A funny conversation.

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
  • This is a long read, but it is very interesting how it pans out. I took a lot of time to erase the real names and put in new one's. If you have the time, and nothing else to do, please, i encourage you to enlighten me with your thought's and opinions on this conversation. If it spans out any further, i will keep you posted.

    Thanks in advance for the time spent reading, and time spent replying, it means a lot to me.




    Katie:

    i believe in existence, i believe in life. i believe in love. i believe the the fundamental self. i believe in the universe. I believe in wholeness. i believe in creations. I believe in connections. I believe in energy. I believe in vibration. I believe in growth. I believe in expression. I believe in expansion. i believe in multidimensionality. I believe in synchronicity.

    These are, in my mind, one, all the same thing, and two, axioms, like mathematical truths that one perceives and cannot deny. All my ideas interpreted as "true" or "false" are just articulations and artistic expressions the the same one thing.

    Taking an idea, and saying it is false is like looking at art and saying that it is false. It does not make sense.

    Zaehet
    :
    I'm not saying it is false, nor am i saying it is true... i'm saying you, nor i, know with any amount of certainty if our ideas are true... or false.

    We could be completely wrong, or right... so to say with certainty that our ideas we have about the universe and reality is certainly true... is certainly a lie.

    Katie:
    i don't think you get it
    in your mind, does it make sense to look at a piece of art, and say "I'll never be certain if this art is wrong (which means false)"
    ?

    Zaehet:
    art is not a belief about existence or reality

    Katie:
    you still dont get it.
    beliefs are just artistic expressions, we take what we see and create something that is symbolic. it is never right or wrong, just likeart cannot be right or wrong, it just IS

    Zaehet:
    nah, you don't get it, i am trying to explain to you... that you're beliefs about existence, reality, and death, you can't be sure if they are true or not, nor matter what they are.... because there are an infinite number of possibilities of what they are, what they could be, and what could happen.

    Because none of us truly know... no matter how hard me might tell ourselves we do.

    Katie:
    and it like you dont understand anything i ever say

    Zaehet:
    So when you tell me you know you have a soul, and you are not your body etc. etc. , i know you are lying, because you don't know that for sure.

    Zaehet:
    no but i do understand

    you are tryin to say that your beliefs are merely a poetic expression of what you want to be true, right?

    Katie:
    you misunderstand
    and we've already been over this, over, andover, and over again

    Zaehet:
    explain it to me as simply as you can then.
    with as few words as possible

    Katie:
    i DO NOT KNNNOOOOWWW I HAVE A SOUL

    Zaehet:
    k good, first step lol

    Katie:
    i know i am a self, my self is a soul, it is something i perceive, and beause you are trapped in definitios are limit your mind, you cannot understand what that means, its not knowlegde, its an understanding of who i am
    do you beleive you have a self?

    Zaehet:
    yes, i make myself, every single day, just like you... i am merely the choices i make... which is all dependent on the environment i grew up in, the society i grew up in, the way i was raised, and how i, and you, personally chose to react to each and every situation and experience that arose by chance, from the time we were born, until now, this moment.

    Katie:
    do you believe you have a self?
    ....

    Zaehet:
    define self

    Katie:
    you know what self is

    Zaehet:
    .... i do, but i think your meaning of self is different

    Katie:
    how so?
    self is the thing that makes you- you

    Zaehet:
    self= merely the choices i make... which is all dependent on the environment i grew up in, the society i grew up in, the way i was raised, and how i, and you, personally chose to react to each and every situation and experience that arose by chance, from the time we were born, until now, this moment.
    self= ego

    Zaehet:
    http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=self&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=MdB8UJLcG8a40gHDg4HIDQ&ved=0CBwQkQ4&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=f49d5c828409ff24&bpcl=35277026&biw=1024&bih=602

    this is self, but i think you are trying to say it is something else.

    Zaehet:
    if we are gonna talk to each other, we have to make sure what we are trying to say is completely and utterly understood without a doubt.

    Katie:
    your self is not the thoughts you think?

    Zaehet:
    yes that is part of it, but the thoughts i think are all dependent on the environment i grew up in, the society i grew up in, the way i was raised, and how i, and you, personally chose to react to each and every situation and experience that arose by chance, from the time we were born, until now, this moment.

    Katie:
    (and that not possibly, its even perpastuous that you assert that)
    cool, and your self is not the feeelings you feel?

    Zaehet:
    yes, and those are dependent on the same things i keep pasting.

    Katie:
    ok, thats a beautiful interprations of what CAUSED your self to be your self, but now we came to a defintion od what self is, it is what makes you you
    do you beleive you have a self, that wich makes you, you?
    ....?

    Zaehet:
    dude, i keep trying to tell you, ive said it over and over again, you are trying to use the word self as a different definition.

    yes i believe in me, and i am merely the choices i make... which is all dependent on the environment i grew up in, the society i grew up in, the way i was raised, and how i, and you, personally chose to react to each and every situation and experience that arose by chance, from the time we were born, until now, this moment.

    thats me, my self, what makes me me, my self.

    self = ego

    Zaehet:
    if what you think is self... is something else, explain it to me...


    i already know katie, that when you use the word self... you are really trying to use the word soul.
    The spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal.......

    Zaehet:
    There is a HUGE difference. Yes i believe in myself, no i do not believe in a soul... because there is no evidence, no proof, no nothing to base it on. I believe in me because i am here, i can touch me, i think, so i have legit proof, as far as i can tell... even though i may not be certain, yes, i believe i do exist.

    Zaehet:
    The universe continues to tell us through the death of stars, black holes, super nova, pulsars, neutron stars... it keeps telling us over and over again, that nothing lasts forever... and that everything eventually gets broken down into the smallest particles... atoms, and dispersed or (recycled) back into the universe.
    Why should the universe treat us feeble humans any differently than it treats itself?

    Katie:
    it seems like you are ating imcompetant, im sorry if im going to be offensive, but it is like you do not understand anything i say, it is like you are having a conversation with someone who is not me, so i'd rather have you PRETEND you were talking to me, becasue that is what this feels like.

    you NEVER said more than ONE time that we were using different defintions. we JUST deteremined that a self is what makes you you. you had an extenional defintions of that which makes you you is your choices, thoughts, and feelings, it doesnt really matter because its extensional. Then you went on and on irrelevantly about what CAUSED you to be you, which like i already imply is IRRELENT to the point at hand. I never said that i thought the self was something ELSE, i dont know what the FUCK you think that, your own mind is twisting you into these loops and it seems like you are completely STUCK in a rut, unable to conceputally move, and im SICK of having the same conversation with you over and over and over again, when you never listen to me. if you were to say, "Yes i have a self, that which MAKES ME ME" that is the EXACT SAME THING in my mind as saying "Yes i have a soul" its not saying anything ELSE, its NOT DIFFERENT likefor SOME REASON you think it is. its the exact same thing. and im sorry, but im done talking with you tonight. think about, seriously za. stop opening your mouth without EVER thinking about what i say, it annoying, and feels like a waste of my time.

    Zaehet:
    ok, i will answer your question, yes, i do think it is true that i am my self
    you asked, "do you believe you have a self, that witch makes you, you?"

    im not swearing, im not getting angry, im trying to understand you Katie, and im trying to understand you EXACTLY without a doubt of what you are talking about.

    Zaehet:
    Next time you get on, we can continue where we left of, you asked me

    "do you believe you have a self, that which makes you, you?"

    my answer is

    " yes, i do think it is true that i am my self, and that i make me, me."
 

Attachments

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
I do not think you are being honest with yourself Z. If you want to stay true to your philosophical ideas then you must drop all forms of knowing, and get rid of the loophool you created for yourself to avoid your biggest fear of not knowing and understand that you dont know if its possible to know anything metaphysical. I think you will be humbled when that realization comes to you. I tried not to respond in a smug, antagonizing tone that we share in our exchanges so you can take some time and actually think about this... (No, Im not dead. Computer technician fucked up and its like I have windows 98 now so I hate going on the computer lol)
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
If you want to stay true to your philosophical ideas then you must drop all forms of knowing
^^^How many times must i restate this same fucking statement over, and over, and over again.^^^






We could be completely wrong, or right... so to say with certainty that our ideas we have about the universe, reality, GOD and death is certainly true... is certainly a lie.


I don't know, and neither do you, if there is or isn't a god, nor do we know what happens when we die.


The fuck else do you expect from me when you say drop all forms of knowing when i continue to explain over and over again that i accept the fact that I DO NOT FUCKING KNOW. (And neither do you!)

Yet you continuously contradict yourself by saying "drop all forms of not knowing" but wait, i KNOW that there is a god!

