'Fox News Live' Youtube Feed, Real-time Propaganda Trolling

hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
So I had Nancy Pelosi's live feed on from Fox News Live on Youtube and noticed in the corner a live chat box that is so big, anyone actually watching the video will have that constant noise pumped into the brain.

I went back to take a SS of it and the feed was gone.

Here is one from a live stream that I did get:
Screen Shot 2019-12-05 at 12.41.28 PM.png
 
hanimmal said:
So I had Nancy Pelosi's live feed on from Fox News Live on Youtube and noticed in the corner a live chat box that is so big, anyone actually watching the video will have that constant noise pumped into the brain.

I went back to take a SS of it and the feed was gone.

Here is one from a live stream that I did get:
View attachment 4432048
Click to expand...
These chattards have the attention span of a two year old. The feed doesn't even relate to the subject.
 
Fogdog said:
These chattards have the attention span of a two year old. The feed doesn't even relate to the subject.
Click to expand...
That I think is the point, Fox News can play the hearings, while reprogramming what is said in them in real time to the people watching.
 
The Newshour allows chats comments on their live streamed show, but don't allow regular You Tube comments on any of the other videos. If I'm in the mood for comic relief, I might look at fox news, but for real news, I watch nothing but the Newshour.


During the televised hearings, one of the guys on fox and friends was telling everyone not to watch. lol
 
I wanted to see what the chat feeds looked like on the different news stations youtube feeds:
Screen Shot 2019-12-09 at 10.56.50 AM.png
Chat is disabled on CSAPN.
Screen Shot 2019-12-09 at 10.58.50 AM.png

Fox links to every personality and looks like they have decided to make it 'invite-only' mode. But have all their 'top chat' posted. Wonder if the price of admission is a MAGA hat.

Screen Shot 2019-12-09 at 11.00.26 AM.png
NBC's chat was disabled too, Fox has so little credibility.
 
too larry said:
Check out the YT comments on Fox News Sunday. They hate Chris Wallace. It's bad.
Click to expand...
There is no competing with that noise, I stopped scrolling about 5 pages down and did not see one positive comment for Chris Wallace on that YT video.

Youtube commentary is so broken.
 
So I just watch the Comey interview on FISA, it was very good. And I was going to pull the video and post it, but as of right now this is what is uploaded by Fox:
Screen Shot 2019-12-15 at 11.01.28 AM.png

They uploaded a edited version right at the point he says something being taken out of context.


They cut off the first several minutes of the conversation and went with the hit piece they wanted for their narrative.

I love the face that they use as the start screen too btw, they really are just all trolls working to push this guys online propaganda.
 

At about 2:40 (skipping a lot of the good stuff) Comey starts the sentence that they started the First uploaded edited version at. It was a really good interview.
 
The problem of propaganda news sites either of the Fox News or CNN sides wouldn't exist if they were public entities, with newscasters who are appointed, vetted, and approved by the public. But, you'd also need a variety of viewpoints from all political opinions getting equal airtime. The last requirement is they can't be allowed to lie, and if caught doing so, after the third strike are fired.

Until such is in place, that's why I refuse to watch any "news" station. Maybe if they employed people like Richard Wolff I'd listen.
 
Communist Dreamer said:
The problem of propaganda news sites either of the Fox News or CNN sides wouldn't exist if they were public entities, with newscasters who are appointed, vetted, and approved by the public. But, you'd also need a variety of viewpoints from all political opinions getting equal airtime. The last requirement is they can't be allowed to lie, and if caught doing so, after the third strike are fired.

Until such is in place, that's why I refuse to watch any "news" station. Maybe if they employed people like Richard Wolff I'd listen.
Click to expand...
Nah thanks.

I am not a fan of the 'teach both sides' b.s., that is how the evangelicals try to get creationism taught in schools.

Facts are facts, if they have to argue in a court of law that they don't need to adhere to facts, they are no longer news and it should be illegal for them to use the words 'news' on anything that broadcasts them. Aside from people jamming up reporters by lying to them from 'high up in the Whitehouse, or White house sources' do you have some examples of CNN being a propaganda source?

Because that was Trump planting 'news' to own the libs. He has been caught lying to the American public nonstop since taking his oath of office.
 
hanimmal said:
Nah thanks.

I am not a fan of the 'teach both sides' b.s., that is how the evangelicals try to get creationism taught in schools.

Facts are facts, if they have to argue in a court of law that they don't need to adhere to facts, they are no longer news and it should be illegal for them to use the words 'news' on anything that broadcasts them. Aside from people jamming up reporters by lying to them from 'high up in the Whitehouse, or White house sources' do you have some examples of CNN being a propaganda source?

Because that was Trump planting 'news' to own the libs. He has been caught lying to the American public nonstop since taking his oath of office.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with having a panel of a libertarian, republican, moderate, democrat, socialist, and a communist all able to respond and interview based on their viewpoint?

Yes facts are facts, but their interpretation and how they're presented from those various viewpoints makes all the difference.

But I already said no lying is allowed, even if those lies support even yours (Hanimmal's) viewpoint and eliminate them from doing harm.
 
Communist Dreamer said:
What's wrong with having a panel of a libertarian, republican, moderate, democrat, socialist, and a communist all able to respond and interview based on their viewpoint?

Yes facts are facts, but their interpretation and how they're presented from those various viewpoints makes all the difference.
Click to expand...
There is nothing wrong with that, but time being what it is, we can't force news companies to have to have a specific mixture for every panel.

We are in a very opinionated time due to this new communication method we have online. But it doesn't mean that facts need to be spun to report them. Propaganda does not belong on the news.

Media like OANN need to be exposed for being fraudulent propaganda and are in no way shape or form 'news'.
 
hanimmal said:
There is nothing wrong with that, but time being what it is, we can't force news companies to have to have a specific mixture for every panel.

We are in a very opinionated time due to this new communication method we have online. But it doesn't mean that facts need to be spun to report them. Propaganda does not belong on the news.

Media like OANN need to be exposed for being fraudulent propaganda and are in no way shape or form 'news'.
Click to expand...

Propaganda isn't allowed anywhere in my proposal. That exists now, no matter which news companies you choose. Maybe it's time we stop the lie of "freedom of the press" and force them to report actual truthful news.
 
Communist Dreamer said:
What's wrong with having a panel of a libertarian, republican, moderate, democrat, socialist, and a communist all able to respond and interview based on their viewpoint?

Yes facts are facts, but their interpretation and how they're presented from those various viewpoints makes all the difference.

But I already said no lying is allowed, even if those lies support even yours (Hanimmal's) viewpoint and eliminate them from doing harm.
Click to expand...
“let’s put nazis on the news!”

- nazis
 
UncleBuck said:
“We just need to hear all sides! Including the nazis!”

- nazis
Click to expand...

I think you're just talking to yourself, because that's not what I'm saying at all, and everyone else reading what I say who has at leas two functional braincells will also come to the same conclusion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

hanimmal
January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.
318 319 320
Replies
6K
Views
284K
Grandpapy
Grandpapy
D
First ever grow ever and using Ebb n flow oxygen cube reciruclating system
4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
7K
Hollatchaboy
Hollatchaboy
hanimmal
Biden-Trump Debate Prep.
4 5 6
Replies
105
Views
5K
hanimmal
hanimmal
Padawanbater2
Steve Bannon | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)
Replies
3
Views
301
Sir Napsalot
Sir Napsalot
T
My first dealing with the infamous white powdery mildew
2 3 4
Replies
72
Views
7K
pinner420
pinner420
Back
Top