KillerIndica
Well-Known Member
Three: Mossberg 500, Remington 870 in .308, and Ruger 10/22.
Another mass shooting.
- Thread starter Unclebaldrick
- Start date
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
Planning a mass shooting, Killa?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
He's going to need more guns. (70,000,000 - 26) people left to murder.
Last edited:
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You lied on the forms too, didn't you.
too larry
Well-Known Member
Not sure if it's a real thing, or just scare tactic, but I saw that the new AG had sent reminders to gun dealers in legal states that it was against the law to sell guns or ammo to pot users. Some said they were going to check medical users against background checks, but I think that was a scare tactic from our side.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Hey, remember that "bump stock ban" that had such promise after Vegas. The one that even the NRA was in favor of? Well, after the shooting died down the NRA reversed themselves and Congress is refusing to act. So it's bump stocks for everyone! It is what the founding fathers wanted.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
I believe this is true, but was left to the seller's discretion.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
There are people here that want those too.
too larry
Well-Known Member
No doubt. I'm a collector of old guns. A long time since I shot very much. Been a couple of years since I bought a gun, so I might be recovering.
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
I can agree the laws need to be changed. Some more restrictions. Something needs to be done about the fact this guy should have never been sold this gun.
My argument is that there was a failure somewhere. Its saddens me that when a person that is a clear threat simply walks into a gun store and walks out with a gun.
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
Sure.
Why only care about guns though? Your statement can be applied to something as simple as cars and Tylenol.
This guy should have been turned down for the gun. Fix that problem.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
I dont see a reason civilians especially in urban areas need assault rifles, do you?
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
No such thing as an assault rifles. Simply a hunting rifle with scary black stocks and larger magazine. The ar15 is one of the smallest rifle cartridges made.
If I were inclined I'm sure as much damage could be inflicted with hunting rifles and ten round mags.
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
They are designed to do maximum damage to flesh, so they're not really a hunting rifle. And the fact that they have or except larger clips is a clear definition between the two weapons, don't play dumb.
Do you see any logical reason a civilian especially in an urban setting needs an assault weapon?
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
All guns assault.
The ar15 is a very small round. Most hunting rifles do way more damage.
I won't agree with an outright ban on "assault" rifles.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
It's not necessarily the guns, it's the open access to them that stupid/unstable people have.
We need to restrict how they're sold, not the gun itself imo.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
It's a very small round delivered at very high velocity meaning it has greater kinetic energy than most larger rounds. The round is designed to cause "liquefaction" which creates a shock wave that pulverizes tissue. That's generally not the objective of a hunter. It is the objective of a killer.