Fucking pathetic bro, sorry, i really don't mean to be aggressive or mean, but man, you haven't even got a clue on how many of your statements contradict themselves.
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
You are showing the same frustration that you caused your friend to feel. Its impossible to know anything, yet you KNOW theres no way of knowing if theres a god/soul? I heard Neer say that he doesnt know if its possible to know about god/souls, is Neer lying to himself? Sorry for my opinion dude, but I think this certainty that theres no way to know about god/souls is stopping you from growing as a person. Once you realize that you dont know if its possible to know about the metaphysical then you will be more like the chill dude who picked up that guy on his way to work, instead of an antagonistic philosophical predator looking to clash heads with believers like he has something to prove. You have nothing to prove man, be true to yourself.
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
What is it, that allows us to differentiate between what we know, what we think we know, and what we tell ourselves we know?


Evidence and proof.


"Experience" tells us nothing but what we experience, and we know, as human animals, that what we merely experience, has fallibility.

How are we to differentiate between what is reality, and what is not?

Tangible evidence, and proof.

Because the human animal mind is fallible, we can hallucinate, become delusional, we can pretend, we can use our imaginations to create what we want, instead of excepting what is.







I know, that since the human animal mind is fallible, that no matter what we "experience" there is always room for it to be "wrong" if not just as much room for it to be "right"

There is no way for us to know whether or not this is a computer simulation, than there is to know whether or not the christian, or any other indoctrination, superstition, or idea is true, or false.

How do you know god is real without proof, and even WITH proof... how do you know it isn't your mind playing tricks on you, or that you aren't really in a computer simulation and something else is playing a trick on you?



How
do you know that reality isn't just a dream?






You don't know, i know you don't know, i don't know, i know that i don't know, because there are infinite different possibilities, how can you say that yours is the right one? You fucking can't bro.

But yes, you can pretend to know, billions do it, every single day... you are not alone.
 

Chief Walkin Eagle

Well-Known Member
I think the anger you express is from me bringing up the biggest fear that you still hold, which is not knowing. Take your night terrors for example. You were able to get over your BIGGEST fear of the unknown yet you couldnt get over childish fears of the Boogey Man? C'mon now Z. Drop this loophole you created for yourself and experience a side of life where you dont have to attack people because they believe things that you find ridiculous.

You can pretend to know that its impossible to know the metaphysical, the dishonest do it everyday, you are not alone :wink:
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
I do not think you are being honest with yourself Z. If you want to stay true to your philosophical ideas then you must drop all forms of knowing, and get rid of the loophool you created for yourself to avoid your biggest fear of not knowing and understand that you dont know if its possible to know anything metaphysical. I think you will be humbled when that realization comes to you. I tried not to respond in a smug, antagonizing tone that we share in our exchanges so you can take some time and actually think about this... (No, Im not dead. Computer technician fucked up and its like I have windows 98 now so I hate going on the computer lol)
No problem. Take your time in coming back, bro. No loss...
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
You can pretend to know that its impossible to know the metaphysical, the dishonest do it everyday, you are not alone :wink:
I am not saying it is impossible Cheif, you literally refuse to understand. I am saying that regardless of what you think is possible or not... there is always the same possibility any of our ideas about existence, reality, or death of being wrong, as there is of it being right.

To say with certainty that your, or my, ideas we have about the universe, reality and death is certainly true... is certainly a lie.

When you say you know for certain that god exists, all of us know... that you are lying. (Even if you convince yourself that you are not)

And we would all hope, that someday, you will be able to recognize and understand that.

I know for certain, that uncertainty is a part of life that all of us human animals must deal with... and those of us who cant, will pretend to be certain about our certainty...

instead of those of us who are courageous enough understand and accept the truth, that the only thing we can be certain of... is our uncertainty.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Hey, Zaehet. It seems that Katie didn't feel like she was being heard or understood. She seemed to be saying that she considers a soul and a sense of self or I-ness to be the same thing. I'm not sure if she was saying that a soul was eternal/supernatural or not, but by how she opened up the conversation I would assume she's into a lot of woo ideas. Her saying that no belief is right or wrong is clearly, uh, wrong ;) Ideas, speculations, and imaginings are not automatically as valid as beliefs that are formed by critical thinking and empirical evidence, just because we want them to be. She doesn't seem to understand reality on very fundamental levels, she seems to value thinking as entertainment and aesthetic pleasure as opposed to a vehicle to discern reality. Most people I meet are like this, I don't spend much time conversing with them, it doesn't usually go anywhere...
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
That was an amazing reply, much more than i had expected, i wish i had some rep to give you. Thank's so much bro, means a lot. You know it does, ill be letting her know of the ideas you shared with me.
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
She is afraid to tell me what she really means when she says the word "self" because she is attempting to use it in an entirely different fashion than what it really is. Both her and i know this, which is why she is reluctant to give me her definition of "self" because it has supernatural and unquantifiable qualities.

