How bad does the DNC suck? This Bad

[UncleBuck]

The DCCC is obviously influencing the election by showing support and financially backing one candidate

what did you think their function was

 

[UncleBuck]

When these people actually get perp walked out of their offices I'll cheer. So far, it's American corruption as usual.

why do you address a murdering dictator as "mr putin" but refer to the democratic nominee for president as "shillary"

 

[ttystikk]

You aren't a progressive. You are an idealistic liberal just like Bernie. Bernie hasn't gotten anything done in 12 years as a Senator.

Do you call Jerry Brown a progressive? I do. He's nothing like Bernie and his cult. Jerry has done a fabulous job for California. I'd most certainly call him a liberal progressive. He too didn't support that ludicrous unfinished, unfunded health care bill that you so ardently wanted last year. That piece of shit legislation would have been the downfall of the Democratic Party in California too.

Damn right the DCCC are putting their support behind Democratic candidates they think can win. But they aren't choosing them, the voters will when they go to the polls. If the candidates that you like are so good then they will win. No excuses. Those are for losers.

It's amazing how much time, effort and column inches you spending bashing Bernie instead of championing someone- anyone- else.

In fact, it's downright suspicious.

It's evidence that you know who actually has the ideological initiative but you can't bring yourself to admit it.

So keep bashing without offering any solutions or candidates- and as long as you do, people like @Padawanbater2 and I will keep pointing out how flawed you and the establishment party are.

 

[Padawanbater2]

We have this thing called an election. People campaign to win people's votes.

The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing that

 

[ttystikk]

i don;t blame the democrats for not supporting candidates that you want, you're a bigot that calls people "fa***ots"

Derp.

Useless argument from a useless argumentarian.

 

[ttystikk]

The DCCC are putting their support behind Democratic candidates... but they aren't choosing them... the voters will...





How are the voters choosing the candidate legitimately when the DCCC is putting their support behind them?

The DCCC is obviously influencing the election by showing support and financially backing one candidate over another

The more people we tell about this, the less effective the tactic will be, no matter how much they spend on it.

 

[ttystikk]

We have this thing called an election. People campaign to win people's votes. If you progressives can't win the primary how can you possibly expect to win in November against real opposition.

Right. It's okay to rig the primary and then turn around and say that's evidence of anything but Democratic Party corruption.

Can you say hypocrite?

 

[ttystikk]

why do you address a murdering dictator as "mr putin" but refer to the democratic nominee for president as "shillary"

Oh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.

You do this a lot- you do it even more when you're losing the argument.

Sad!

 

[UncleBuck]

Derp.

Useless argument from a useless argumentarian.

you're just defending the guy that clls people "fa***ots" because you call people "fa***ots" too

no wonder we don't follow you guys into political inviability

you bigoted assholes suck

 

[ttystikk]

The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing that

That's because they actually think it's acceptable behavior.

Then they wonder why the party lacks credibility.

 

[Justin-case]

Oh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.

You do this a lot- you do it even more when you're losing the argument.

Sad!

It's a fair question

 

[Fogdog]

The Democratic establishment is trying to influence the election before the American people have the chance to elect the candidate of their choice. You're purposefully ignoring addressing that

that's your spin. From what I see, the DCCC is channeling legal contributions to candidates they think are most likely to win. From what I see, Our Revolution isn't doing a good job of winning seats. They are 2 for 17 this year.

If your sorry ass candidates can't scrape up enough money to fight and win the primary then they can just go home.

 

[UncleBuck]

Oh look, yet another distraction masquerading as an debating point.

You do this a lot- you do it even more when you're losing the argument.

Sad!

just find it unsettling that you would address a murdering dictator respectfully but not the first woman ever to be nominated for the presidency of the united states

 

[ttystikk]

It's a fair question

No it isn't.

Mr Putin is the duly elected leader of Russia.

Shillary is a corporate hack and not in office.

 

[UncleBuck]

The more people we tell about this, the less effective the tactic will be, no matter how much they spend on it.

so your strategy is to be even more annoying, whiny, preachy, and spammy

 

[ttystikk]

that's your spin. From what I see, the DCCC is channeling legal contributions to candidates they think are most likely to win. From what I see, Our Revolution isn't doing a good job of winning seats. They are 2 for 17 this year.

If your sorry ass candidates can't scrape up enough money to fight and win the primary then they can just go home.

Right. More circular logic in the banal attempt to legitimise blatant corruption.

 

[Fogdog]

It's amazing how much time, effort and column inches you spending bashing Bernie instead of championing someone- anyone- else.

In fact, it's downright suspicious.

It's evidence that you know who actually has the ideological initiative but you can't bring yourself to admit it.

So keep bashing without offering any solutions or candidates- and as long as you do, people like @Padawanbater2 and I will keep pointing out how flawed you and the establishment party are.

I'm happy with you thinking I don't want Bernie as president. That just might be true.

 

[ttystikk]

so your strategy is to be even more annoying, whiny, preachy, and spammy

I know, you really can't stand it when we're right.

 

[Fogdog]

Right. More circular logic in the banal attempt to legitimise blatant corruption.

If your sorry ass candidates can't run a competitive campaign during the primary, they deserve to lose. That's the way it is. Suck it up, buttercup.

 

[ttystikk]

I'm happy with you thinking I don't want Bernie as president. That just might be true.

You spend all your time bashing him.

If you actually like the idea of him leading the country, you sure don't act like it.

Yet more hypocrisy?