Anita Hill 2.0

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I do get it and just happen to disagree with your assessment of it being a good idea to dismiss highly scrutinized individuals based on unverifiable claims from the distant past. Can you not see how this would be used against future candidates that you may like?
Democrats don’t nominate rapists though

You simply can’t defend kavanaugh. Why not just ask for a different nominee rather than try to defend a rapist?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I do get it and just happen to disagree with your assessment of it being a good idea to dismiss highly scrutinized individuals based on unverifiable claims from the distant past. Can you not see how this would be used against future candidates that you may like?
Don't defend rapists.
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
Democrats don’t nominate rapists though

You simply can’t defend kavanaugh. Why not just ask for a different nominee rather than try to defend a rapist?
If some proof emerges beyond "he tried as a teen to rape me at a time and place unspecified" then by all means a different nominee would be required. Did you call the Duke Lacrosse team rapists before the evidence was heard? Probably.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If some proof emerges beyond "he tried as a teen to rape me at a time and place unspecified" then by all means a different nominee would be required. Did you call the Duke Lacrosse team rapists before the evidence was heard? Probably.
Why would she tell her therapist about this years ago if it were made up?

You’re retarded

Stop defending rapists
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
You didn’t answer the question

Why are her classmates saying that they all heard about kavanaugh’s rape attempt?
Maybe he attempted to rape her? Please cite the source of fellow students corroborating the story that have not since recanted, I haven't seen it yet but probably missed it.
 
Top