What was that about Palin's wardrobe??

ViRedd

New Member
First Lady Michelle Obama steps out in Lanvin sneakers and they're only $540!

BY Amy Diluna
DAILY NEWS FASHION EDITOR

Friday, May 1st 2009, 3:22 PM
Morigi/Getty
Michelle Obama and Jill Biden (center) at a Feeding America event. The First Lady could feed quite a few people with what she paid for thesneakers she's wearing.

Ernst/Reuters
The kicks, made by high-end French fashion label Lanvin, cost $540.

Michelle Obama has taken casual to a haute new level.





While volunteering Wednesday at a D.C. food bank, the First Lady sported her usual J.Crew cardigan, a pair of utilitarian capri pants and, on her feet, a sneaky splurge: trainers that go for $540.

That's right: These sneakers - suede, with grosgrain ribbon laces and metallic pink toe caps - are made by French design house Lanvin, one of fashion's hottest labels. They come in denim and satin versions, and have been a brisk seller all spring.

They're out of stock at posh Meatpacking District boutique Jeffrey, and Barneys New York boasts a limited selection of the sneaks, which are a cult favorite among fashionistas.

It's likely Michelle got hers through Ikram, the Chicago retailer that often outfits her.

"They're shoes," the First Lady's reps sniffed when curious reporters inquired about the fancy footwear.

Michelle has stepped out in Lanvin before while getting down to business. A week ago, she shoveled dirt at a tree planting while wearing the line's chiffon tank.

Dresses and strappy pumps cost upward of $1,500, while tops go for $400 to $1,000.

Other celebrity fans of Lanvin's costly kicks include Ellen DeGeneres and Kanye West, who has blogged about his faves.

As the family's primary dog walker, Michelle clearly requires comfortable footwear.

"I got up at 5:15 in the morning to walk my puppy," she joked Thursday. "That's how my day starts. Even though the kids are supposed to do a lot of the work, I'm still up at 5:15 a.m. taking my dog out."

She'll be trodding on New York's sidewalks Tuesday for the first time as First Lady. Michelle will meet with staff at the U.S. mission to the United Nations. Later, she headlines Time magazine's "100 most influential people" gala.

 

ViRedd

New Member
What ... no outrage from the leftists in the forum? I thought you guys were the fashion police. :lol:

Vi
 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member
thought the difference from Palin is that Palin used campaign money.


you said yourself that Mrs Obama paid for the sneaks herself, no?
 

ViRedd

New Member
Palin "paid" for the clothes from campaign money? On the contrary ... the Republican National Committee "rented" the clothes Palin wore throughout the campaign.

With that said, the Left was outraged by Palin's wardrobe because it was "way to expensive" and "elitist." Nothing elitist about a $540 pair of tennis shoes though ... as long as the wife of a Democrat "common man" is wearing them, right? :lol:

Vi
 

Zig Zag Zane

Well-Known Member
ViRedd, Im sorry, but this is gonna go nowhere, and who the fuck cares about her sneakers? 12 year olds are walkin around in $600 shoes...Im sure your a rational person bro, so realize this sounds like one of those very desperate and retarted right wing arguments. Yes democrats got on Palin for that wardrobe thing, and that was dumb too, but Conservatives are jumpin on anything these days, and you shouldn't follow. Trust me, the republicans have contradicted themselves WAYYYYY more than dems.
 

