January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Jan. 6 panel lays out inquiries for Jordan, extends subpoena deadline
The Jan. 6 committee has extended the deadline for Rep. Jim Jordan (R) to comply with its subpoena, laying out in a letter its fullest accounting yet of the information it would like to discuss with the Ohio congressman.

The correspondence to Jordan comes after he wrote a six-page letter to the panel demanding to see the bulk of evidence it has compiled concerning his actions after the 2020 election and leading up to Jan. 6.

The letter outlines eight topics on inquiry, including previously unreported efforts by Jordan to reach then-Attorney General Bill Barr the day before the 2020 election was called and to speak with then Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows about “efforts to pressure Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolfe (D) to audit his state’s election results.”

Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) points to prior comments from Jordan saying he would only be able to answer questions about actions beyond the scope of his official duties.

“With all due respect, we believe you can provide much more than that,” Thompson wrote.

The letter, first published by Breitbart News, otherwise creates a timeline of Jordan’s actions over the roughly two month between the election and the certification of its results.

It points to previously reported meetings Jordan attended at the White House to plan its strategy for Jan. 6, as well as another meeting with Trump campaign layers. Both took place in mid-November.

It also notes an interview with the Department of Justice’s former deputy attorney general who said that former President Trump had told officials there in December that Jordan was “trying to find out what happened” with regards to his allegations of voter fraud.

Later that month he would participate in another meeting with the Trump legal team and lawmakers to discuss the strategy for opposing the certification of the election results.

Finally, it notes that Jordan spoke with the president for about 10 minutes around 9:30 on the morning of Jan. 6 and again after being evacuated to safety from the riot.

“Given that you ‘have said all along I have nothing to hide,’ we expect you would be willing to clarify these statements for us,” Thompson wrote.

Thompson’s letter otherwise picks apart legal arguments from Jordan’s letter last week, which repeated oft-used Republican arguments that the committee was not properly formed and does not have a legislative purpose. All have largely been rejected by the courts.

“It is thus no surprise that all three district courts that have considered the argument you are making have rejected it,” Thompson wrote.
it's just about time to start sending out some indictments, hope jordan's is in the first batch
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
This will make some people shit their pants, or panties.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

He helped decode texts from January 6th. What he found scared him
98,951 views Jun 1, 2022 Denver Riggleman, a former Republican congressman who helped the January 6 committee link text messages sent to and from Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, tells CNN's Anderson Cooper what scared him about what he uncovered about the January 6 insurrection.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
It was the attack on the capitol that fucked them all, they probably would have got away with it, but J6 caused a lot of rocks to be rolled over and the slimy things came to light. Donald fucked them all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Plan To Keep Trump In Power Is A 'Crime' Says Conway
76,412 views Jun 1, 2022 “This was a multi-faceted conspiracy to do whatever it took to stop the counting of electoral votes on January 6. And that has to be a crime. If that’s not a crime, nothing is under these statutes,” says George Conway, discussing the newly released memo sketching out how Pence could halt the certification of Biden’s win.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Meadows text logs present dramatic timeline of pleas for help on Jan. 6
78,304 views Jun 2, 2022 In a CNN exclusive, Jamie Gangel reports that within minutes of the US Capitol breach on January 6, 2021, text messages flooded the cell phone of White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

With J6 hearings to begin 6/9, we finally learn that DOJ is criminally investigating Trump. Why now?

35,725 views Jun 2, 2022 It seems we have waited an eternity for the Department of Justice to initiate a criminal investigation of Donald Trump and his co-conspirators for their crimes against the United States culminating in the January 6 insurrection. We now know that the DOJ is, in fact, using the grand jury to criminally investigate Trump. We know this for a number of reasons, including the revelation that Peter Navarro has been subpoenaed to the grand jury and required to divulge all evidence of his communications with Trump. As Rolling Stone reported, "The DOJ's Jan. 6 Investigation Appears to be Closing in on Trump."

The question is, why now? Why, 18 months after the Trump-incited attack on the US Capitol are we just now learning of a federal investigation into Trump? One reason may be, the American people are about to see for themselves the evidence of Donald Trump's crimes, courtesy of the public hearings regarding the insurreciton set to begin on June 9. Once the American people see the evidence for themselves, there undoubtedly will be a public outcry demanding that Trump be held accountable for his crimes.

