Humane Execution
- Thread starter Nutes and Nugs
- Start date
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Capital punishment is not murder. Murder has a legal definition. Yours is not in line with the legal definition.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
I voted for claw hammer.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
londonfog
Well-Known Member
unless you get it wrong ...then it's murder
londonfog
Well-Known Member
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
I'm not a whiny little bitch. If that's what you're asking.
Once again, Everyone dies. Deal with it.
Last edited:
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
accomplices to a felony which results in a dea th are ALL subject to murder charges, including murder 1 and the death penalty (where applicable) even if the felons were not directly responsible for the death (example: old man has a heart attack while the bank is being robbed = murder charges (including murder 1) for all involved in the crime)
thus tafero was NOT "innocent"
londonfog
Well-Known Member
he was innocent of murder. The one that pulled the trigger did not get the death sentence, because they thought he was innocent of murder until he confessed. Are you really that naive to think that someone innocent of the crime accused were actually innocent. poor dear. Santa Claus lives with the Easter Bunny and Jesus loves you.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
he was NOT innocent, he was as much a part of the crime as the button man, he just didnt roll over on his accomplices.
all 3 should have stretched a rope for their crimes, but limp wristed prosecutors love cutting deals.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
I suggest you go and read the story. Have a great day/night
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the story implies he didnt hold the button man's smoking gun so the shooter could drive the carjacked getaway ride?
he didnt participate in the shooting or the getaway carjacking?
it wasnt his gun the shooter used?
you must read funny
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
As far as 'most humane', I'd say guillotine.
I think only cases with undeniable evidence should be considered for capital punishment. If there's a video, and witnesses and it's exceptionally brutal or something along those lines.
...but why not the firing squad? .308 rounds are cheap and very effective. Removing the head would probably piss a lot of people off, but the death would be quick and painless.
Couple Valiums and a few rounds of .308 would make for very frugal prisoner execution.
I think only cases with undeniable evidence should be considered for capital punishment. If there's a video, and witnesses and it's exceptionally brutal or something along those lines.
...but why not the firing squad? .308 rounds are cheap and very effective. Removing the head would probably piss a lot of people off, but the death would be quick and painless.
Couple Valiums and a few rounds of .308 would make for very frugal prisoner execution.
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Why should it be humane?
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
Because we can think of reasons for it to be humane. You're essentially asking "why should people be good?".....
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Was the way the murder killed their victim humane!
public executions!!
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
It would be the #1 show...
Ceepea
Well-Known Member
So, because one person is an asshole, everyone should be an asshole? We're talking about executing someone, there's no reason to torture them too.
dont tell your kids about the boogy man, show them someone being hung as a thief/adulterier.whatever, and watch them tow the line.
