A Tale of The Tape HPA vs 21st Century Flood and Drain

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
This Journal is a tale of 2 distinctly different hydro methods= High Pressure Aero and what I call my 21st Century Flood & Drain. I think you will find the latter to be extremely simple with the potential for outstanding results.

I am using the same DM nutes in both, mixed as a single batch then dumped into the respective rezes. Grow ppms @ 420
:bigjoint: Once I flip ~ 600 and NO more than 800 at full bloom. No bloom boosters needed, or wanted, though during flower I add a bit of DM Potash+.

I have been working through HPA (high Pressure Aero) for 5 grows. Now on my 6th, and all is well- Finally!

HPA was developed by NASA to feed astronauts on space stations. It is the most efficient method in that it uses no soil or medium AND it uses a very small amount of liquid nutrients delivering them under pressure (~ 60-120 psi). The nutes are pumped from a separate rez through high pressure tubing into small mist heads creating an atomized mist with a droplet sizes ranging from ~ 30--80 microns. Each feeding is < 1 second roughly every 1-2 minutes, depending on ambient conditions.

Roots fed this way look nothing like any other roots. First they are loaded with lateral roots (fish bones). When the RH inside the pod is optimal, each fish bone grows root hairs (think pipe cleaner fuzzies). The massive surface area created by the fuzzies provides maximum nutrient uptake. The root photos are not quite dialed in

Root Pics 5 days ago. Still dialing wt cycle in. Currently 1 sec on/1:55 seconds off during lights on; 3:55 off during dark cycle
IMG_0940.jpgIMG_0942.jpg

Most HPA growers use a sophisticated system, including pressurized storage tanks, pressure relief valves, pressure gauges, and solenoids to perfect the amount of atomized nutrient during each wet cycle.

Since my HPA roots can be similarly efficient, I chose not to carry my idea to their exacting standards. I use a hpa pump (Aquatec 8800) + a Sentinel Digital Timer, which is not 100% accurate @ 1 sec wet cycle intervals. When the RH inside my pod is conducive, I get root hairs, but due to not having a controlled grow room environment, root hairs are hit and miss. Still, my hpa roots provide considerably more surface area (to slurp up nutes) than any other method. How important that is, we shall see.

Now, hpa has been a RPITA (mostly pilot error), but I am confident my simplified version will produce excellent results.

HPA pic taken 4 days ago


IMG_0945.jpg

During my last hpa grow all seemed well. The plants looked really healthy until I cut the light cycle from 18/6 to 12/12. Every morning the plants were wilted. It took me ~ 2 weeks to realize the problem was that the Sentinel timer needed to be set for 24 hours, but comes preset from the factory at 12: 12 hours without nutes was causing the roots to dry out, consequently the plants were wilting.

Out of desperation to save these plants, I quickly tossed together a F & D rig with hardware I had on hand. Since I did not have a conventional F & D tray, I used a 18G Rubbermaid tote, which is much deeper than flood tables. I ran a drain line to my outboard rez. I used a low pressure pump to flood. Since the plants had a root system I put them in 3" net pots and topped them with hydroton. These I placed near the bottom of the Rubbermaid tote and covered them with lava rock. I started out feeding them ~3 hours.

Brain Fart #1. Due to the fast draining of lava rock, combined with the fact that lava rock has a very rough texture with lots of tiny pockets, which are ideal to trap a bit of moisture, I decided to experiment and flood more frequently. Eventually I was flooding ~ 45 minutes (now use 1 hour) and the growth was/is "off the hook". (see photo from last (first) grow). The problem was, I had 3 plants in there and one plant quickly dominated the other two; I had no way to move (or remove) them as all were locked into the lava rock with roots intertwined.

It was about this time that I bought a bunch of Air Pots to experiment with outside and inside in case I wasn't able to solve my hpa issues.

Brain Fart #2 Instead of dumping a bunch of lava rock in the bottom of the Rubbermaid tote I decided next grow (this one) to fill the APs with lava rock, and put them inside the Rubbermaid.

Back to last (first) attempt: As I was cobbling this rig together (with near dead plants) so I didn't waste time. I simply ran 1" pvc over the top of the tote, and let it flood (~ 3").

Brain Fart #3: Instead of simply letting the table flood to roughly 3"s, I decided to go all Bellagio and create a water show. I made a 'U" out of the pvc so that it ran the length of the tote. I drilled a bunch of small holes so that when the pump came on the nutes were streaming out of the holes while being aerated AND splashing on ~ 5" of the plant as well as top of the lava rock, working their way down through the roots. BAM!

Findings:

The high walls of the tote provide a rain forest like environment for young plants. They love the humidity, but probably only because the lava rock drains quickly, so they are not drowning in it.

Pics from first F & D attempt. The actual plant was over 7 ft. I snapped it at 3ft, ran it parallel to the table for anther 3 ft, then began LST curling it wround under the HO T5. It was over 7ft with ~ 10 3ft side branches

IMG_0883.jpgIMG_0881.jpgIMG_0878.jpgIMG_0879.jpg

Current F & D Pics

#2 was taken 4 days prior to # 2!

IMG_0882.jpgIMG_0943.jpg IMG_0947.jpg

Note pic #2 the plant in front is in small AP, sitting on a 6" platform. Yesterday I transferred it to a 1G AP by simply putting it (in tact) inside the 1G and adding lava rock around the sides. No replant shock or trauma!

At this moment the two method are running neck and neck-if anything the F & D primary leaves are a bit larger. This could be due to the rain forest environment. I could add sidewalls to my hpa to test. Time will tell, but based on my first attempt + what I am seeing now, there is no reason to complicate your grow with hpa, PLUS, it's a lot more expensive to assemble.

Lighting

Until LED achieves it's true potential for growing mj (it is getting better!) I am sticking with HO T5s. There are a couple cool threads on RIU discussing using them with bulbs from the aquarium industry, so I won't duplicate that here. UV Lighting is hard at work developing a line of bulbs specifically for horticulture. The beauty is bulbs are now available to optimize veg, while others for flower, consequently they can be tailored for either Indica or Sats. Plus, bulb changes are done with the twist of the wrist. This allows for one fixture to be optimal for either(or both) veg or flower.

I have an 8 bulb Quantum Bad Boy (432w), but if I had it to do over again I would get 2 @ 4 bulb, which provides more flexibility; makes it easier to supplement with both IR and UVb, which should each be in the center and on separate timers.

In veg

I only use 4-6 bulbs.

Quantum Grow bulbs + UVL AquaSun
+ Wave Point Coral Wave, CWs be replaced once I find small IR bulbs (< 40 watts) to run ~ 10 minutes immediately at lights out.

Flower

ZooMed
FloraSun + UVL ASs + UVL Red Life + UVL 660 (no name yet)

I expect to flip to flower in ~ 2- 3 weeks max.

Stay tuned for weekly updates.

 

PSUAGRO.

Well-Known Member
Awesome...........subbed........in theory HPA should allow for large production capabilities.......good luck/hope it works out for you:)
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Sigh, I just pulled a male from my hpa. He was ~ 3" taller than the others. Looks like the other 3 are females though. I moved him to the downstairs starter/clone closet to collect his pollen.

Not as bad as it sounds as 4 massive root balls take up too much volume in the pod. 3 is probably max. I have mist heads on opposite sides to make sure they get sufficient nutes.

While in the grow room I filtered my F & D nutes and re pHed. Damn. The large plant in the back had a huge growth spurt since this morning!
:mrgreen:
 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
Time will tell, but based on my first attempt + what I am seeing now, there is no reason to complicate your grow with hpa, PLUS, it's a lot more expensive to assemble.
I think it would be more fair to say that with HPA that falls short (sans accumulator, etc.) it may not be possible to get good results. Like it's been said before, it seems to be an "all or nothing" type of thing. You have done a good service to the community however, because no one will argue that you didn't try very hard to make it work, and if you couldn't get worthwhile results that way with all your hard work, no one can. :)
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
I think it would be more fair to say that with HPA that falls short (sans accumulator, etc.) it may not be possible to get good results. Like it's been said before, it seems to be an "all or nothing" type of thing. You have done a good service to the community however, because no one will argue that you didn't try very hard to make it work, and if you couldn't get worthwhile results that way with all your hard work, no one can. :)
As I have had massive roots with hairs (sans accum), I put the problem of consistency on a lack of a controlled environment. In moderate weather I get root hairs. Too cold or too hot (usually the problem) I do not. But I think it is more than this.

