Kellyanne: Wiretap Solved..It Was The Microwave!

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...y-surveillance-trump-campaign-wider/99109170/

What a media whore..she's just like Trump, she can't stand it when no one talks to her:

According to Kellyanne Conway. It's a fact of modern life. I wonder if General Electric, Samsung and the other manufacturers of microwaves know this. I just got a new one last Fall. Should I give it the finger when I heat up my soup later, knowing that Steve Bannon is probably watching me?

She says the “surveillance” may be broader than even Trump suggested.

In a wide-ranging interview Sunday at her home in Alpine, where she lives with her husband — a possible nominee for U.S. solicitor general — and their four children, Conway, who managed Trump’s presidential campaign before taking the job as one of the president's closest advisers, suggested that the alleged monitoring of activities at Trump’s campaign headquarters at Trump Tower in Manhattan may have involved far more than wiretapping.

“What I can say is there are many ways to surveil each other,” Conway said as the Trump presidency marked its 50th day in office during the weekend. “You can surveil someone through their phones, certainly through their television sets — any number of ways.”

Conway went on to say that the monitoring could be done with “microwaves that turn into cameras,” adding: “We know this is a fact of modern life.”



Conway suggests even wider surveillance of Trump campaign.
 
Last edited:
MIT's 3-D Microwave Camera Can See Through Walls

Visible light is all well and good for things like eyeballs, but here at IEEE, we do our best to cover the entire spectrum. As always, we’re especially interested in anything that confers superhero-like abilities, like X-ray vision, or in this case, M-wave vision, which sounds even more futuristic. At MIT, they’ve been working on a prototype for a time of flight microwave camera which can be used to image objects through walls, in 3-D.

A microwave camera is sort of like a cross between a visible light camera and a radar imaging system, incorporating some of the advantages of each. Like radar, microwaves don’t really notice things like darkness or fog or walls, but unlike radar they’re not confused by the kinds of angled surfaces that make the stealth fighter so stealthy. Radar systems also tend to be big, complex, low resolution, and expensive. By taking a more camera-like approach to radio frequency imaging, essentially treating microwaves like waves of light and using a passive reflector like a lens, MIT has been able to leverage computational-imaging techniques to develop a low cost, high resolution imaging system.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/...its-3d-microwave-camera-can-see-through-walls



I think she misunderstood exactly how it works.
 
MIT's 3-D Microwave Camera Can See Through Walls

Visible light is all well and good for things like eyeballs, but here at IEEE, we do our best to cover the entire spectrum. As always, we’re especially interested in anything that confers superhero-like abilities, like X-ray vision, or in this case, M-wave vision, which sounds even more futuristic. At MIT, they’ve been working on a prototype for a time of flight microwave camera which can be used to image objects through walls, in 3-D.

A microwave camera is sort of like a cross between a visible light camera and a radar imaging system, incorporating some of the advantages of each. Like radar, microwaves don’t really notice things like darkness or fog or walls, but unlike radar they’re not confused by the kinds of angled surfaces that make the stealth fighter so stealthy. Radar systems also tend to be big, complex, low resolution, and expensive. By taking a more camera-like approach to radio frequency imaging, essentially treating microwaves like waves of light and using a passive reflector like a lens, MIT has been able to leverage computational-imaging techniques to develop a low cost, high resolution imaging system.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/...its-3d-microwave-camera-can-see-through-walls



I think she misunderstood exactly how it works.

It's a prototype, moron.
 
MIT's 3-D Microwave Camera Can See Through Walls

Visible light is all well and good for things like eyeballs, but here at IEEE, we do our best to cover the entire spectrum. As always, we’re especially interested in anything that confers superhero-like abilities, like X-ray vision, or in this case, M-wave vision, which sounds even more futuristic. At MIT, they’ve been working on a prototype for a time of flight microwave camera which can be used to image objects through walls, in 3-D.

A microwave camera is sort of like a cross between a visible light camera and a radar imaging system, incorporating some of the advantages of each. Like radar, microwaves don’t really notice things like darkness or fog or walls, but unlike radar they’re not confused by the kinds of angled surfaces that make the stealth fighter so stealthy. Radar systems also tend to be big, complex, low resolution, and expensive. By taking a more camera-like approach to radio frequency imaging, essentially treating microwaves like waves of light and using a passive reflector like a lens, MIT has been able to leverage computational-imaging techniques to develop a low cost, high resolution imaging system.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/...its-3d-microwave-camera-can-see-through-walls



I think she misunderstood exactly how it works.
So do you believe that Obama had trump under surveillance and that trump has evidence he is not putting forward?
 
It's a prototype, moron.


2 years ago.

It's a working model that can easily be made available to spies. ;)

You post this shit thinking you're on to something and it turns out there is some basis to it.

How's that lawsuit working out? You know, the one where they forced you to miss the bus. The one where you were going to get rich off of.

How does it feel to be more hated than me?
 
So do you believe that Obama had trump under surveillance and that trump has evidence he is not putting forward?


Do I "believe"? I try not to jump to any "conclusions" until all the evidence is released. So far I haven't seen much evidence.
 
Back
Top