just being asked to back up your assertions. I don’t think you sound too sure of yourself from your comments.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
@MichiganMedGrower

we; "used by a speaker to refer to himself or herself and one or more other people considered together." ...note that in no way does this make assumption that 'speaker' assumes one or more are in some way sharing some belief, not to be construed as anything other than "those present in context" but take it as you like it.

You are wound really tight dude. You started by being rude to me. I only asked a question. Then pointed out how you are not answering it.
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
If you say so. I still only asked you for your reasons why you think the footage is fake.

The fake news was a documentary made in the seventies supposedly proving the moon landing a fake.

Sorry you got upset so easily just being asked to back up your assertions. I don’t think you sound too sure of yourself from your comments.
I did say so, watch the footage, if you think you're watching live broadcast footage of people on the moon then good, we disagree.

Sorry you get so upset over perceived internet insults (friendly banter much?)

He is crying like you always do. Like any silly conspiracy theorist does when challenged.
.... carry on dude, nobody crying until you whine about being insulted.. which was like not even an insult but a call for you to look into what specifically was being discussed, apologies if that missed.

You are wound really tight dude. You started by being rude to me. I only asked a question. Then pointed out how you are not answering it.
Rude? again your perceptions are skewed, this is the internet, on a weed forum, talking moon landing shit... where do you think you are again? :bigjoint:

Godspeed recovery for your injuries
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
I did say so, watch the footage, if you think you're watching live broadcast footage of people on the moon then good, we disagree.

Sorry you get so upset over perceived internet insults (friendly banter much?)


.... carry on dude, nobody crying until you whine about being insulted.. which was like not even an insult but a call for you to look into what specifically was being discussed, apologies if that missed.


Rude? again your perceptions are skewed, this is the internet, on a weed forum, talking moon landing shit... where do you think you are again? :bigjoint:

Godspeed recovery for your injuries

Ok. You win. You aren’t the upset one posting this way.
 

Cx2H

Well-Known Member
We flew to the moon?

How they get through the Van Allen radiation belt with tin foil?

Why have we not been back since the 70's?

Why do they keep scrapping lunar manned missions?

Why can't we get some HD images of lunar garbage we left like rovers and sheet. Not reflecting mirrors bouncing laser's back as proof.
I think it's a bunch of horsesheet really. We were nut flexing for the cold war saying we were superior with technology and missiles.

I just hope this thread doesn't turn into a quasi FE fuktard fest like aliens did..
#JustSaying
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
Thank you for the kind wishes. But I think you may have missed the sarcasm. ;-)
It landed just fine, you're missing the redirection. You have stated in ways (without much specifics) how you think i'm upset self-doubting or insulting or (insert excerpt from above) so I'm trying to show you that isn't the case. :hug:

We can disagree and fling poop and still be friends :blsmoke:
 

Puff_Dragon

Well-Known Member
James Van Allen would be laughing at this thread (he had a lot to say about people who don't think the astronauts could pass the belts that bear his name).
imo - the moon landing conspiracy (like any number of other conspiracies that had a resurgence on the internet) are simply New Age religions. To doubt the moon landings is to doubt rationality, secular Science (for one thing). To me, viewing secular Science as some negative 'establishment' is frankly no different then believing in an old world religion. And as we talk of ignorance ..it's odd that the vast majority of moon conspiracy believers have no Masters degrees, doctorates (any high level of education in a respected field). That all seems to explain (to me) why a very specific group of people fall for this kind of hokum. You have to 'want' to believe (and then use confirmation bias to reinforce that belief) until it becomes the believers reality.

Still, saying all that. I'd like to think i could share a jay with anyone on this forum. Irrespective of opinions ...well, maybe not flat earthers ;-)
 

Cx2H

Well-Known Member
James Van Allen would be laughing at this thread (he had a lot to say about people who don't think the astronauts could pass the belts that bear his name).
imo - the moon landing conspiracy (like any number of other conspiracies that had a resurgence on the internet) are simply New Age religions. To doubt the moon landings is to doubt rationality, secular Science (for one thing). To me, viewing secular Science as some negative 'establishment' is frankly no different then believing in an old world religion. And as we talk of ignorance ..it's odd that the vast majority of moon conspiracy believers have no Masters degrees, doctorates (any high level of education in a respected field). That all seems to explain (to me) why a very specific group of people fall for this kind of hokum. You have to 'want' to believe (and then use confirmation bias to reinforce that belief) until it becomes the believers reality.

Still, saying all that. I'd like to think i could share a jay with anyone on this forum. Irrespective of opinions ...well, maybe not flat earthers ;-)
I'll chop it up with you and talk anytime. ;-)

I just wanna know why we haven't back in that case. If we could do it with 70's technology why not now?
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
James Van Allen would be laughing at this thread (he had a lot to say about people who don't think the astronauts could pass the belts that bear his name).
imo - the moon landing conspiracy (like any number of other conspiracies that had a resurgence on the internet) are simply New Age religions. To doubt the moon landings is to doubt rationality, secular Science (for one thing). To me, viewing secular Science as some negative 'establishment' is frankly no different then believing in an old world religion. And as we talk of ignorance ..it's odd that the vast majority of moon conspiracy believers have no Masters degrees, doctorates (any high level of education in a respected field). That all seems to explain (to me) why a very specific group of people fall for this kind of hokum. You have to 'want' to believe (and then use confirmation bias to reinforce that belief) until it becomes the believers reality.

Still, saying all that. I'd like to think i could share a jay with anyone on this forum. Irrespective of opinions ...well, maybe not flat earthers ;-)
Fair enough, I'd like to add to your point if I can append onto your Masters/Doctorates statement.. it's equally odd that few (though increasing) from these same sciences including medicine have failed to rebuttal secular science as was given in times of reefer madness.
 

MichiganMedGrower

Well-Known Member
James Van Allen would be laughing at this thread (he had a lot to say about people who don't think the astronauts could pass the belts that bear his name).
imo - the moon landing conspiracy (like any number of other conspiracies that had a resurgence on the internet) are simply New Age religions. To doubt the moon landings is to doubt rationality, secular Science (for one thing). To me, viewing secular Science as some negative 'establishment' is frankly no different then believing in an old world religion. And as we talk of ignorance ..it's odd that the vast majority of moon conspiracy believers have no Masters degrees, doctorates (any high level of education in a respected field). That all seems to explain (to me) why a very specific group of people fall for this kind of hokum. You have to 'want' to believe (and then use confirmation bias to reinforce that belief) until it becomes the believers reality.

Still, saying all that. I'd like to think i could share a jay with anyone on this forum. Irrespective of opinions ...well, maybe not flat earthers ;-)

Nicely said. I feel the same way. I believe everyone should believe what they want. But when they resort to insults when their logic runs out it becomes difficult to relate to them or the discussion.

If they smoke with me in person. Will they still need to play the part of the evangelist?
 
Top