TheHighClub

Active Member
ViRedd, Im sorry, but this is gonna go nowhere, and who the fuck cares about her sneakers? 12 year olds are walkin around in $600 shoes...Im sure your a rational person bro, so realize this sounds like one of those very desperate and retarted right wing arguments. Yes democrats got on Palin for that wardrobe thing, and that was dumb too, but Conservatives are jumpin on anything these days, and you shouldn't follow. Trust me, the republicans have contradicted themselves WAYYYYY more than dems.
well why dont you be specific about that last part and for democrats to have made such a big deal about wanting to take the white house from the big oil executives and wealthy and giving it all back to the working class man and the average joe, it really doesnt help the obamas image for michelle obama to play fashion queen in recession time when people are homeless and starving, actually its like a slap in the face, like she is saying we won and their is nothing you can do about it
 

LoudBlunts

Well-Known Member
didnt know looking nice and presentable was a crime


repukes are funny.


how you gonna tell someone else how to spend THEIR money.... sounds hypocritical if ya ask me
 

Zig Zag Zane

Well-Known Member
OMG everyone in the WHITE HOUSE wears expensive shit!You expect the first lady to dress like a bum??heres 1 example for you high club, republicans have demonized Obama for wanting to raise taxes, when multiple presidents including republican ones have raised taxes in the past...the right wing uses certain arguments only when its convenient. Anyways Im done on this thread because it seems to always get to heated when politics is the topic, the republicans are a dying breed, and they're going out like sore losers, bringing up shit from the campaign???come on now....
 

andy appleseed

Well-Known Member
Who the fuck cares? I don't....If the liberals are going to bitch about and attack Governor Palin's wardrobe, why are they not bitching about Mrs Obama's $400 tennis shoes????
Becuse that is what the "DRIVE BY MEDIA" DOES!!!

FOX news and conservitive talk radio fucking DOMINATE the rattings over the drive bys.

Fuck the federal government!! we need less of it!!
 

TheHighClub

Active Member
didnt know looking nice and presentable was a crime


repukes are funny.


how you gonna tell someone else how to spend THEIR money.... sounds hypocritical if ya ask me

the president and first lady are supposed to represent the people and when the people are in a recession it is discouraging to see people suffering when our first lady is sportin $600 kicks I mean sure if she was at some formal high society event where you have to dress up wearing expensive dress shoes ok whatever, but were talkin 600 dollar tennis shoes, it just doesnt help gain support I mean as a republican If I saw obama or michelle suck it up and set the example for other wealthy people by cutting costs on extravagant things and giving to the less fortunate, there would be one thing about the obamas i support
 

TheHighClub

Active Member
And let me stress that its all about public appearance, PUBLIC APPEARANCE, mrs obama can wear 5000 underwear to bed as long as nobody knows about it soo its not about how they spend their money because thats their right. Its about coming out in 600 sneakers when most people cant. like rubbing it in saying Im rich and your not soo sucks to be you
 

Zig Zag Zane

Well-Known Member
Look, 12 year old kids are walking around wearing $500-$600 pairs of nike sbs and shit, The first lady wearing those expensive shoes didnt contribute to the fucked up economy, this is just dumb!
 

andy appleseed

Well-Known Member
And let me stress that its all about public appearance, PUBLIC APPEARANCE, mrs obama can wear 5000 underwear to bed as long as nobody knows about it soo its not about how they spend their money because thats their right. Its about coming out in 600 sneakers when most people cant. like rubbing it in saying Im rich and your not soo sucks to be you

Your wrong HighClub...its not rubbing it in because you bought something nice with YOUR money that you worked for (granted it might be stupid).

It is wrong to tell the public that you understand where their coming from and get elected by strategically appealing to the lower and middle class and then go off and wear fucking $400 shoes.

Screw the federal government! Screw Republicans! Double fist ass fuck Democrats!
 

ViRedd

New Member
Hahaha!! OK, so some of you libs bit on the argument. Good for you!

And as long as we're on the hypocrisy of the Left ... We all know where you libs stood prior to the election regarding Bush/Cheney and Haliburton, right? Well, how about the Obama administration and their butt-boys the unions? Let's see now ... 21,000 GM employees are being laid off ... and the union ends up owning 51% of the auto companies. See any conflict of interest there, libbies?? :lol:

Vi

PS: And by the way, lest any of your libbies are pegging me as a Republican, I can assure you that I am not. I'm a conservative.
 
Top