Healthcare.gov data released

lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
Oh boy, even NPR is disappointed:

The Health Care Numbers Are Out, And They're Disappointing

About 100,00 people enrolled in health coverage, around a quarter of those from healthcare.gov.

Way to go liberals, you managed to dis-enroll significantly more people from Health coverage than signed up.

According to CBS

This is so fucked, even the democratic loyalist in Congress have to give the President ultimatums in order to get him to fix this disaster that he has created.

[h=3]Democrats losing patience with Obamacare - CNN.com[/h]
So basically, Obama has truly failed at his biggest campaign promise that he put out there, to get more people healthcare coverage. Just like the rest of the bullshit that he told us (GITMO, WARS, DRUG WAR, CIVIL RIGHTS), he has managed to do the opposite as usual and actually reduce the number of Americans with health coverage.

Way to go losers. bongsmilie

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2013pres/11/20131113a.html
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
So we beat a small state that had full employment? That's nice.

Are you happy with the rollout so far?
Click to expand...
about 6.5 million to 300+ million. 48x the population, 123 signups.

123 x 49 = 6027 < 100000

clearly, we can discern from the first month (even the first day!) the success of a program.

thus spake the idiots.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
about 6.5 million to 300+ million. 48x the population, 123 signups.

123 x 49 = 6027 < 100000

clearly, we can discern from the first month (even the first day!) the success of a program.

thus spake the idiots.
Click to expand...
Well you could have just yes, you didn't have to call yourself an idiot.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Well you could have just yes, you didn't have to call yourself an idiot.
Click to expand...
how stupid do you think people look now after mocking enrollments in the first (and thus least urgent) month of enrollment for romneycare, especially now that something like 98-99% of people in that state are insured now?
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
how stupid do you think people look now after mocking enrollments in the first (and thus least urgent) month of enrollment for romneycare, especially now that something like 98-99% of people in that state are insured now?
Click to expand...
People were mocking enrollments because people COULDN'T enroll on our glitchy billion dollar web site. If this is your standard for a successful rollout then you have a career in government ahead of you.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
People were mocking enrollments because people COULDN'T enroll on our glitchy billion dollar web site. If this is your standard for a successful rollout then you have a career in government ahead of you.
Click to expand...
how did you get "successful rollout" out of anything i've said?

if you reading compensation weren't so potato, you'd realize that the point i am making is that it is plainly retarded to judge the success of a program in its forst month, and i gave empirical evidence that demonstrates how stupid you will end up looking if you try to do so.

beennowhere takes it to the next level, he goes by the first day. i'm just glad you're not him intellectually, even though you are the exact same as him politically.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
how did you get "successful rollout" out of anything i've said?

if you reading compensation weren't so potato, you'd realize that the point i am making is that it is plainly retarded to judge the success of a program in its forst month, and i gave empirical evidence that demonstrates how stupid you will end up looking if you try to do so.

beennowhere takes it to the next level, he goes by the first day. i'm just glad you're not him intellectually, even though you are the exact same as him politically.
Click to expand...
So you're saying it was an unsuccessful rollout? It's hard to get a straight answer from you. Are you happy with the results so far, I mean being that they are so much better than Romneycare and all (that you have continually pointed out). How was I supposed to surmise you were unhappy?

Let's try this, 1-5 with 1 being wildly unsuccessful disaster, 3 being about what you expected and 5 being wildly successful where would you put it?
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
123.

seriously dude. don't be so fucking stupid.
Click to expand...
That's about how I would score it too. 1 being wildly unsuccessful, 2 because SOME were able to wade through and 3 for it being about what i expected. Thanks for answering a question truthfully.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
That's about how I would score it too. 1 being wildly unsuccessful, 2 because SOME were able to wade through and 3 for it being about what i expected. Thanks for answering a question truthfully.
Click to expand...
congratulations, you have brought him out of hibernation.



hope you're happy.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Not happy, but mildly amused at you not having enough integrity or balls to admit it's a not a success at this point. You can't even give an opinion other than Romneycare...
It's OK bucky, the only one who would call you a racist for saying it's not going well is you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top