As Newsweek reported: "DOJ Accelerating Trump Investigations Ahead of Jan. 6 Hearings." This video explores the likely reasons for this "acceleration."

Newsweek article:

...
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Navarro fucking himself, again... He definitely looks stressed, like a rat caught in a trap. I think those top level people who didn't cooperate with the J6 are getting grand jury subpoenas to fill in the blanks for the J6 panel by getting the answers they cannot. When they put all the pieces together and the panel completes their report there will be more grand juries and possibly a recommendation of a special independent counsel?

This is a big massive hub and spoke conspiracy involving hundreds, if not thousands of people, so off loading it onto an independent special counsel would make the most sense, DOJ has it's plate full. Most of their work will be done already by the J6 panel and the grand jury might start calling the reluctant congress people and senators in for a chat too. The special independent counsel would then proceed to clean up the details and start putting them all away as part of a massive hub and spoke conspiracy with several plots and schemes, including the capitol insurrection.

Then again maybe Garland wants them all to himself, wants to make some examples, give some warnings and scare the living shit out of others. Shove the big lie down their throats until they choke on it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Navarro Speaks Out As First Trump Aide Facing Criminal Subpoena For Jan. 6 | MSNBC Exclusive
20,492 views Jun 2, 2022 DOJ prosecutors have served former Trump White House aide Peter Navarro a criminal grand jury subpoena after he spoke out about his plot to keep Donald Trump in office and was held in contempt of Congress for defying the Jan. 6 committee. This is the most serious legal move regarding the insurrection the Justice Department has taken against anyone who worked in the Trump White House. In his first interview since receiving the subpoena and on the day he was supposed to testify before the grand jury, Navarro joins MSNBC’s Ari Melber to discuss the subpoena. Navarro tells Melber he has “responded” to the DOJ about the subpoena, but dodges questions regarding whether he has provided any documents to the DOJ.



See Trump Aide Navarro Confronted On Air: You Know Investigators Can Hear You?
51,364 views Jun 2, 2022 Former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro joins MSNBC’s Ari Melber for his first interview after he was served a criminal grand jury subpoena by DOJ prosecutors. Melber challenges Navarro’s claim that he cannot cooperate with the Jan. 6 probe because Donald Trump has not “waived” his “executive privilege,” asking Navarro “you do realize these investigators can hear you when you talk on TV?"
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Gee it would be too bad if some of those lunatic congress people won their primaries only to be indicted before the election for sedition. No election moratoriums over this shit I should think, we are talking about insurrection, sedition and treason among elected officials after all, perhaps the gloves should come off?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus

With J6 hearings to begin 6/9, we finally learn that DOJ is criminally investigating Trump. Why now?

35,725 views Jun 2, 2022 It seems we have waited an eternity for the Department of Justice to initiate a criminal investigation of Donald Trump and his co-conspirators for their crimes against the United States culminating in the January 6 insurrection. We now know that the DOJ is, in fact, using the grand jury to criminally investigate Trump. We know this for a number of reasons, including the revelation that Peter Navarro has been subpoenaed to the grand jury and required to divulge all evidence of his communications with Trump. As Rolling Stone reported, "The DOJ's Jan. 6 Investigation Appears to be Closing in on Trump."

The question is, why now? Why, 18 months after the Trump-incited attack on the US Capitol are we just now learning of a federal investigation into Trump? One reason may be, the American people are about to see for themselves the evidence of Donald Trump's crimes, courtesy of the public hearings regarding the insurreciton set to begin on June 9. Once the American people see the evidence for themselves, there undoubtedly will be a public outcry demanding that Trump be held accountable for his crimes.

As Newsweek reported: "DOJ Accelerating Trump Investigations Ahead of Jan. 6 Hearings." This video explores the likely reasons for this "acceleration."

