Yet another Obama lawless action...

[UncleBuck]

Thank you for proving my point. Sometimes you're alright Meathead.

you're a racist pedophile.

 

[see4]

Classic Fail Thread. Congrats.

 

[Rob Roy]

you're a racist pedophile.

Why do you beat your wife?

 

[UncleBuck]

Why do you beat your wife?

so are you denying that you advocate for the ability to turn customers away based on race, a position the KKK advocates for, and constantly describe pedophilia as voluntary and consensual, just like NAMBLA does?

you are a sick racist pedophile. own it, sicko.

 

[Rob Roy]

so are you denying that you advocate for the ability to turn customers away based on race, a position the KKK advocates for, and constantly describe pedophilia as voluntary and consensual, just like NAMBLA does?

you are a sick racist pedophile fuck. own it, sicko.

No, I advocate that government not determine how people live, use their OWN property, their OWN body and forcibly determine others personal, business and marital etc, relations for them.

What people do with their freedom is up to them.

Are you advocating that people use force to make people interact with them just like rapists, slave owners and child molesters do?

 

[UncleBuck]

No, I advocate that government not determine how people live, use their OWN property, their OWN body and forcibly determine others personal, business and marital etc, relations for them.

done and done. no one can make you open a business that is open to the public instead of private, or make you marry your gay son, who you think should die of AIDS for being gay.

Are you advocating that people use force to make people interact with them just like rapists, slave owners and child molesters do?

no, i'm pointing out that what you advocate for is the same thing the KKK and NAMBLA advocates for.

that kinda makes you a racist pedophile, now doesn't it?

 

[UncleBuck]

No, it doesn't.

so why do you get to espouse racial segregation and pedophilia yet be exempt from the label of racist pedophile?

are you a special little flower?

 

[Rob Roy]

so why do you get to espouse racial segregation and pedophilia yet be exempt from the label of racist pedophile?

are you a special little flower?

I don't espouse racial segregation. I think nobody should be forced to be separate or made to be together. The involved parties should make that decision and if the choice isn't mutual, people should leave each other alone.

So why do you get to champion forced human interactions and be exempt from comparisons of your tactics to a rapist?

 

[UncleBuck]

I don't espouse racial segregation.

what about your stance that it should be legal to kick people out of stores based on skin color, klanman?

I think nobody should be forced to be separate or made to be together.

So why do you get to champion forced human interactions and be exempt from comparisons of your tactics to a rapist?

so you finally found a store that was forced to be open to the public?

 

[Rob Roy]

what about your stance that it should be legal to kick people out of stores based on skin color, klanman?



so you finally found a store that was forced to be open to the public?

It should be legal for a person to shit on the floor of their own house. That doesn't mean I advocate that people do it. Two separate things Poopy Pants.

 

[UncleBuck]

It should be legal for a person to shit on the floor of their own house. That doesn't mean I advocate that people do it. Two separate things Poopy Pants.

you constantly advocate for racial segregaion in the form of kicking people out of stores based on skin color.

the KKK loves you for this, pedo.

 

[Rob Roy]

you constantly advocate for racial segregaion in the form of kicking people out of stores based on skin color.

the KKK loves you for this, pedo.

I constantly advocate for people to be able to make their own choices and have the ability to engage in consensual, not forced, human relations.

You constantly advocate that some people can make others interact with them, using non defensive force to achieve it.

You also like to figuratively gobble the schlong of the nanny state. You should come up for air now and then Poopy Pants.

 

[UncleBuck]

I constantly advocate for people to be able to make their own choices and have the ability to engage in consensual, not forced, human relations.

that already exists. people can open a public or a private store. their choice.

You constantly advocate that some people can make others interact with them, using non defensive force to achieve it.

You also like to figuratively gobble the schlong of the nanny state. You should come up for air now and then Poopy Pants.

nope. i state that everyone is free to open a public or private store, because they are.

the KKK loves it when you try to push for racial segregation.

 

[Rob Roy]

that already exists. people can open a public or a private store. their choice.



nope. i state that everyone is free to open a public or private store, because they are.

the KKK loves it when you try to push for racial segregation.

I've never pushed for racial segregation in my life. I've never pushed for racial integration. To do so, would be to view people of a given race as you do, like a collectivist. I view people as individuals, all endowed with the right to decide how to conduct their own lives, but not the lives of others. People should not be prevented from associating with, or forced to associate with anyone, by you, me or the giant schlong of the state.