She is trying to claim certainty about this supernatural and unquantifiable idea, yet she is trying to skirt saying this, because she knows deep down it is a fallacious statement.

She knows it is something that she doesn't know, but her emotions are so powerful in this area of her life, she refuses to accept her ignorance, and refuses to question whether or not her ideas based on nothing but feelings and emotions, could by any means possibly be wrong.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
^^ Yep, I hear you. Sometimes when I reach an impasse with such a person I'll let them have their definition until it breaks down on the next level when they try to build on it. Is this your current girlfriend?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
If I had to distill the OP down to its nub, here is what I would get.

Katie: You cannot know what you do not love.
Zaehet: You cannot love what you do not know.
cn
 

Zaehet Strife

Well-Known Member
^^ Yep, I hear you. Sometimes when I reach an impasse with such a person I'll let them have their definition until it breaks down on the next level when they try to build on it. Is this your current girlfriend?
Hell no! Lol!

Cn, im not sure if i understand that.

This is the point i'm trying to get across;

"We could be completely wrong, or right, when dealing with metaphysical ideas... so to say with certainty that our metaphysical ideas we have about the universe, reality and death, is certainly true... is certainly a lie."

She insists that she knows the truth, just like billions of others... just trying to point out the fact that there always exists the possibility that she COULD, be wrong.
 

Hepheastus420

Well-Known Member
It sounds like she's a typical spiritual person. She WANTS to believe there's more to life because she's not satisfied with her life now. She wants to believe we live in some mystical fairy world where she can believe her "self" is more than just a glimpse of life. And when you tell her your views are different and that she doesn't know for sure that anything she's saying is truth, she gets pissy because you're exposing reality to her. Once you did that, she tried discrediting your truth by saying it's just your opinion.

Pretty much she has a perception on life and doesn't appreciate you saying she might be wrong.. She lashed out because you stood a chance at changing the perception on life she has right now. It gives her comfort and you're stripping it away from her (sounds rude when I say it that way lol.. But it's not really that bad).
 

Hepheastus420

Well-Known Member
She reminds me of a indy girl.. They always want to make something seem like it's more "beautiful". They start using metaphors and more meaningful words to describe things.

Like lets say I see a nasty ass tire in some mud. And indy person would say something like "it's a piece of art.. It represents what the world has come down to, yet it displays a sense of beauty".. I'd be like STFU.

Yeah, that's ^^^ irrelevant to what you're asking lol.. Just wanted to share my opinion.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Hell no! Lol!

Cn, im not sure if i understand that.

This is the point i'm trying to get across;

"We could be completely wrong, or right, when dealing with metaphysical ideas... so to say with certainty that our metaphysical ideas we have about the universe, reality and death, is certainly true... is certainly a lie."

She insists that she knows the truth, just like billions of others... just trying to point out the fact that there always exists the possibility that she COULD, be wrong.
It's imo a collision of approaches to the well-led life.
She impresses me as an embracer, a unifier, a seeker of commonality and uninterested in pesky detail. We-are-all-one sort of huggy stuff.

You otoh seem more a divider, a characterizer, an analytical sort who can't accept something until you've reduced it to its components and tested each individually, and then checked their interoperation.

I took that impression and condensed it into those two statements. Was it valid? Idunno.
But (also jmo) the world needs both sorts to work well and cheerily. cn
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
From what I gathered, she's equating 'soul' with 'self', which seems to be a slippery sort of technique to get you to admit you believe in 'self' and, in her mind, by association 'soul'.

We've seen this same technique used by a few people here on the boards, and when we try to explain it's nothing but semantics, they usually tend to do the same thing, get upset that we're not understanding what they're saying.

To be honest, every time I read something like this, it makes me think they don't understand what they're trying to say..

You understand and accept we don't know and in fact can't know anything for absolute certainty. I'm not sure she does.

I had a tough time following what she was saying in the beginning about how beliefs aren't right nor wrong, they just ARE. This doesn't make any sense to me, is she saying that because there's no way to prove them for sure, so yours is just as good as mine, in the same way looking at art, the beauty is in the eye of the beholder? If so, this is confused reasoning, Sam Harris touches on this a bit in his work, there are measurable ways to determine what is good and what is bad without having to rely on known deceptive and false objective truths.

But I've had a couple of these same kinds of conversations with a couple people, the key and goal in your mind should always be to be understanding and reasonable. It looked like you kept saying the same thing in a few different ways and it was just frustrating her which caused her to lash out and dismiss the conversation.
 
Top