Conroy getting paid...

G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
Did you know it is illegal for a lawyer to receive more than $7500 cash before mandatory reporting to the Law Society. We have at least 3 videos of CONroy receiving between 8-$14,000 at a time, on video captured for all to see. Wonder if it all made it into the trust account, since NO ONE has ever seen the books??, and the treasurer Sandra Colasanti bailed along with 2 other steering committee members when Canada Revenue agency started their investigation. So a total of 1.3 million was given to CONroy, none of which he gave back, I contributed $2200.

Also this case was put together by the founders of the Coalition of which I am one, in fact the former Executive Director and I never once as Jason's second hand man ever saw any ledger or true accounting of where the funds came from and where they went, Hmmm....

Also this whole case was started and funded by patients for patients, (many on disability pensions), not lawyers, don't ever forget that!! Also CONroy still has his pledge to get you to give up your Winnings on the class action privacy breach I started with Branch McMaster, by way of a pledge still up sucking people in to give up their monies !

Oh and there is the little matter of CONROY trying to get Branch McMaster to take him on board for a mere 5% of the taking estimated at 800 million, so his portion could potentially been 40 million, hmmm....The partners of BM, said " thanks but no thanks ". Now that's where the Cadillac job description came from, Conroy's own words, to me.

Ps. The average dosage across Canada according to Richot testimony and fact sheets is actually 18.22 grams, not 1-3. Plus factor in derivatives won in Smith and there is no reason why you cannot get a 50 gram license, with those facts. Cheers....
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
willieboy said:
Look who crawled out from under the rock. More insanity to come ?
Click to expand...
At least she deals in FACTS, not rhetoric. You would not believe the goods Nadine has on Wilcox and Conroy operating as business partners, not as a coalition saving our rights to access. Time will probably see Conroy taking early retirement.

If you want to see a case that overturned Conroy's nonsense, see Kirks Garber case, which overturned Manson ruling on 150 gram carry limit. Something the GREAT ONE a could not see himself capable of.
 
cannadan

cannadan

Well-Known Member
I remember Nadine..she was here for quite a while....
Welcome to the forum Gatorgold and thanks for the updates....on the wilcox and Conroy things....
I was wondering how Nadine was making out....she seemed to be a very determined person....
and a hard worker from the sound of it. She seemed to know a lot of the backroom details ....from what was going on.......
in the coalition.
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
cannadan said:
I remember Nadine..she was here for quite a while....
Welcome to the forum Gatorgold and thanks for the updates....on the wilcox and Conroy things....
I was wondering how Nadine was making out....she seemed to be a very determined person....
and a hard worker from the sound of it. She seemed to know a lot of the backroom details ....from what was going on.......
in the coalition.
Click to expand...
Yes Nadine and a few of us have pieced it all together and it is not a pretty sight. That is unless you love corruption and deception. Just remember it was us patients who paid for the case, that was mismanaged from the beginning. Here is a tidbit, Conroy started this Allard case as a class action, my lawyer Kate Saunders at Branch McMaster told
Conroy you are doing it all wrong, it should be a constitutional challenge against access rights. Conroy called Professor Alan Young, who verified that it needed to be a constitutional challenge NOT a class action, so Conroy did a press release with a lame excuse, why they were switching from Class action to Constiuional challenge. That one incompetent fiasco cost us patients a minimum of $10,000 to fix that mistake,never mind the delay in time to restart the whole thing and on and on it goes.

CHeers....
 
Ahemait

Ahemait

Well-Known Member
Wait, weren't you guys all over this guys jock up until this week? Wasn't he like your hero?
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Gatorgold said:
Yes Nadine and a few of us have pieced it all together and it is not a pretty sight. That is unless you love corruption and deception. Just remember it was us patients who paid for the case, that was mismanaged from the beginning. Here is a tidbit, Conroy started this Allard case as a class action, my lawyer Kate Saunders at Branch McMaster told
Conroy you are doing it all wrong, it should be a constitutional challenge against access rights. Conroy called Professor Alan Young, who verified that it needed to be a constitutional challenge NOT a class action, so Conroy did a press release with a lame excuse, why they were switching from Class action to Constiuional challenge. That one incompetent fiasco cost us patients a minimum of $10,000 to fix that mistake,never mind the delay in time to restart the whole thing and on and on it goes.

