Healthcare.gov data released

lifegoesonbrah · Nov 14, 2013

Oh boy, even NPR is disappointed:

The Health Care Numbers Are Out, And They're Disappointing

About 100,00 people enrolled in health coverage, around a quarter of those from healthcare.gov.

Way to go liberals, you managed to dis-enroll significantly more people from Health coverage than signed up.

According to CBS

This is so fucked, even the democratic loyalist in Congress have to give the President ultimatums in order to get him to fix this disaster that he has created.

[h=3]Democrats losing patience with Obamacare - CNN.com[/h]
So basically, Obama has truly failed at his biggest campaign promise that he put out there, to get more people healthcare coverage. Just like the rest of the bullshit that he told us (GITMO, WARS, DRUG WAR, CIVIL RIGHTS), he has managed to do the opposite as usual and actually reduce the number of Americans with health coverage.

Way to go losers. bongsmilie

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/11/20131113a.html

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

lifegoesonbrah said:
About 100,00 people enrolled in health coverage,...Obama has truly failed at his biggest campaign promise that he put out there, to get more people healthcare coverage.

NPR is just more liberal media spin. only 123 people signed up in the first month.

https://www.rollitup.org/politics/750945-only-123-people-sign-up.html

:lol:

lifegoesonbrah · Nov 14, 2013

you got nothin.

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

lifegoesonbrah said:
you got nothin.

only 123 people.

what a failure, right?

Ringsixty · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
NPR is just more liberal media spin. only 123 people signed up in the first month.

https://www.rollitup.org/politics/750945-only-123-people-sign-up.html

Is that all you got as a response? Come on Bucky you can do better.

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

Ringsixty said:
Is that all you got as a response? Come on Bucky you can do better.

failure can always be judged in the first month.

you guys are right.

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
failure can always be judged in the first month.

you guys are right.

Would you call it a success or about what you were expecting?

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
Would you call it a success or about what you were expecting?

123 people, dude.

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
123 people, dude.

So we beat a small state that had full employment? That's nice.

Are you happy with the rollout so far?

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
So we beat a small state that had full employment? That's nice.

Are you happy with the rollout so far?

about 6.5 million to 300+ million. 48x the population, 123 signups.

123 x 49 = 6027 < 100000

clearly, we can discern from the first month (even the first day!) the success of a program.

thus spake the idiots.

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
about 6.5 million to 300+ million. 48x the population, 123 signups.

123 x 49 = 6027 < 100000

clearly, we can discern from the first month (even the first day!) the success of a program.

thus spake the idiots.

Well you could have just yes, you didn't have to call yourself an idiot.

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
Well you could have just yes, you didn't have to call yourself an idiot.

how stupid do you think people look now after mocking enrollments in the first (and thus least urgent) month of enrollment for romneycare, especially now that something like 98-99% of people in that state are insured now?

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
how stupid do you think people look now after mocking enrollments in the first (and thus least urgent) month of enrollment for romneycare, especially now that something like 98-99% of people in that state are insured now?

People were mocking enrollments because people COULDN'T enroll on our glitchy billion dollar web site. If this is your standard for a successful rollout then you have a career in government ahead of you.

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
People were mocking enrollments because people COULDN'T enroll on our glitchy billion dollar web site. If this is your standard for a successful rollout then you have a career in government ahead of you.

how did you get "successful rollout" out of anything i've said?

if you reading compensation weren't so potato, you'd realize that the point i am making is that it is plainly retarded to judge the success of a program in its forst month, and i gave empirical evidence that demonstrates how stupid you will end up looking if you try to do so.

beennowhere takes it to the next level, he goes by the first day. i'm just glad you're not him intellectually, even though you are the exact same as him politically.

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
how did you get "successful rollout" out of anything i've said?

if you reading compensation weren't so potato, you'd realize that the point i am making is that it is plainly retarded to judge the success of a program in its forst month, and i gave empirical evidence that demonstrates how stupid you will end up looking if you try to do so.

beennowhere takes it to the next level, he goes by the first day. i'm just glad you're not him intellectually, even though you are the exact same as him politically.

So you're saying it was an unsuccessful rollout? It's hard to get a straight answer from you. Are you happy with the results so far, I mean being that they are so much better than Romneycare and all (that you have continually pointed out). How was I supposed to surmise you were unhappy?

Let's try this, 1-5 with 1 being wildly unsuccessful disaster, 3 being about what you expected and 5 being wildly successful where would you put it?

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
Let's try this, 1-5 with 1 being wildly unsuccessful disaster, 3 being about what you expected and 5 being wildly successful where would you put it?

123.

seriously dude. don't be so fucking stupid.

ginwilly · Nov 14, 2013

UncleBuck said:
123.

seriously dude. don't be so fucking stupid.

That's about how I would score it too. 1 being wildly unsuccessful, 2 because SOME were able to wade through and 3 for it being about what i expected. Thanks for answering a question truthfully.

UncleBuck · Nov 14, 2013

ginwilly said:
That's about how I would score it too. 1 being wildly unsuccessful, 2 because SOME were able to wade through and 3 for it being about what i expected. Thanks for answering a question truthfully.

congratulations, you have brought him out of hibernation.

hope you're happy.

ginwilly · Nov 15, 2013

Not happy, but mildly amused at you not having enough integrity or balls to admit it's a not a success at this point. You can't even give an opinion other than Romneycare...
It's OK bucky, the only one who would call you a racist for saying it's not going well is you.

lifegoesonbrah · Nov 15, 2013

UncleBuck said:
about 6.5 million to 300+ million. 48x the population, 123 signups.

123 x 49 = 6027 < 100000

clearly, we can discern from the first month (even the first day!) the success of a program.

thus spake the idiots.

100,000 - 2,000,000 = bad for Merica.

Healthcare.gov data released

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads