Here

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
It was like an orange hydrogen dust trhat smelled like diamonds and tasted like ultraviolet thunder with a hint of purple. Everyone started to gather. We slid down N shaped Z's diagonally. The child in us smiling infinitely in all directions.



:bigjoint:

You are there. You can go in an infinite number of directions. Which way will you go? Where will you end up? Who will you love? Who will you hurt?

Is that really the road you are gonna take?

Focus. What will happen next? Then after that? Then so on and so forth? Do you see it now!! :bigjoint:

Yes, now you've got it. Hold it. Examine it. Change it.


I do my part by staying hidden. Removing myself. Inserting packets of light only when necessary.

I am a greeter and a healer. Welcome!

[video=youtube;BqQ1WZXQn9A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqQ1WZXQn9A[/video]
 

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the concept of deconstructivist culture. If subdialectic capitalism holds, we have to choose between the neodialectic paradigm of expression and postcultural nationalism. Thus, the primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the common ground between sexual identity and class.

Derrida uses the term ‘subdialectic capitalism’ to denote not situationism, but subsituationism. It could be said that the main theme of d’Erlette’s model of the neodialectic paradigm of expression is the role of the participant as artist.

Lyotard’s analysis of the capitalist paradigm of context suggests that society has intrinsic meaning, given that language is interchangeable with reality. However, Wilson implies that we have to choose between subdialectic capitalism and capitalist and the neodialectic paradigm of expression.

“Sexual identity is part of the failure of sexuality,” says Sartre; however, according to Dietrich, it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the failure of sexuality, but rather the genre, and therefore the paradigm, of sexual identity. An abundance of discourses concerning the collapse, and eventually the fatal flaw, of posttextual class may be revealed. In a sense, the premise of constructivism holds that the Constitution is responsible for the status quo.

Lyotard uses the term ‘the neodialectic paradigm of expression’ to denote the bridge between class and society. In a sense, the main theme of the works of Stone is a neotextual paradox.

Sontag uses the term ‘subdialectic capitalism’ to denote the role of the writer as participant. It could be said that the paradigm, and thus the genre, of constructivism which is a central theme of Stone’s Heaven and Earth is also evident in Platoon, although in a more self-sufficient sense.

Marx’s essay on subdialectic capitalism suggests that narrativity is capable of deconstruction, but only if the premise of the neodialectic paradigm of expression is valid. Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of subdialectic capitalism to deconstruct archaic, sexist perceptions of sexual identity.

Several narratives concerning not theory per se, but pretheory may be discovered. Therefore, Sartre uses the term ‘Lyotardist narrative’ to denote the role of the writer as poet.
 

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
no...but there's a giant cloud in here with me....>.>

Basically, all I'm saying is that Lyotard’s critique of the postdialectic paradigm of reality suggests that consensus must come from the collective unconscious, but only if the premise of neopatriarchial theory is valid; if that is not the case, we can assume that society has objective value....it' simple really.
 

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
That Which Concerns a Prince on the Subject of the Art of War
The Prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select anything else for his study, than war and its rules and discipline; for this is the sole art that belongs to him who rules, and it is of such force that it not only upholds those who are born princes, but it often enables men to rise from a private station to that rank. And, on the contrary, it is seen that when princes have thought more of ease than of arms they have lost their states. And the first cause of your losing it is to neglect this art; and what enables you to acquire a state is to be master of the art. Francesco Sforza, though being martial, from a private person became Duke of Milan; and the sons, through avoiding the hardships and troubles of arms, from dukes became private persons. For among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised, and this is one of those ignominies against which a prince ought to guard himself, as is shown later on.

Concerning Things for Which Men, and Especially Princes, are Blamed
It remains now to see what ought to be the rules of conduct for a prince toward subject and friends. And as I know that many have written on this point, I expect I shall be considered presumptuous in mentioning it again, especially as in discussing it I shall depart from the methods of other people. But it being my intention to write a thing which shall be useful to him to apprehends it, it appears to me more appropriate to follow up the real truth of a matter than the imagination of it; for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen, because how one lives is so far distant from how one ought to live, that he who neglects what is done for what ought to be done, sooner effects his ruin than his preservation; for a man who wishes to act entirely up to his professions of virtue soon meets with what destroys him among so much that is evil.
Hence, it is necessary for a prince wishing to hold his own to know how to do wrong, and to make use of it or not according to necessity. Therefore, putting on one side imaginary things concerning a prince, and discussing those which are real, I say that all men when they are spoken of, and chiefly princes for being more highly placed, are remarkable for some of those qualities which bring them either blame or praise; and thus it is that one is reputed liberal, another miserly...; one is reputed generous, one rapacious; one cruel, one compassionate; one faithless, another faithful.... And I know that every one will confess that it would be most praiseworthy in a prince to exhibit all the above qualities that are considered good; but because they can neither be entirely possessed nor observed, for human conditions do not permit it, it is necessary for him to be sufficiently prident that he may know how to avoid the reproach of those vices which would lose him his state...



