Anyone have information about the geoengineering over california?

N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Next time you see a grid pattern? Its just the same plane lost out there that the Tower is making do that pattern so that other aircraft will fly into it. The ATC does that stuff for fun.

Seriously though, the crisscross patterns? Just watch them being made with a telescope or good binoculars, its just one or 2 planes doing it. Working in tandem, going nowhere.

If you think it is normal for aircraft to fly east and then turn and fly west, then turn and fly east for hours and hours, it isn't. Most flight plans require a destination and you pretty much get to go directly there without alot of screwing around. Tower might let you play the crisscross game for 5 minutes, but not for 1 hour and certainly not in heavily congested airspace like S Cal.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
Buck,
Haven't you heard about the Retarded Potential ?
Click to expand...
there was a time when i could use english words to describe that mathematical expression.

now i just drool while trying.

the V of R with respect to t is equal to the one over four times pi to the (weird) E times the integral from v to the t towards (unexpressed) of (that big nasty thing in the integral) differentiated with respect to v primed.

now i feel retarded. thanks.
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
there was a time when i could use english words to describe that mathematical expression.

now i just drool while trying.

the V of R with respect to t is equal to the one over four times pi to the (weird) E times the integral from v to the t towards (unexpressed) of (that big nasty thing in the integral) differentiated with respect to v primed.

now i feel retarded. thanks.
Click to expand...
:lol:
I was sort of implying something else,


I think all this digging into the late-1800s Physics papers is rotting my mind. I can't even communicate a joke clearly.
But I am starting to see light at the end of the tunnel; it has to do with Langley's Bolometer, and his measurements of the temperature of the moon. That guy--inadvertently--may be the reason we have the focus on CO2 instead of other "gases", as it were, via Arrhenius.

There is still much to this story, going into the 1950s, however. It is fascinating to see how these people did their experiments from the original papers. It all seems so crude relative to this age of silicon everything.
 
Jussblaz3420

Jussblaz3420

Well-Known Member
Chemtrails, weather manipulation, eugenics, its all true and youre ignorant if u dont believe so, google pics of contrails, then take a look up in the sky and see if those long lines of dispersing chemicals resemble a contrail. I have plenty of pics i could post of chemtrails, i live in new york and i see them almost every day.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Jussblaz3420 said:
Chemtrails, weather manipulation, eugenics, its all true and youre ignorant if u dont believe so, google pics of contrails, then take a look up in the sky and see if those long lines of dispersing chemicals resemble a contrail. I have plenty of pics i could post of chemtrails, i live in new york and i see them almost every day.
Click to expand...
Lol@ "Chemtrails"

Its called a vapour trail, you Fucking dumbasses.
 
Jussblaz3420

Jussblaz3420

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Lol@ "Chemtrails"

Its called a vapour trail, you Fucking dumbasses.
Click to expand...
Lol dont be so quick buddy, the vapor trail from a plane is actually called a contrail, atleast where im from, and why so hostile? Its not our fault u were born wit a tiny shmeckle.
 
DonAlejandroVega

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
Jussblaz3420 said:
Chemtrails, weather manipulation, eugenics, its all true and youre ignorant if u dont believe so, google pics of contrails, then take a look up in the sky and see if those long lines of dispersing chemicals resemble a contrail. I have plenty of pics i could post of chemtrails, i live in new york and i see them almost every day.
Click to expand...
I'm sure. and in space, under the seas........all sorts of shenanigans. but, the Hydra's heart is here, on land, in Washington, DC. why run around trying to lop off its many heads, only to have them re-grow.

end the state..............
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Jussblaz3420 said:
Chemtrails, weather manipulation, eugenics, its all true and youre ignorant if u dont believe so, google pics of contrails, then take a look up in the sky and see if those long lines of dispersing chemicals resemble a contrail. I have plenty of pics i could post of chemtrails, i live in new york and i see them almost every day.
Click to expand...
 
D

Dr.StealthGrow

Member
Richard Simmons said:
I am just wondering if anyone has some scientific website or something I can go to learn about whats going on in the air.

I see these planes flying over and doing criss cross patterns over me and then they like poof out over the course of an hour or so and its lookin real freaky where im at right now.

(ps this isn't a sock puppet thread like most others, this is a serious want to know whats going on so I can be aware and not dumbass)
Click to expand...
They talk as if its a proposal, but it has been going on for decades, (Operation Popeye).

David Keith is one of the scientist behind geoengineering. Admitted in a conference that spraying alumina (along with other elements) into the atmosphere, that it will "reflect" the suns rays.
Not to mention Monsanto is working on (or has) an aluminum resistant gene.

Dane Wigington worked with solar energy. Noticed a difference in solar uptake on his solar panels.
Tons of information with citations on his website http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

There is tons of information on this subject, you just have to know where to look and not believe everything you read. There is reports written for the Air Force on controlling the weather by 2025.
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Whistleblowers are starting to come forward. I mean, they talk about the drought in CA, but there is 1,000 gallons wasted everyday in Monterey County and CalAm hasnt been able to find the leak in over 2 months, c'mon now seriously?. Drilling also wastes a lot of water.
Some wildfire are normal but there has been close to 3,000 wild fires this year. Not to mention breaking heat records, in spring.