I THINK that the high walls in my F & D (could easily be incorporated into HPA) provide the humidity to the plant that seems to act as a catalyst, especially during early veg stages.
Also my Bellagio flooding method provides freshly oxygenated nutes directly onto ~ 5" of the plant itself. The 2 plants in my F & D are much bushier, whereas the 3 in hpa are more cola like

Will post new pics of both tomorrow

FYI: I edited the initial Journal text for spelling errors and clarification
 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
As I have had massive roots with hairs (sans accum), I put the problem of consistency on a lack of a controlled environment. In moderate weather I get root hairs. Too cold or too hot (usually the problem) I do not. But I think it is more than this.

I THINK that the high walls in my F & D (could easily be incorporated into HPA) provide the humidity to the plant that seems to act as a catalyst, especially during early veg stages.
Also my Bellagio flooding method provides freshly oxygenated nutes directly onto ~ 5" of the plant itself. The 2 plants in my F & D are much bushier, whereas the 3 in hpa are more cola like

Will post new pics of both tomorrow

FYI: I edited the initial Journal text for spelling errors and clarification
Yes, aero is finicky to begin with, and what I get out of your experiences is it is even harder to meet the right conditions without an accumulator. In the end, I think you're new style will give you personally better results considering all your particular variables. There is alot you could read on transpiration and humidity. Obviously you cannot have so much humidity during flower, for mold issues if nothing else... For now I am watching with interest, keep up the good work PF :)
 

Atomizer

Well-Known Member
I`m inclined to agree with TB, the pumped HPA is falling short of providing the ideal environment, otherwise it would outperform the walled F&D.
If you find the walled F&D is doing a better job then its worth sticking with...results are what counts :)
 

Bob Smith

Well-Known Member
I`m inclined to agree with TB, the pumped HPA is falling short of providing the ideal environment, otherwise it would outperform the walled F&D.
If you find the walled F&D is doing a better job then its worth sticking with...results are what counts :)
Yup, what these two said.

Well done ____ will outperform poorly done ____ virtually all the time.

Pet, not sure if anyone has suggested this, but I think you would LOVE to try out some LP aero...........*just* about as fast as HPA with 10% of the effort :)

Spend $100 on a mag drive pump and some PVC/sprinklers and then let us know how that compares to F&D ;)
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
LP aero should be a lot slower than HPA, unless you overmist in a big way :)
That was my first attempt at aero. Sucked big time. Even running hpa in a cloner on a timer with minimum of 20 second on produced typical dwc roots.

All I am saying about the high walls is that it should also enhance true hpa or AA

Been dialing back the pause in 5 second intervals. I am finally getting root hairs at ~ 1/1:50. Doh, should have realized that warmer weather requires shortening the wet intervals. Just reduced again to 1/1:45

Pics hpa


The pic on the left is the bushiest male I've seen, though balls haven't developed yet, it has the internodal signature
IMG_0948.jpgIMG_0949.jpgIMG_0950.jpg


Pics F & D

Note how much bigger F & D primary leafs are, as well as how high they have grown above the tote lip
.

Happily both are female. Also both are reaching up to the lights

IMG_0951.jpgIMG_0952.jpg




 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
Very healthy and green pf... Seems you have your veg nutes dialed in perfectly. :)

Internodal signature? Have you placed the energy stone in the new setup?
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Very healthy and green pf... Seems you have your veg nutes dialed in perfectly. :)

Internodal signature? Have you placed the energy stone in the new setup?
I shoot for 420 max in veg. Fitting, don't you think?

Yes, in the rez, in the pod plus a large Amethyst arrow head shape crystal between the plants on top. Shit I need to put one in the F & D rez. Thanks!
 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
I shoot for 420 max in veg. Fitting, don't you think?

Yes, in the rez, in the pod plus a large Amethyst arrow head shape crystal between the plants on top. Shit I need to put one in the F & D rez. Thanks!
:) Hey meant to ask, what is the "Tape" part in the title referring to?
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Figure of speech regarding measurement. Thought it would capture the attention of people seeing it in New Posts
 

Bob Smith

Well-Known Member
LP aero should be a lot slower than HPA, unless you overmist in a big way :)
I'd frankly love to see who besides you and TF can outproduce a properly done LP aero setup - I see guys worried about their root hairs when the roots (and the plant) are telling them that they're doing something wrong...............yes, both done ideally HP is gonna be faster (although how much more is anyone's guess, I'd throw a 5-8% number out there pulled from my ass), but the number of people I've seen do HP ideally I can count on one hand..............I was there for about a month or two, for what that's worth :)

Frankly, I see LP aero roots look a lot healthier than Pet's (no offense, Pet) in any journal from a grower who knows what he/she is doing in LP aero.
 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
I'd frankly love to see who besides you and TF can outproduce a properly done LP aero setup - I see guys worried about their root hairs when the roots (and the plant) are telling them that they're doing something wrong...............yes, both done ideally HP is gonna be faster (although how much more is anyone's guess, I'd throw a 5-8% number out there pulled from my ass), but the number of people I've seen do HP ideally I can count on one hand..............I was there for about a month or two, for what that's worth :)

Frankly, I see LP aero roots look a lot healthier than Pet's (no offense, Pet) in any journal from a grower who knows what he/she is doing in LP aero.
It's really strange to me, all the info is out there, to be able to do what A and tf do, but it seems everyone tries to put their own spin on it, or make it better before they even get it to work how it is proven to work, or perhaps cut a corner here or there. The problem is the info really has to be followed to a T in my book. Only then once you have gotten the results can you decide how to change things up or experiment. I guess a major part of it is that the methods and mindset for HPA practically go against everyting your mom ever told you about LP aero (if she was that cool- lol). So I think people that have never ran aero or hydro before likely have a better chance at going HPA successfully- although they're the least likely to subscribe to it.

It's painfully clear to me that you can't get HPA to work without an accumulator, or without a large enough chamber- or without the right nozzles, or without the right timer capable of the fractions of a second increments and short runs of JG line from the solenoids to the misters. For some reason everyone comes into this thinking they can get by without one or two of these things, and they end up with the world's most expensive and complicated sprinkler setup. I wouldn't be surprised if old fashined soil wouldn't outperform some of the frankenstein HPA system attempts out there I've seen.
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Here's my logic for not complicating hpa with accums/solenoids, etc. First there are so many variables to deal with, even in a controlled environment, so I being pragmatic by nature, intuited that if I can get 90% of the benefits using 50% of the hardware my results should be way ahead of any other method. I felt that way until I started my vastly simpler and reasonably priced F & D rig.


Bob Smith


First thanks for dropping in, but please MY journal is not about lp. I've done it, and seen it done many times. Never have I seen roots that compare to the pics I posted. You can start your own thread/journal to show what you can do. Anyone interssted will sub it.


Also, Atomizer, knowing full well hat I was/am using a stripped down version of hpa, has been extremely helpful over the last couple years. So if you have any negativity regarding him, please do it in a PM, NOT IN MY JOURNAL. Thank You
 

Trichy Bastard

Well-Known Member
Here's my logic for not complicating hpa with accums/solenoids, etc. First there are so many variables to deal with, even in a controlled environment, so I being pragmatic by nature, intuited that if I can get 90% of the benefits using 50% of the hardware my results should be way ahead of any other method. I felt that way until I started my vastly simpler and reasonably priced F & D rig.
Understood- it started out as a good logic, but it seems it's a harder nut to crack than that. Apparently you have to have it nearly 100% correct in order to achieve the light misting necessary to obtain any of the benefits at all. There are a lot of variables, but I think in a weird way you ended up having even more by not having an accumulator. You had to be seriously on your game and every turn of the corner and temperature change brought you issues. One good thing is that you'll be able to breeze through any other style as surely none will be so complex as your brand of HPA. :) I really hope this new stuff you're trying out gives some good results!

I guess the cool thing is you always got enough for your private reserve- so you have some room to play around with your hobby and every ounce yielded isn't mission critical to you like some other people around here.
 
Top