Doer
Well-Known Member
sheep don't feel controlled either i guess
if only you could ask them lol
Well see. I still thought we were talking about your brain cells.
sheep don't feel controlled either i guess
if only you could ask them lol
having a normal conversation with you is almost impossible, i really don't understand what you're saying
now it seems like you are saying they pay you 5k per gram, $5000 per gram
i am lost
please do the math for me math i do understand, your English not so well lol
so cops take away your pot, they then buy it back for 5k per pound , is that a good rate ?
Hey, a fixed rate of, what is that, 3000 quid? Regardless of quality. I'd say....pretty good in the current market.
this democracy things is beyond you isnt it
why do you still feel the need to make these snide little comments
i find it hard to understand what you are saying/typing sometimes
do you still feel animosity towards me , or am i making the wrong assumption, are you rude and snappy with everyone lol ?
i dont believe you . . i asked straight forward questions you purposely responded to a edit comment and not the content of the post . . .. you made a choice to do that...you are not fooling anyone . . .
fooling no one ?
again this is not a show or battle, it is irreverent what others think
you came here to fight with me because you have a personal gripe with me
that much of i am certain, i have never spoken to you before
i still think you are upset about your buddy gudkarma, it is the only thing that would explain your persistence
since we do not know each other
typing is not something you seem to find easy
why are you putting yourself through all this pain ?
spit it out, you will feel better
now again another fallacy
your cuurent fallacy assertion is that i must have an issue with you in order to have a dissenting opinion due to my standing up for another members as you interacted with them keep it up . . .
i dont have an issue with you . . but im sure you will ignore what i say . . which is your catch 22, you ask me for my candid opinion then you will accuse me of lying when i give it if it doesn't fit into what you think i should say.....so why even ask
its a game i see probably more then you
finshaggy is better at it though
list and number your questions coherently and ill see what i can do
why have you not answered the questions i have asked
and i do not believe you, you act like a typical troll who is butt hurt about something
fire goes for 2.5k a p here at single prices . . . i never said LE were fair to market value
more assumptions . .from the chum . . . .P
no its not up to me to do your work for you
no its not up to me to do your work for you
i have answered every question you have asked completely and wholeheartedly
thats how this started
if you are unable to be apart of the conversation , maybe you shoudl just bow out, its very simple to go back and read but if you are unwillgin to do so , then ya i guess i won since you cant compete
On a serious note. i have had pot taken away at gunpoint, twice.
So, you have blades at hand. I had a bloody blade fight erupt almost next to me at a bar in Piccalilli, in the middle of the afternoon. Don't you use them every time a copper looks crossly? So, that's why, bloody, is such a curse.
It's only Tues. Why you sound so drunk?
In Self Rule, 99.99% of us submit to all kinds of indignities. We have Laws and guns, lawyers and money.
And the only times I have ever had pot taken was at the point of a gun.
So, I'm not sure of the argument you want to bait me into. More Hints? People with guns take pot. What am I missing here?
Not dying in a hail of gunfire? That simply didn't occur to me.
One pound avoirdupois is four hundred fifty-three point six grams. cn
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/trial-obama-admins-greatest-shame?page=0,1The US still jails thousands of African Americans on sentences it admits were unfair. This was a moment almost unique in history: when a supposedly free society admitted that many of its citizens remain in prison for no good reason.
Strangely, the Obama administration initially urged in federal courts across the country that the old discriminatory penalties should still be applied to those arrested but not yet sentenced at the time the law was passed. However, the administration reversed course after significant criticism, and the US supreme court held last year that the new, more "fair" sentences must be applied to those not yet sentenced.
But that case did not decide the fate of any of the thousands of people already sitting in prison because of what all agree is an unfair law. For those people – sentenced, in some cases, just days or weeks before the Fair Sentencing Act was signed – our society's acknowledgment that they remain in prison for no good reason may not help them at all – because the government did not care to reduce their penalties retroactively when it declared them unjust.