Let the people decide

So for how many years now have law enforcement and government been tossing around the hot marijuana potatoe? 15? Ever since med weed started in 2001?

They have been running around in circles ever since. Nobody knows what to do or how to do it. Nobody wants to stick their political necks out. It is a farce, by any definition of the word.

So why not put all of this to a referendum just like Colorado did 4 years ago? Let the people decide what should be done and how.

Its a simple process and i will crush the cost argument against it right now by saying that it would be a lot cheaper than paying a comtittee millions of dollars over however many years to get nothing done.

I think it is time that this question be put to JT, Blair and that Mclellan hose bag. And then watch them squirm....

they have...except the ones in power think they should make the riches...

If anyone doesn't BOYCOTT lp's...they are a fool.

gb123 said:

they have...except the ones in power think they should make the riches...

Click to expand...

Again... WTF are you talking about?

I am talking about pressuring the gov into a referendum, nothing more. To my knowledge there has not been a concerted effort on this of any kind. Correct me if I am wrong.

Gquebed said:

Again... WTF are you talking about?

I am talking about pressuring the gov into a referendum, nothing more. To my knowledge there has not been a concerted effort on this of any kind. Correct me if I am wrong.

Click to expand...

Referendums in Canada, as specified by the Referendum Act of 1992 are only on constitutional issues (not Charter challenges, but a direct line or concept in the constitution). Canada has had three referendums total, none of which has been binding. Interestingly enough, a referendum on introducing alcohol prohibition came out with a 'yes' result, but the government of the day chose to leave it up to the provinces.

Ballot measures in the US are different, in that they are legally 'binding'. BC is the only province to have something like this, which is why they were able to vote to repeal the HST. So a non-binding referendum is not an effective use of resources here, and isn't going to solve anything. It also isn't cheap.

You have to open up polling / ballot stations, do a bunch of signage / posting to be in compliance with the Referendum act, etc. Not to mention it's still up to the government.

JungleStrikeGuy said:

Referendums in Canada, as specified by the Referendum Act of 1992 are only on constitutional issues (not Charter challenges, but a direct line or concept in the constitution). Canada has had three referendums total, none of which has been binding. Interestingly enough, a referendum on introducing alcohol prohibition came out with a 'yes' result, but the government of the day chose to leave it up to the provinces.

Ballot measures in the US are different, in that they are legally 'binding'. BC is the only province to have something like this, which is why they were able to vote to repeal the HST. So a non-binding referendum is not an effective use of resources here, and isn't going to solve anything. It also isn't cheap.

You have to open up polling / ballot stations, do a bunch of signage / posting to be in compliance with the Referendum act, etc. Not to mention it's still up to the government.

Click to expand...

Fair enough. I have been schooled on the referendum deal.

Then maybe pressuring them into balancing the "task force." They have Blair to advise on police enforcement and everything he has said as a predictable and obvious bias. So counter weight him with Brian O'dea. He is out of jail now and would have great advice for the task force on the organized crime side of things. Then there is Mclellan with same hard ass deal based in complete ignorance. Maybe balance her bias with a pro weed doctor. There are plenty around...

Got a funny feeling the cunts at HC will be getting out their "Cat Litter" letter and have it dusted off for August 25. Probably wrong, but sometimes I just get a feeling.....
People like uncle bill took an oath to throw people like us into prisons and do everything they can to destroy what we call freedom, that being completely different from his term "legalization".

HC has a lot of addresses to visit if the cat shit method is invoked for control. Sure going to be a fun filled year. time to seriously look at becoming super stealthy. Data has been and is being gathered to confront those needing "harsher penalties" to be "controlled".

It would certainly be nice if there was more diversity beyond doctors / 'medical professionals' + cops.

JungleStrikeGuy said:

It would certainly be nice if there was more diversity beyond doctors / 'medical professionals' + cops.

Click to expand...

Unfortunately most of the more famous pro mj advocates come across less than professional when put into these think tanks.
Who would be a good representative of our side? Certainly not Wilcox remo or anyone of that ilk.
I'm surprised they didn't look to one of the big wigs from the legal states.

torontoke said:

Unfortunately most of the more famous pro mj advocates come across less than professional when put into these think tanks.
Who would be a good representative of our side? Certainly not Wilcox remo or anyone of that ilk.
I'm surprised they didn't look to one of the big wigs from the legal states.

Click to expand...

In that respect some of the task force isn't bad, Susan Boyd is a really good add as I've said. I agree that when it comes to a task force esque environment you need 'reasonable' more than you need 'activist'. Some people can do both, some can't.