What is property and who can own it?

 

[UncleBuck]

I've never pushed for racial segregation in my life.

then how would you characterize your view that it should be perfectly legal to kick people out of stores based on race alone?

People should not be forced to associate

who are you forced to associate with, even as someone who does not own a store?

why are you so passionate that those who own stores should be allowed to "not associate" with people based on race alone? they already have that right, ya know.

What is property and who can own it?

a store is a type of property and anyone may own one.

and if that person wishes to live in your world, where skin color is so important that they must deny people service on that basis alone, that person is perfectly free to call it a private store. it's their property after all, so they ar free to make that choice.

but the overwhelming majority of people who own property choose not to do that. the free market has spoken.

your form of racial segregation loses again.

go ask rawn pawl for more talking points.

 

[Rob Roy]

then how would you characterize your view that it should be perfectly legal to kick people out of stores based on race alone?



who are you forced to associate with, even as someone who does not own a store?

why are you so passionate that those who own stores should be allowed to "not associate" with people based on race alone? they already have that right, ya know.



a store is a type of property and anyone may own one.

and if that person wishes to live in your world, where skin color is so important that they must deny people service on that basis alone, that person is perfectly free to call it a private store. it's their property after all, so they ar free to make that choice.

but the overwhelming majority of people who own property choose not to do that. the free market has spoken.

your form of racial segregation loses again.

go ask rawn pawl for more talking points.

It's pretty simple, simpleton. None of us own other people or their property or have the right to make them associate or not associate. That's their call, not ours.

Laws that forced people to associate when one party didn't want to ? Hmmm....isn't that the means slavery was based on?

Don't start with the free market stuff either, you are helplessly lost in any discussion of a free market like a floater turd that won't go down the toilet no matter how many times you flush.

 

[UncleBuck]

Laws that forced people to associate when one party didn't want to ? Hmmm....isn't that the means slavery was based on?

there is no law that "forces people to associate". you dumb fuck. people can make their businesses private.

so your slavery comparison is inappropriate, because slaves could not choose to "not associate", unlike store owners. that is very insulting to descendents of slaves, but a klanman like you doesn't mind being offensive to blacks in that way.

because you are a klanman who hates blacks.

the free market has spoken, klanman. businesses overwhelmingly choose to be open to the public rather than private.

your brand of racism loses.

and you're a pedophile too.

 

[Rob Roy]

there is no law that "forces people to associate". you dumb fuck. people can make their businesses private.

so your slavery comparison is inappropriate, because slaves could not choose to "not associate", unlike store owners. that is very insulting to descendents of slaves, but a klanman like you doesn't mind being offensive to blacks in that way.

because you are a klanman who hates blacks.

the free market has spoken, klanman. businesses overwhelmingly choose to be open to the public rather than private.

your brand of racism loses.

and you're a pedophile too.

If slaves could not choose to "not associate", then please explain how people that own private property can choose to "not associate" with the entity that forces them to make a declaration of their property.

Hint - You are blind to the automatic inclusion of your omnipresent nanny state....dolt.

 

[UncleBuck]

If slaves could not choose to "not associate", then please explain how people that own private property can choose to "not associate"

by calling it a private business, klanman.

You are blind to the automatic inclusion of your omnipresent nanny state....dolt.

that nanny state only had to intervene after segregationists like you caused too much harm. it was not automatic nor omnipresent, it was a reaction to your hateful and harmful racist practices.

clearly, you are blind to the harm your racist hatred causes.

 

[Rob Roy]

by calling it a private business, klanman.



that nanny state only had to intervene after segregationists like you caused too much harm. it was not automatic nor omnipresent, it was a reaction to your hateful and harmful racist practices.

clearly, you are blind to the harm your racist hatred causes.

All business engaged in by private people is ALREADY private though. It is between the engaged parties, not you, me or the nanny state.

I don't have racist hatred. I'm probably about the most peaceful person you'd ever meet, not that I'd invite you into my home, based on your history of callous treatment of others property.


You can't cause a person an actionable harm, by disassociating with them. You CAN create an actionable harm by forcing them to associate with you though.

The only kind of segregation I advocate is one where the individual makes choices about their own body and their own property, I do not hold a collectivist view like you do, it is hypocritical and stifles individual freedom.