Concerning Cruelty and Clemency, and Whether it is Better to be Loved than Feared
Upon this a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you successed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by nobility or greatness of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserved you by a dread of punishment which never fails.
Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he is not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women.


The Prince - Niccolo Machiavelli
 

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
No....If one examines the deconstructive paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a choice: either accept the constructive paradigm of consensus or conclude that the media is part of the stasis of reality, given that the premise of subdialectic semantic theory is invalid.
 

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
however you like....the subject is interpolated into a constructive paradigm of consensus that includes reality as a reality, that's all I know.
 

ChubbySoap

Well-Known Member
see what i mean?
we have to choose between prestructuralist narrative and the capitalist paradigm of reality...that's simply not fair!

D:
 

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
[video=youtube;KZeiSKnhOBc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZeiSKnhOBc[/video]

[video=youtube;iRh5qy09nNw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRh5qy09nNw[/video]
 

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
[video=youtube;TGrDj5vFefQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGrDj5vFefQ&feature=related[/video]

[video=youtube;G5eE1ZUnkzs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5eE1ZUnkzs[/video]
 

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
The 2011 Tōhoku earthquake, officially named the Great East Japan Earthquake,[6][7] was a magnitude 9.0 (Mw) undersea megathrust earthquake off the coast of Japan that occurred at 14:46 JST (05:46 UTC) on Friday, 11 March 2011,[2][3][8] with the epicenter approximately 72 km (45 mi) east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tōhoku and the hypocenter at an underwater depth of approximately 32 km (20 mi).[2][9] It was the most powerful known earthquake to have hit Japan, and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in the world overall since modern record-keeping began in 1900.[8][10][11] The earthquake triggered extremely destructive tsunami waves of up to 38 meters (124 ft)[12] that struck Japan, in some cases traveling up to 10 km (6 mi) inland.[13] In addition to loss of life and destruction of infrastructure, the tsunami caused a number of nuclear accidents, of which by far the most serious was an ongoing level 7 event and 20 km (12 mi) evacuation zone around the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant (see Fukushima I nuclear accidents). In Japan, the overall event is known as the "Eastern Japan Great Earthquake Disaster" (東日本大震災 Higashi Nihon Daishinsai?)[14][fn 1] The overall cost could exceed $300 billion, making it the most expensive natural disaster on record.[15][16][17]
The Japanese National Police Agency has confirmed 14,755 deaths,[4][5] 5,279 injured,[4][5] and 10,706 people missing[4][5] across eighteen prefectures, as well as over 125,000 buildings damaged or destroyed.[4][5] The earthquake and tsunami caused extensive and severe structural damage in Japan, including heavy damage to roads and railways as well as fires in many areas, and a dam collapse.[13][18] Around 4.4 million households in northeastern Japan were left without electricity and 1.5 million without water.[19] Many electrical generators were taken down, and at least three nuclear reactors suffered explosions due to hydrogen gas that had built up within their outer containment buildings after cooling system failure. Residents within a 20 km (12 mi) radius of the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant and a 10 km (6 mi) radius of the Fukushima II Nuclear Power Plant were evacuated. In addition, the U.S. recommended that its citizens evacuate up to 80 km (50 mi) of the plant.[20]
Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan said, "In the 65 years after the end of World War II, this is the toughest and the most difficult crisis for Japan."[21] The earthquake moved Honshu 2.4 m (7.9 ft) east and shifted the Earth on its axis by almost 10 cm (3.9 in).[22][23] Early estimates placed insured losses from the earthquake alone at US$14.5 to $34.6 billion.[24] The Bank of Japan offered ¥15 trillion (US$183 billion) to the banking system on 14 March in an effort to normalize market conditions.[25]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami#cite_note-25
[video=youtube;-AmvqIhgGec]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AmvqIhgGec[/video]
 

HIDDEN42O

Active Member
[video=youtube;7AUeM8MbaIk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AUeM8MbaIk[/video]

[video=youtube;MWT51807cyM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWT51807cyM[/video]
 
Top