UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what did you think their function wasThe DCCC is obviously influencing the election by showing support and financially backing one candidate
what did you think their function wasThe DCCC is obviously influencing the election by showing support and financially backing one candidate
why do you address a murdering dictator as "mr putin" but refer to the democratic nominee for president as "shillary"When these people actually get perp walked out of their offices I'll cheer. So far, it's American corruption as usual.
It's amazing how much time, effort and column inches you spending bashing Bernie instead of championing someone- anyone- else.You aren't a progressive. You are an idealistic liberal just like Bernie. Bernie hasn't gotten anything done in 12 years as a Senator.
Do you call Jerry Brown a progressive? I do. He's nothing like Bernie and his cult. Jerry has done a fabulous job for California. I'd most certainly call him a liberal progressive. He too didn't support that ludicrous unfinished, unfunded health care bill that you so ardently wanted last year. That piece of shit legislation would have been the downfall of the Democratic Party in California too.
Damn right the DCCC are putting their support behind Democratic candidates they think can win. But they aren't choosing them, the voters will when they go to the polls. If the candidates that you like are so good then they will win. No excuses. Those are for losers.
The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing thatWe have this thing called an election. People campaign to win people's votes.
Derp.i don;t blame the democrats for not supporting candidates that you want, you're a bigot that calls people "fa***ots"
The more people we tell about this, the less effective the tactic will be, no matter how much they spend on it.The DCCC are putting their support behind Democratic candidates... but they aren't choosing them... the voters will...
How are the voters choosing the candidate legitimately when the DCCC is putting their support behind them?
The DCCC is obviously influencing the election by showing support and financially backing one candidate over another
Right. It's okay to rig the primary and then turn around and say that's evidence of anything but Democratic Party corruption.We have this thing called an election. People campaign to win people's votes. If you progressives can't win the primary how can you possibly expect to win in November against real opposition.
Oh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.why do you address a murdering dictator as "mr putin" but refer to the democratic nominee for president as "shillary"
you're just defending the guy that clls people "fa***ots" because you call people "fa***ots" tooDerp.
Useless argument from a useless argumentarian.
That's because they actually think it's acceptable behavior.The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing that
It's a fair questionOh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.
You do this a lot- you do it even more when you're losing the argument.
Sad!
that's your spin. From what I see, the DCCC is channeling legal contributions to candidates they think are most likely to win. From what I see, Our Revolution isn't doing a good job of winning seats. They are 2 for 17 this year.The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing that
just find it unsettling that you would address a murdering dictator respectfully but not the first woman ever to be nominated for the presidency of the united statesOh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.
You do this a lot- you do it even more when you're losing the argument.
Sad!
No it isn't.It's a fair question
so your strategy is to be even more annoying, whiny, preachy, and spammyThe more people we tell about this, the less effective the tactic will be, no matter how much they spend on it.
Right. More circular logic in the banal attempt to legitimise blatant corruption.that's your spin. From what I see, the DCCC is channeling legal contributions to candidates they think are most likely to win. From what I see, Our Revolution isn't doing a good job of winning seats. They are 2 for 17 this year.
If your sorry ass candidates can't scrape up enough money to fight and win the primary then they can just go home.
I'm happy with you thinking I don't want Bernie as president. That just might be true.It's amazing how much time, effort and column inches you spending bashing Bernie instead of championing someone- anyone- else.
In fact, it's downright suspicious.
It's evidence that you know who actually has the ideological initiative but you can't bring yourself to admit it.
So keep bashing without offering any solutions or candidates- and as long as you do, people like @Padawanbater2 and I will keep pointing out how flawed you and the establishment party are.
I know, you really can't stand it when we're right.so your strategy is to be even more annoying, whiny, preachy, and spammy
If your sorry ass candidates can't run a competitive campaign during the primary, they deserve to lose. That's the way it is. Suck it up, buttercup.Right. More circular logic in the banal attempt to legitimise blatant corruption.
You spend all your time bashing him.I'm happy with you thinking I don't want Bernie as president. That just might be true.