Anti government in the politics section

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Now show the ones that "switched sides" besides Strom Thurmond.
the south voted for democrats every single time, without fail, from the end of reconstruction to the passing of the civil rights bill.

then they voted for republican barry goldwater. then they voted for racial segregationist george wallace. then they voted for nixon, and reagan, and bush 1, and dole, and bush 2, and mccain, and romney, and trump, all republicans.

and your claim is that there was not a switch in electoral politics in the south after civil rights was passed?

you are dumber than a sack of shit.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
the south voted for democrats every single time, without fail, from the end of reconstruction to the passing of the civil rights bill.

then they voted for republican barry goldwater. then they voted for racial segregationist george wallace. then they voted for nixon, and reagan, and bush 1, and dole, and bush 2, and mccain, and romney, and trump, all republicans.

and your claim is that there was not a switch in electoral politics in the south after civil rights was passed?

you are dumber than a sack of shit.
You claim that there's racial elements there......identify them in this post or just continue to make unsubstantiated claims, like claiming you would ditch your account if Trump won lol.

I am assuming this is the white vote you are describing here, but since you wont label it as you claim it is racial, you just have an unproven theory that your side magically switched.
 

HAF2

Well-Known Member
You claim that there's racial elements there......identify them in this post or just continue to make unsubstantiated claims, like claiming you would ditch your account if Trump won lol.

I am assuming this is the white vote you are describing here, but since you wont label it as you claim it is racial, you just have an unproven theory that your side magically switched.
Unrelated question for you.

Do you think trump is a racist?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I have seen evidence of sexism, but seen nothing racist.
so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?

maybe we just have different definitions of what is racist.

for example, i have the correct definition of what is racist, and you are a deluded, uneducated, civil rights hating, racial segregation encouraging, neo-confederate, who hangs out with avowed, tattooed, neo-nazis and whose outright and abject denial of historical events forms the very foundation for holocaust denial.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
it's funny how quickly you went from denying there was a switch, to now demanding evidence that the obvious switch was due to "racial elements".

so let's see: for 20 elections in a row, ranging from the end of reconstruction to the passing of the civil rights law, the south voted for democrats, every single time, without fail.

then, once civil rights passed, they voted for republican barry goldwater, a strict opponent of civil rights, racial segregationist george wallace, a strict opponent of civil rights, richard nixon, who employed the "southern strategy" to win votes from those who objected to desegregation and civil rights, reagan, who continued that southern strategy, and then every single republican, every single time up to and including trump most recently.

but yeah, probably had nothing to do with the hatred that southern racists like you have for the civil rights act, eh?

you dumb, stupid mother fucker.

get mental health therapy.

People are free to switch however they like. The south, just like the rest of the country, swtiched to Republican hard in the 70's and 80's.

But your claim is that your parties racist past is somehow negated by this switch. There were over 1200 racists Democrats in Congress in the 20th century and you have named one that switched. Strom Thurmond.

Your theory is not well thought out.

Translation of your ramblings: The white vote switched in the 70's-80's after and because of civil rights. Still sticking with that?

FWIW this was your position a page ago but you're dragging it out for some reason............
 
Last edited:

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?

maybe we just have different definitions of what is racist.

for example, i have the correct definition of what is racist, and you are a deluded, uneducated, civil rights hating, racial segregation encouraging, neo-confederate, who hangs out with avowed, tattooed, neo-nazis and whose outright and abject denial of historical events forms the very foundation for holocaust denial.
You know your argument is sound when its full of a bunch of made up character attacks. Good job flexing that old Democrat KKK muscle.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You know your argument is sound when its full of a bunch of made up character attacks. Good job flexing that old Democrat KKK muscle.
so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?

the KKK endorsed trump, by the way. the KKK was founded by conservative southerners who hated civil rights and desegregation, like yourself.

you literally have no argument, only outright denial and delusion.

seek mental health therapy.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?

maybe we just have different definitions of what is racist.

for example, i have the correct definition of what is racist, and you are a deluded, uneducated, civil rights hating, racial segregation encouraging, neo-confederate, who hangs out with avowed, tattooed, neo-nazis and whose outright and abject denial of historical events forms the very foundation for holocaust denial.
Oh, not just "called for", he PLEADED for it.
And those boys were, of course, completely innocent. A STAIN on NYC. (Drumpf AND the 'Central Park Five'.)

