did you hear the news today?

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
LOL!

"may have"

"i would assume"

yep, nailed it! too bad interrogators say that enhanced interrogation leads to false information. you want information? get on their side. promise them stuff. etc etc etc.

funny to see someone like you defend torture if it works against obama. partisan much?

LOL!
I never mentioned 'torture.'

And I sourced the motherfucking Washington Post.

Jesus, Buck.
 

RainbowBrite86

Well-Known Member
I would just like marijuana legalized. I don't care which politician puts that into action. I'd just like to see it happen.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
The truly amazing thing about these numbers is the opposition and obstruction he's had to deal with since day one. Can you imagine what he can do with a majority in House and Senate?
What is truly amazing is that you fail to recognize that Democrats held majorities in Congress from January 2007 until January 2011.

Democrats had full control of the Legislative and Executive branches from January 2009 until January 2011.

And then maintained a majority in the Senate after that.
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
What is truly amazing is that you fail to recognize that Democrats held majorities in Congress from January 2007 until January 2011.

Democrats had full control of the Legislative and Executive branches from January 2009 until January 2011.

And then maintained a majority in the Senate after that.


Failed to recognize what, again?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What is truly amazing is that you fail to recognize that Democrats held majorities in Congress from January 2007 until January 2011.

Democrats had full control of the Legislative and Executive branches from January 2009 until January 2011.

And then maintained a majority in the Senate after that.
there goes johnny, telling half the story like usual.

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I never mentioned 'torture.'

And I sourced the motherfucking Washington Post.

Jesus, Buck.
enhanced interrogation is the euphemism for torture, we need not play dumb here.

and the washington post said "may have" and "i would assume".

i need something a little better than your assumptions that enhanced interrogation produced more than a series of false leads.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
enhanced interrogation is the euphemism for torture, we need not play dumb here.

and the washington post said "may have" and "i would assume".

i need something a little better than your assumptions that enhanced interrogation produced more than a series of false leads.
You mean the false leads that led to the actual dispatch of OBL?

LOL!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you claim now that the Democrats did not control Congress during that period?

lol.
when did i claim that?

all i ever did was point out the record obstructionism of the GOP. hell, they even took to voting against their own proposals.

snark!
 

RainbowBrite86

Well-Known Member
when did i claim that?

all i ever did was point out the record obstructionism of the GOP. hell, they even took to voting against their own proposals.

snark!
Isn't that what Pinky always says at the end of his sentences when he's talking to Brain? Now I have to watch Animaniacs. See what you've done?
 

RainbowBrite86

Well-Known Member
i'm all up in that head of yours. let me get my head all up in you now.
Lol. Ohh Bucky. Chanice has got you covered. I'm a freak. Not a slut. And there is a difference :) Just because i'm open about sexual issues and scenarios etc., doesn't mean i'm open to screwing anyone who asks. I have a strict no RIU members rule in effect anyway. I also have my strict "no strange" rule. And then there's that no married men one I told you about. It just wouldn't work out between us, love. (Yes. That was a Captain Jack reference lol).
 
Top