You mention aerosol trails, that is a global event. "What In The World Are They Spraying?" is a good documentary and talks about how sometimes they spray on the coast then it comes inland.
I have seen planes coming from the west leaving a trail, I look it up on the flight radar and it is no where to be found. Ever since I became aware I have been witnessing plenty events that further conclude that geoengineering is not a proposal and has been going on for decades.
" WeatherWar101 " is a you tube channel that shows nothing but radar images showing how NexRad Satellites play a role in geoengineering.
There is even a video of a lady calling the EPA and the employee admits to being aware and refers to the documentary "What In The World Are They Spraying?. Saying EPA cant do anything about it.
TONS of information on this subject, TONS of patents regarding geoengineering.

The link below show a real radar image with aerosol trails far out from the coast.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/engineered-drought-catastrophe-target-california/


Im a Horticulture major and I will be finishing up this fall. Excited that Im going to be able to use their equipment to perform some test around my area.
Sometimes I wonder how people believe actual theories that have never been proven, yet something that is happening in the now, and indeed is fact, they do not believe.
 
Last edited:
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Dr.StealthGrow said:
They talk as if its a proposal, but it has been going on for decades, (Operation Popeye).

David Keith is one of the scientist behind geoengineering. Admitted in a conference that spraying alumina (along with other elements) into the atmosphere, that it will "reflect" the suns rays.
Not to mention Monsanto is working on (or has) an aluminum resistant gene.

Dane Wigington worked with solar energy. Noticed a difference in solar uptake on his solar panels.
Tons of information with citations on his website http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

There is tons of information on this subject, you just have to know where to look and not believe everything you read. There is reports written for the Air Force on controlling the weather by 2025.
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

Whistleblowers are starting to come forward. I mean, they talk about the drought in CA, but there is 1,000 gallons wasted everyday in Monterey County and CalAm hasnt been able to find the leak in over 2 months, c'mon now seriously?. Drilling also wastes a lot of water.
Some wildfire are normal but there has been close to 3,000 wild fires this year. Not to mention breaking heat records, in spring.

You mention aerosol trails, that is a global event. "What In The World Are They Spraying?" is a good documentary and talks about how sometimes they spray on the coast then it comes inland.
I have seen planes coming from the west leaving a trail, I look it up on the flight radar and it is no where to be found. Ever since I became aware I have been witnessing plenty events that further conclude that geoengineering is not a proposal and has been going on for decades.
" WeatherWar101 " is a you tube channel that shows nothing but radar images showing how NexRad Satellites play a role in geoengineering.
There is even a video of a lady calling the EPA and the employee admits to being aware and refers to the documentary "What In The World Are They Spraying?. Saying EPA cant do anything about it.
TONS of information on this subject, TONS of patents regarding geoengineering.

The link below show a real radar image with aerosol trails far out from the coast.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/engineered-drought-catastrophe-target-california/


Im a Horticulture major and I will be finishing up this fall. Excited that Im going to be able to use their equipment to perform some test around my area.
Sometimes I wonder how people believe actual theories that have never been proven, yet something that is happening in the now, and indeed is fact, they do not believe.
Click to expand...
Batshit fucking crazy...

Go shoot yourself in the head before you try eat anymore brains.
 
AlecTheGardener

AlecTheGardener

Well-Known Member
A horticulture major?

Then you should know that 80-85% of all water consumed in California is used for agriculture. Comparatively metropolitan areas only use about 10% of the total supply.

1,000 gallons of water to a municipality is less then a blink of an eye, now compare that to a plot that needs irrigation, waaaay less then a blink of an eye.

Why are you worried about such a paltry amount of water? If the complaint lies against the municipality for not finding the leak I agree with that sentiment, as long as the leak causes no damage to public or private property 1,000 gallons is nothing on a grand scale.

It is a drought year, like all drought years fires occur. Clearing the forest floors of plant and animal litter is a necessary part of the forest life cycle, fires are exceptional for this purpose.

The CDF has actually been setting more fires in the past few decades on PURPOSE to reduce possibilities of more serious and harmful fires. The increase of fires CDF is starting is helping the forests regrow and flourish in many areas. The reduction of combustible fuels from the forest floor reduces the chance of ignition from all sources. Unfortunately one can only prepare so much for a drought.

Fires are awesome for nature in many ways, humans are the ones who suffer for it most. We love our houses, deer just run off and find another comfortable living area.

The air force and weather experimentation? I suspect few countries have NOT experimented with trying to alter weather patterns.

I have extreme doubt that anything you suggest is happening for reasons other then circumstance and simple chance.

I see no correlations.
 
D

Dr.StealthGrow

Member
AlecTheGardener said:
A horticulture major?

Then you should know that 80-85% of all water consumed in California is used for agriculture. Comparatively metropolitan areas only use about 10% of the total supply.