CHeers....
Click to expand...
And what plans have you on this subject? Will action be taken ?
 
J

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
The Hippy said:
And what plans have you on this subject? Will action be taken ?
Click to expand...
I'm not 100% up on barrister/solicitor liability but if negligence could be proven there might be a case, but it's probably not worth the court fees over 10K. If the allegations are true it's likely up to the CRA.

Also the costs are being returned directly to the Plaintiff(s) it seems, so that's probably Neil Allard.
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
JungleStrikeGuy said:
I'm not 100% up on barrister/solicitor liability but
The Hippy said:
And what plans have you on this subject? Will action be taken ?
Click to expand...
What actions will be taken. Well I cannot speak for Nadine, but let's just put it this way, she is a pit bull and forensic accountant that has a passion for uprooting corruption and deception and has the intelligence and the support of some very important people, but more importantly than that she has over 400 pieces of evidence and facts. One can only presume she will play her cards skillfully. As it is apparent that Conroy has made many wrong moves, including adding in Jason's testimony in a last ditch effort to save the leftouts, but the courts rejected Wilcoxs testimony as not credible. Just like Len Garis fire chief and RCMP Shane Holmquist, who is still on stress leave after the Allard trial.

Why do we all not band together and ask for full financial disclosure from Conroy and the Coalition, as they have NEVER shown a true accounting despite being officially asked for. Time for some legal action, but each of you should send an email to conroy and the BC law society for full disclosure!! We can all pressure them into it or let CRA deal with it and the law society! But demand transparency, this has nothing to do with lawyer bashing, it's about corruption, theft, misrepresentation and a whole lot more. As fir me as former co founder and executive director of said Coalition, I know and saw what they did, too bad for them.
Cheers......:
Click to expand...
 
J

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
Nothing wrong with demanding transparency, but if you/Nadine have evidence, you should commence the proper legal proceedings. Conroy et al are under no obligation to open their books to random people on the internet (or even to those who donated).
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
Jungle strike,

Actually you are wrong. A lawyers trust account and the acccounts of a supposed non profit Coalition are supposed to be freely available to those involved with the case or org. In fact non profits are supposed to post regular annual financial statements, as per law. Which Wilcox has never done, so he is in violation of another law. Besides we are not random people on the internet, we are the plaintiffs, who were represented by Allard et al, and donors who financed the whole thing. After all it was OUR monies that made "their" world go round, like Rockstars on a world tour. Why are you sticking up for the lawyers?? Why not stick up for the patients?

Cheers,
 
J

JungleStrikeGuy

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
those guys should be held accountable.
Click to expand...
Which is why things should be done through official channels and proceedings. As I said there's nothing wrong with demanding transparency, but if there is actual evidence, let alone 400 pieces of it I'm just not sure why this isn't being actively handled through the courts / other official proceedings.
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
Doing Dishes, is right, since you were not in the trench so to speak, you have no idea what you are talking about. Except for the fact that you are exceptional at, being self centered and greedy, what else do you offer your so called canna friends, besides cheap backdoor weed??
 
G

Gatorgold

Well-Known Member
TOronto meds, you are greatly mistaken. CONRoy did not get our licenses to grow back, it was us the volunteers who got it back because CONroy would not even take the case because he thought we would never be able to raise the funds to do so. So CONroy demanded a $10,000 retainer to start the action, which he screwed up from the get go.

So get your facts straight. Also it was Justice Phelan who wrote the decision all CONroy did was put a convuluted, case that any third year law student could of put together. He is no Rockstar, and has only a 50/50 win ratio on drug cases, too.
 
torontomeds

torontomeds

Well-Known Member
Gatorgold said:
I agree wholheardly with Doing Dishes !
Click to expand...
Of course you do.. He is your cheerleader......
Why did you hire Conroy? to not protect you're garden? because in case you did not get the memo, you can grow again. So go and grow. You guys keep accusing me of backdooring, but you guys are the ones crying about carry limits. seems you want to transport a lot of Cannabis. Like I keep saying bad job what? what was the bad job? was the end goal not to allow us to grow? So go and grow you cry babies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top