Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Uncledivider isn't going to merge his own thread, just the ones that annoy him. He's a good liberal: it's not about having a free debate, it's about controlling the discussion.
If he wanted to control it he would simply start deleting and editing posts.

Remember, there is no freedom of speech on a private forum on the internet. I wasted alot of blood pressure until I realized that. Life isnt fair.
 

deprave

New Member
If he wanted to control it he would simply start deleting and editing posts.

Remember, there is no freedom of speech on a private forum on the internet. I wasted alot of blood pressure until I realized that. Life isnt fair.
I feel really bad for you that you didn't learned this till you were an adult.
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
Only when there is substantial breaking news about the elections do I write a thread at pivotal junctures. It is election season and this is the politics forums. I write here about a lot more than Ron Paul its just my threads about Ron Paul combined with others does sort of make a big jumble of Ron Paul threads combined with the fact that they get the most responses from lovers and haters of Ron Paul alike it keeps them on the front page.
no you don't. the majority of your ron paul threads open with a pro-paul campaign video and some delusion on how he's killing it in the primaries....
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ummm, hate to break it to you guys, but i am not a mod anymore. just a regular member.

if a mod feels that this thread needs to be merged, go ahead.

all your whining and pouting is music to my ears, though.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
no you don't. the majority of your ron paul threads open with a pro-paul campaign video and some delusion on how he's killing it in the primaries....
you didn't hear? ron paul IS killing it in the primaries. here's the strategy:

1) finish dead last in more contests than everyone else
2) never win a contest
3) rank dead last in national polls
4) ???
5) PROFIT!
 

Killuminati82

Active Member
Wow unclebuck how brainwashed are you? i take it you are enjoying the nwo puppet with there fluoride water, GMOs, and the better for you then sugar sweetners ie aspartame yumyum
 

mccumcumber

Well-Known Member
What makes you so confident that Paul will get a majority of the delegates? Any evidence of this? Not trying to flame... Just wondering.

Edit: fixed error.
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
i know, what a fucking cult.
Ron Paul has a chance of winning, ignoring that fact and concluding that him winning is an absolute impossibility is cult mentality. He is less than 200 votes behind Romney$$ at 83% reporting for the populous vote shows that he has a chance. He isn't guaranteed to win the nomination, obviously that is not what we are saying. But you people rule it out as if it is an impossibility, ignoring the fact that he has a chance is arrogant and shows that you don't understand the nomination process.
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
because it isn't following the format of the other paul threads... -paul is so awesome -all of you should love ron paul because he is awesome -paul campaign video -paul 2012 -paul is doing great, the media is trying to cover it up -paul is being censored, everywhere... blah blah blah...
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
in the interests of fairness i merged another "Ron Paul loses" thread uncle buck started on Feb 2 with this one.

everybody happy?
 

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
because it isn't following the format of the other paul threads... -paul is so awesome -all of you should love ron paul because he is awesome -paul campaign video -paul 2012 -paul is doing great, the media is trying to cover it up -paul is being censored, everywhere... blah blah blah...
Actually it was a thread explaining how the process works, unlike this thread which is just another hit piece on ron paul.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ron Paul has a chance of winning, ignoring that fact and concluding that him winning is an absolute impossibility is cult mentality. He is less than 200 votes behind Romney$$ at 83% reporting for the populous vote shows that he has a chance. He isn't guaranteed to win the nomination, obviously that is not what we are saying. But you people rule it out as if it is an impossibility, ignoring the fact that he has a chance is arrogant and shows that you don't understand the nomination process.
intrade gives him a 2% chance, and i think that is incredibly generous.

maybe if he racks up a few more last place finishes in arizona and michigan (he will), than he'll be winning. maybe.

lol, what a loser ron paul is.
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
I am not vegan. I am one of the millions of ignorrant animal eaters that are completely oblivious that an animal must suffer and slowly die while hanging upside down on a hook and leaking it's guts out before it turns into a yummy red steak or a cute hamburger
They use a spike gun that blasts a metal ram through their skull, killing them instantly. Even better than bleeding them out.

It beats 99.9% of the other ways an animal could be killed for slaughtering purposes. What do you suggest, we wait for it to die of old age then butcher it? Unless you got a better idea........
 
Top