Ex-police chief Bill Blair to handle Liberals' pot legalization file

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
As the Liberal government gets to work on its campaign pledge to legalize marijuana, the former police chief of Toronto will be taking a lead role.

Last month, Bill Blair was named as one of two parliamentary secretaries to the minister of justice. Sources tell CBC News he's been assigned to handle the pot file.

Blair's new role fits with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's attempts to frame the issue during the election campaign.

The Conservatives tried to use Trudeau's legalization stance to paint him as a lightweight or even dangerous, with last-minute ads in Punjabi and Chinese newspapers suggesting Trudeau supported selling marijuana to children.

In contrast, Trudeau pitched marijuana legalization as a way of protecting children and stopping criminals.

"What is very clear right now is that Mr. Harper's current approach is making marijuana too easy to access for our kids and at the same time funding street crime, organized gangs and gun runners," Trudeau said at a campaign stop in Quebec City in September.

When he was police chief, Blair seemed to support at least one call to legalize the drug. In October 2014, the Centre for Addictions and Mental Health (CAMH) came out in favour of legalization of marijuana, combined with strict regulation.

At the time, Blair told reporters that it wasn't up to police to make the law, but he was "very encouraged by the public health approach advocated by CAMH."

It seems that now he will get the chance to help make the new marijuana laws. There are many outstanding questions about how the Liberal plan would work, including where pot would be sold, how it would be taxed and what happens to the profits.

In their election platform, the Liberals said they would work with the provinces and territories, as well as public health officials, to design a system.



Blair may find himself at odds with some of his former colleagues. The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has advocated ticketing marijuana users but not full legalization
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
That's still very low on detail, and sounds like a stall tactic.
Once again, we see the sperm of Pierre had no real fuel for the fire going into this.
I wonder if he's going to forget his other promises like easing the burden of student debt.
But they aren't even in the HoC, yet, so I guess one can't expect much until they are genuinely "back at work."
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
Shit you're up early, I figured I'd post this and here it is! Does anyone know this guys views on cannabis as a police officer? Toronto, so probably hard on drugs big time. Does not sound reassuring AT ALL. Whats the logic behind hiring someone who used to arrest us to now make the rules for us? Extremely hard not to form a bias when all he's been trained on about cannabis throughout his career is treat cannabis negatively as an officer.(
large % do)So much for home grows, looks like he's passing the buck and therefore any of the blame, to this guy if things don't pan out the way people want. We've all seen the lack of education police have on Cannabis(fire, mold, "organized crime".) Now THIS is who will decide the rules?

Almost positive that former police officers didn't bring the framework for WA, CO, Washington, DC, Alaska, to the table. Let alone create it all together from start to finish. I can only imagine who Mr. Blair may consult on the creation of our framework. How many members of the Cannabis community will get to have a say in this creation? Will anyone OTHER than the scummy self profiteers in our industry who rolled over for the $$ of the MMPR be advised? Because based on credentials alone this man does not have our best interests in mind. Personally I'm insulted by the choice JT has made.
 
Last edited:

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
This is just me speculating but I can see them leaving out home grows to avoid any complications and red tape to make everyone in government happy. All this talk of sales through government storefronts. That just says LP's to me. Phelan needs to hurry up and understand that sick people are suffering and some even dying while we wait for his decision. Illness can not be put on hold. So WTF is the hold up?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Shit you're up early, I figured I'd post this and here it is! Does anyone know this guys views on cannabis as a police officer? Toronto, so probably hard on drugs big time. Does not sound reassuring AT ALL. Whats the logic behind hiring someone who used to arrest us to now make the rules for us? Extremely hard not to form a bias when all he's been trained on about cannabis throughout his career is treat cannabis negatively as an officer.(
large % do)So much for home grows, looks like he's passing the buck and therefore any of the blame, to this guy if things don't pan out the way people want. We've all seen the lack of education police have on Cannabis(fire, mold, "organized crime".) Now THIS is who will decide the rules?

Almost positive that former police officers didn't bring the framework for WA, CO, Washington, DC, Alaska, to the table. Let alone create it all together from start to finish. I can only imagine who Mr. Blair may consult on the creation of our framework. How many members of the Cannabis community will get to have a say in this creation? Will anyone OTHER than the scummy self profiteers in our industry who rolled over for the $$ of the MMPR be advised? Because based on credentials alone this man does not have our best interests in mind. Personally I'm insulted by the choice JT has made.
Re. Cops driving legalization in Colorado; my own county's sheriff is a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the state for legalizing weed even while it's still federally illegal. Stupid fuck needs to read the constitution!
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
Of course there will be lp's. Who else will bring product to market?

I think the whole home grow thing is being blown way out of proportion. The sky is not falling because an ex cop was put on the file. I'm also positive that police from each respective place that has legalized, were in fact at the table during talks.

They want to regulate like alcohol, that to me says you will be able to grow at home, just like you can produce your own wine or beer.
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
THIS IS NOT ALCOHOL!!!!!!!
Hrm, no kidding.
However the word on the street has been clear, they want to regulate it like alcohol.

So, what does that mean to you? The framework is in place for alcohol, I believe we all agree alcohol is worse than mj, and still you can produce your own alcohol.

I'd love to hear a rational argument that at least supports or proves the chicken little bs. The sky is not falling!!!


****Edit

A good read to support my position. Blair won't create the laws.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/bill-blair-trudeaus-man-on-marijuana/article28072196/?cmpid=rss1
 
Last edited:

gb123

Well-Known Member
So kids take their parents booze every day if they so wish...
I guess parents will end up in jail if that happens with pot? :lol:.
One will kill a child the other wont. One they will TRY and incarcerate you for. Just watch and see!!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
THIS IS NOT ALCOHOL!!!!!!!
No, but there are enough similarities that it makes sense to legislate the two with a similar approach. That's how full recreational legal weed got passed here in Colorado, it works because there's a separate track for medical.
 

nsbudca

Well-Known Member
I never said the sky was falling....it shouldn't be treated like alcohol because it is nothing like alcohol...I do not want to go into a liquor store to buy my meds...just saying it sounds oxymoronic ffs....
No bud you could grow some, legally once and for all. Without worrying about losing your pinks.
 
Top