A lot of the moderate people though are focused on the medical side since that's been the current battle for a long time. Maybe someone from the Canadian dispensary association, a vapour lounge owner, etc. To me, the task force is focusing far too much on the supply side and not enough on what happens on the ground. Where can people smoke/vape, can people open up infused restaurants, etc. People who run vapour lounges have had to come up with really creative ways for people to quasi-legally enjoy an illegal product, so they would have a great insight as to how that can transfer to fully legal.

Kirk Tousaw had an interesting observation though, that Blair et al have more bark than bite when it comes to their hard-line stance at the presser. It's certainly not good PR with the public, but I guess there's some truth to saying just because they've struck the committee, don't give much weight to the content of the presser re actual policy.

Everyone's wound up over the raids, and Blair certainly did more harm with his speech about how terrible dispensaries are. But really, it's not different from what he's said in the press before, so it's not like much has actually changed. I'd be more concerned over Philpott taking up spreading bullshit in addition to Blair.

At the end of the day we'll get substantive proof at the end of August, right now everything is 'suggestive', unfortunately mostly suggesting bad things.

JungleStrikeGuy said:

Kirk Tousaw had an interesting observation though, that Blair et al have more bark than bite when it comes to their hard-line stance at the presser. It's certainly not good PR with the public, but I guess there's some truth to saying just because they've struck the committee, don't give much weight to the content of the presser re actual policy.

Everyone's wound up over the raids, and Blair certainly did more harm with his speech about how terrible dispensaries are. But really, it's not different from what he's said in the press before, so it's not like much has actually changed. I'd be more concerned over Philpott taking up spreading bullshit in addition to Blair.

.

Click to expand...

This is what I've been saying for some time. Blair was said to be the "spokesperson" for legalization. That has nothing to do with policy making. I've been saying he is just "face" and his hard-ass reputation is a good one to mollify the right-wing nuts. Blair will be the guy who delivers the news for legalization and little more.

Same with Ann McLellan. She may be the task-force chairperson, but that doesn't mean much either. She will direct the other members in gathering info to put together a report, but again... the task force will not be writing the legislation.

Aside from Blair and McLellan...the rest of the force looks pretty solid. There's some pro(ish)-weed folk assigned and after having read the entire "Toward The Legalization, Regulation and Restriction to Marijuana" paper I am a lot more optimistic that the process will likely end up being a fairly good compromise for all concerned. But I have to admit, I am somewhat concerned now about the home-grow thing. I had hoped for allowances much like there is for beer/wine, but the rhetoric around that is disturbing.

is it true that we may be able to grow in in august ? thats what i have been told but i wanted to make sure and anyone know where i can get CBD seed, thank you

@Louisa: http://hempdepot.ca/seeds/chimera/index.html#cbdlul

CBD Lullaby regular

Indoor
We offer these seeds as a medical selection for those interested in a seed line with plants high in THC and CBD (cannabidiol), one of the medical marvel compounds produced by the cannabis species. CBD is known to attenuate the THC high; you feel a clear mental relief from pain but don’t get that “THC Zombie” burned out feeling some pure-THC plants produce when taken in the larger doses medicinal users require. CBD is a non-psychoactive cannabinoid compound that has proven anti-inflammatory, anti-anxiety, anti-metastasis/ anti-proliferative/ anti-tumor properties.

What is different about this seed line is that it’s a mixed population of plants- allowing patients, depending on their responses, to choose from the approximately 50% of the higher-THC chemotype plants, or the 50% of plants considered “high-CBD” containing no less than 4% CBD (most of these in the 9-12% THC/ 9-12% CBD range). The flavor profile has been selected towards the sweeter high-myrcene spectrum, an accessible scent palate enjoyed by many smokers both experienced and new to the medical use of cannabis flowers. These plants are excellent for extracts or edibles, and the flowers have proven beneficial to medical patients across the county. Yield is well above average.

Indoor flowering 8 to 9 weeks

louisa.sinclair said:

is it true that we may be able to grow in in august ? thats what i have been told but i wanted to make sure and anyone know where i can get CBD seed, thank you

Click to expand...

The judge says we can...we'll wait for Health Canada and see if they comply. In the meantime, email your MP and ask him or her if they think Canadian adults are capable of safely growing a plant? Ask how many folks with gov. connections stand to profit from restricting your rights.

thank you , checking site now

jafro daweedhound said:

View attachment 3724294

Click to expand...

Where'd you get the pic of Rona?

VIANARCHRIS said:

Where'd you get the pic of Rona?

Click to expand...

that's before she shaved.

VIANARCHRIS said:

Where'd you get the pic of Rona?

Click to expand...

She's gotta purdy mouth....

Bet she has the greek hair strip up the crack of her ass.