Newsweek article:

...
pyoong! PYOOONGG from the great dam of ice

1654229959110.gif
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Well that didn't take long, on TV with Ari Meber and the next day this!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Well that didn't take long, on TV with Ari Meber and the next day this!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pyoongyoongyoongg
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
He can wear it as a badge of honour. But that fades when you are looking at a year in jail.
He's looking at a lot more than a year in the slammer, just with what we know and what he confessed to on TV! Clamming up won't help him, there are plenty of rats and cutthroats among that bunch, they are all worms, then there are the documents, texts and emails.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
He can wear it as a badge of honour. But that fades when you are looking at a year in jail.
If other people close to Trump got a pocket pardon, like Rudy, who would squeal his head off, then Peter will be pissed along with all the other suckers. If he does have a pocket pardon, now would be a good time to haul it out.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
He's looking at a lot more than a year in the slammer, just with what we know and what he confessed to on TV! Clamming up won't help him, there are plenty of rats and cutthroats among that bunch, they are all worms, then there are the documents, texts and emails.
No, that is just for not showing up.

Navarro lashes out at Jan. 6 investigations in court
Peter Navarro, the former White House trade advisor who was charged this week with contempt of Congress, was combative on Friday at his initial court appearance, lashing out at Congress and federal law enforcement following his arrest for defying the House Jan. 6 committee’s subpoena.

During the court hearing, Navarro insisted on representing himself as he faces two misdemeanor contempt counts and used the time to rail against the various investigators who have sought his testimony and records.

“Who are these people,” Navarro said. “This is not America. I mean, I was a distinguished public servant for four years and nobody ever questioned my ethics. And they’re treating me in this fashion.”

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
No, that is just for not showing up.

Navarro lashes out at Jan. 6 investigations in court
Peter Navarro, the former White House trade advisor who was charged this week with contempt of Congress, was combative on Friday at his initial court appearance, lashing out at Congress and federal law enforcement following his arrest for defying the House Jan. 6 committee’s subpoena.

During the court hearing, Navarro insisted on representing himself as he faces two misdemeanor contempt counts and used the time to rail against the various investigators who have sought his testimony and records.

“Who are these people,” Navarro said. “This is not America. I mean, I was a distinguished public servant for four years and nobody ever questioned my ethics. And they’re treating me in this fashion.”

Navarro said he was arrested as he was boarding a plane to Nashville on Friday on his way to make a television appearance. He accused federal law enforcement of “prosecutorial misconduct” for the way he was taken into custody.

“There are bigger things at play than whether I go to prison,” he said. “And that’s why I’m standing here.”

Navarro, who for four years advised former President Trump on trade policy, faces up to a year in jail and $100,000 in fines on the two counts of contempt of Congress.

He had refused to comply with a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 select committee subpoena issued in February, and earlier this week he filed a civil suit against the panel challenging their authority to issue the demands.

In his civil complaint, Navarro revealed he also received a grand jury subpoena as part of the Justice Department’s own Jan. 6 investigation.

The agency is seeking “any communications with former President Trump and/or his counsel or representatives,” according to a copy of the subpoena that was obtained by The Guardian.

Criminal defendants are typically advised against representing themselves due in part to the complex legal and procedural issues at play, but Navarro said Friday that he doesn’t want to “spend his retirement savings on lawyers.”

Federal Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui also advised him that he could be at risk of incriminating himself with his comments in court.

“There’s a lot of attention upon you in this case,” Faruqui said. “Every time you speak just remember it could be something that’s used against you in court. It’s difficult, I’m sure, because you want for people to see that not only presume this, but the reasons why you are innocent. Every time that you’re speaking, it could mean potentially putting yourself at risk.”
It is just the beginning and before he does time for this, he will be indicted for other things, things he is trying to avoid.


Trump aide Peter Navarro indicted for contempt of Congress; what's next for defendant Navarro?
2,609 views Jun 3, 2022 Peter Navarro, aide to former president Donald Trump, defied a congressional subpoena seeking information about Trump's involvement in the insurrection and other efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. On April 6, Congress voted Navarro in contempt and referred him to the Department of Justice for prosecution. Thereafter, the Department of Justice subpoenaed Navarro to appear before the grand jury. Navarro was scheduled to appear yesterday, June 2. But today, June 3, a grand jury indictment was unsealed charging Navarro with two counts of contempt of cCongress. Here is a discussion of the timing of today's charges and what is likely in store for Peter Navarro.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

‘Very bad news for Peter Navarro’: Ex-Trump adviser indicted
162,514 views Jun 3, 2022 A federal grand jury has indicted former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro for contempt of Congress after he refused to cooperate in the House January 6 committee's investigation. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig breaks down the significance of the indictment.
 
Top