1,000 gallons of water to a municipality is less then a blink of an eye, now compare that to a plot that needs irrigation, waaaay less then a blink of an eye.

Why are you worried about such a paltry amount of water? If the complaint lies against the municipality for not finding the leak I agree with that sentiment, as long as the leak causes no damage to public or private property 1,000 gallons is nothing on a grand scale.

It is a drought year, like all drought years fires occur. Clearing the forest floors of plant and animal litter is a necessary part of the forest life cycle, fires are exceptional for this purpose.

The CDF has actually been setting more fires in the past few decades on PURPOSE to reduce possibilities of more serious and harmful fires. The increase of fires CDF is starting is helping the forests regrow and flourish in many areas. The reduction of combustible fuels from the forest floor reduces the chance of ignition from all sources. Unfortunately one can only prepare so much for a drought.

Fires are awesome for nature in many ways, humans are the ones who suffer for it most. We love our houses, deer just run off and find another comfortable living area.

The air force and weather experimentation? I suspect few countries have NOT experimented with trying to alter weather patterns.

I have extreme doubt that anything you suggest is happening for reasons other then circumstance and simple chance.

I see no correlations.
Click to expand...

1,000 gallons a day, has been over 3 months....

Do not take offense, as I quite didn't understand where you stand with the wasting water issue. So as long as the rate at which we waste water does not surpass the rate at which we use water for ag. it is ok with you?
Sorry if that is too much of an exaggeration.

Also, I said I understand the cycle, then you go off talking about the same thing in two paragraphs. You are doubting what "I" said, I am simply presenting the information provided by the govt. it self which most are public files. I know how to look for legitimate sources spent my last 2 years in high school learning college level English, then took 3 semesters of English in college. Not saying I am better than any of you.

I can provide you with all the articles and information with sources, but you don't even look at em what is the point of this argument?

Then we got other people saying:
"Batshit fucking crazy...
Go shoot yourself in the head before you try eat anymore brains."

LoL seriously? That explains why we are at this point.



The Privatization of Water: Nestlé Denies that Water is a Fundamental Human Right
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-privatisation-of-water-nestle-denies-that-water-is-a-fundamental-human-right/5332238
 
D

Dr.StealthGrow

Member
Feel free to browse the whole report as I only made some highlights regarding "chemtrails" scientifically referred to as: aerosol injection, aerosol trails or Solar Radiation Management. Again, aerosol injection is only one method to geoengineering, and if you have any critical thinking skills it is very apparent what is occurring. Once again, this is "their side of the story" thus being "toned down" and it is clear they are uncertain of anything regarding geoengineering, only the risks they state, which are definitely occurring.


http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

"Aerosol injection is the dispersal of aerosols, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) or sulfur dioxide(SO2), into the stratosphere to direct solar radiation back toward space or absorb heat, thuscooling the Earth. Military aircraft, artillery shells, or stratospheric balloons could be employed to inject the aerosols. The annual cost for sulfur particle injection using airplanes is calculated to be several billion dollars, depending on the amount, location, and type of sulfur particle injected into the stratosphere. However, there has not been any testing to determine whether the theoretical predictions will match reality.Aerosol injection seeks to imitate large volcanic eruptions. Indeed, many studies have based aerosol injection simulations on data gathered and analyzed from the Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption in the Philippines in 1991, which led to a reduction in global temperatures, though not distributed evenly across regions.
Sulfur releases from volcanic eruptions are random, with cooling impacts that have lasted no more than a few years. Aerosol injection would probably have to occur several times over decades or centuries to offset radiative forcing caused by greenhouse
gases due to the short effectiveness time frame of aerosol injection.
The benefits and risks of aerosol injection would not be evenly distributed around the globe. Apotential benefit, in addition to cooling of the planet, could be reduced or reversed sea and land ice melting (as long as the aerosols don’t settle on and darken snow and ice).
Some risks couldbe drought in Africa and Asia leading to a loss in agricultural productivity, the GHG impact that would accumulate from transporting the aerosol to the site of injection, stratospheric ozone depletion, weakening of sunlight for solar power,
a less blue sky, and obstruction of Earth-based optical astronomy."


"•Changes in regional and seasonal climates. SRM techniques may alter
precipitation patterns, which could have consequences for ecosystems and
affected societies.
•Ozone depletion. Under certain circumstances, use of SRM techniques such as
sulfate aerosol injection may lead to ozone depletion which would allow harmful
UVB rays to reach the Earth.
•Preservation of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. SRM techniques applied in the
stratosphere or space lessen the amount of ultraviolet radiation striking the
Earth’s atmosphere, which is likely to extend the atmospheric lifetime of non-CO2
greenhouse gases that are more potent than CO2.
•Diversion from more permanent solutions. If societies conclude that SRM
techniques can provide quick relief, they may invest less in developing and
deploying more permanent GHG emission reduction solutions.
•“Unknown unknowns.” The history of the Earth’s climate demonstrates that
small changes may result in abrupt changes, raising concerns about unknown
effects of large-scale geoengineering."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top