When he's plotting with the other devils around the Oval Office cauldron, how many times do you think they use the word 'ni**er' in reference to Barack? Dim bulb rust belt retards really ought to keep their yappers SHUT about shit they've go no fucking clue about. For real. Maybe THEY "should be executed".

But hey - He's got his resident looney tune/Stepin Fetchit Ben Carson on-hand as well as a few slimebag Jewish, Iranian, and Italian 'connections', so he's obviously NOT racist in ANY way,
duhhhhh! Cowardice, vile WHITE garbage.

IMG_2256.JPG

IMG_2257.JPG

IMG_2258.JPG
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh, not just "called for", he PLEADED for it.
And those boys were, of course, completely innocent. A STAIN on NYC. (Drumpf AND the 'Central Park Five'.)

When he's plotting with the other devils around the Oval Office cauldron, how many times do you think they use the word 'ni**er' in reference to Barack? Dim bulb rust belt retards really ought to keep their yappers SHUT about shit they've go no fucking clue about. For real. Maybe THEY "should be executed".

But hey - He's got his resident looney tune/Stepin Fetchit Ben Carson on-hand as well as a few slimebag Jewish, Iranian, and Italian 'connections', so he's obviously NOT racist in ANY way,
duhhhhh! Cowardice, vile WHITE garbage.

View attachment 3902219

View attachment 3902220

View attachment 3902221
purple pooey has gone straight off the deep end in the last few days.

any guesses on what has triggered his obvious psychotic break?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
no.

the south, after voting for democrats in every single election from the end of reconstruction to the passing of the civil rights law, switched to voting for republicans and racial segregationists every single time since the passing of the civil rights law.

the rest of the country did not vote with anywhere near this level of unanimity, no matter how many times you try to repeat the lie.

you shitheaded, delusional, neo-confederate, neo-nazi befriending, civil rights hating, racial segragtionist fuck.

your claim is that there was no switch in the electoral politics of the south.

that is beyond delusional.
No. I said the racists stayed in the Democrat Party and that your theory the racists switched parties is based on one person, Strom Thurmond. Which it is. Now your are moving to broad voting trends.

your attempts at outright denial of easily observable historical events sets the table for holocaust denial, which i'm sure was a friendly topic for you when your neo-nazi fishing buddy with the hitler tattoos brought it up on the boat.

you are not well. seek mental health therapy.
The racist elements of the Democratic Party which overwhelmingly voted against civil rights, remained Democrats. They did not switch.
You can't refute this, so now I'm a nazi? Too funny.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
your theory the racists switched parties is based on one person, Strom Thurmond. Which it is.
only if you ignore everyone else who switched parties, like jesse helms, robert byrd, and many, many others.

this was already discussed, but you have not taken note since you have clearly hit a psychotic break and are detached from reality completely.

The racist elements of the Democratic Party which overwhelmingly voted against civil rights.
northern democrats voted in favor of civil rights. are you really this fucking stupid?

nothing you say has any basis in reality whatsoever, gets refuted, and you keep repeating it.

have you suffered a head in jury in the last few days or something?

you've fucking lost it, nazi.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
purple pooey has gone straight off the deep end in the last few days.

any guesses on what has triggered his obvious psychotic break?
The impending impeachment of his 'great white whale' overlord? Bannon didn't return his 'friend request'? Food stamps have run dry? His fat ugly wife ran off with another redneck?

Who can tell......better still, who cares?

Hopefully cancer/a fatal car crash isn't too far off......
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?

the KKK endorsed trump, by the way. the KKK was founded by conservative southerners who hated civil rights and desegregation, like yourself.

you literally have no argument, only outright denial and delusion.

seek mental health therapy.
Harry Truman paid his dues to the Klan, your theory is that Truman was a Southern Conservative? You got a lot of baseless theories going on here.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Harry Truman paid his dues to the Klan, your theory is that Truman was a Southern Conservative? You got a lot of baseless theories going on here.
you can go chase your truman bunnies all day long with your neo-nazi friend who has the "hiel hitler" tattoos, jew hater.

i am asking you a simple question based on your blatant denial of reality:

so it was not racist at all when he called for the execution of 5 black men who had been completely exonerated and proven 100% innocent by DNA evidence?
 
Top