10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Don't Understand

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Does this sound familiar to anyone arguing with the left on rollitup.
But for the few liberals on this forum who will actually engage in discussion on the issues and facts, John Hawkins nailed it.




1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?

2) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don't belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can't be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
3) Fairness: In all fairness, I must admit that fairness is an arbitrary concept. So, you could make the argument that no one could get "fairness" wrong. Still, liberals do because they don't make any effort to actually "be fair." As a practical matter, liberals define "fairness" as taking as much as possible from people who they don't think are going to vote for them and giving it to people who may vote for them in return for their ill gotten largesse. Certainly conservatives, libertarians, and moderates might disagree about how much money to take from the wealthy to redistribute to the poor or how to help the disadvantaged, but the only liberal answer to the question, "How much is enough?" is "more."
4) Greed: To a liberal, believing that you pay too much in taxes or even opposing paying more in taxes is greedy. In actuality, wanting to loot as much money as possible that someone else has earned to use for your own purposes, which is what liberals do, is a much better example of greed.
5) Hate: Liberals often define simple disagreement with them on issues like gay marriage, tax rates, or abortion as hatred. No matter how well a position is explained, or the logical underpinnings behind it, it's chalked up to hate. Meanwhile, the angriest, most vicious, most hateful people in all of politics are liberals railing against what they say is "hatred." This irony is completely lost on the Left.
6) Investment: Actual investments involve putting money or resources into a project in hopes that they will appreciate in value. Liberals skip the second half of that equation. To them, an "investment" is taking someone else's tax dollars and putting it into a project that liberals approve of and whether a profit is made or lost is so irrelevant that they typically don't even bother to measure the results.

7) Charity: Contributing your own money or time to a good cause is charity. Liberals view themselves as charitable if they take someone else's tax dollars and give it away to people they hope will vote for them in return. At a minimum, they should at least credit the taxpayers who paid for the money they gave away for the charity, although it's not really charity if it's involuntary. Of course, there's nothing charitable about asking someone else to sacrifice for your gain, which could actually be better described as selfish.

8) Patriotism: Liberals love America the way a wife beater loves his spouse. That's why they're always beating up the country "for its own good." Doesn't the country understand that liberals have to hit it in the mouth because they LOVE IT SO MUCH?!?!? Of course, the conventional definition of patriotism, which is loving your country and wishing it well, isn't one that liberals can wrap their heads around.
9) Tolerance: In a free, open, and pluralistic society, there are all sorts of behaviors that we may have to tolerate, even though we don't approve of those activities. Liberals don't get this distinction. For one thing, they don't understand the difference between tolerance and acceptance. They also don't extend any of the tolerance they're agitating for to people who disagree with them. Liberals silence people who disagree with them at every opportunity which is, dare we say it, an extremely intolerant way to behave.
10) Diversity: What liberals mean by "diversity" is that they want a broad range of people from different races, colors, and creeds who have identical political views. A black or Hispanic conservative doesn't contribute to "diversity" in liberal eyes because he actually has diverse views. Incredible role models for women like Sarah Palin can't be feminists to liberals because she doesn't share the same liberal beliefs as sexist pigs like Anthony Weiner and Bill Maher. How can you have any meaningful "diversity" when everyone has to think the same way?
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
You just don't agree with anyone who is intelligent. That's your problem, and no one else.

Intelligent people embrace change, and you can't handle it.

Man up, and admit that you just don't get it.

:mrgreen:
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
You just don't agree with anyone who is intelligent. That's your problem, and no one else.

Intelligent people embrace change, and you can't handle it.

Man up, and admit that you just don't get it.

:mrgreen:
Are you making the case that change is always good?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
You just don't agree with anyone who is intelligent. That's your problem, and no one else.

Intelligent people embrace change, and you can't handle it.

Man up, and admit that you just don't get it.

:mrgreen:
Don't have to be intelligent to be a republican. You just need the ability to let other people form your opinions for you.
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Don't have to be intelligent to be a republican. You just need the ability to let other people form your opinions for you.
1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?
Racism is bad.
You don't agree with me?
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?
Being open minded means listening to ideas, not necessarily accepting them.

Being close minded means not listening to ideas, (typically religions, for example, do not listen to new ideas).

There's a big difference.
 

travisw

Well-Known Member
But for the few liberals on this forum who will actually engage in discussion on the issues and facts
If everything you posted wasn't so hyper-partisan, I'm sure more people would happily discuss current events with you. As it stands, many of us feel, we have beenthere ​before.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
It's awesome when several of the dumbest libs on RIU start preaching about intelligence.

Baaaaaa-Baaaaaa
 

JohnnySocko

Active Member
) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don't belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can't be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.
still one must distinguish between racial bias (of Sharpton/Jackson/NAACP type stuff) bigotry (Jesse Helms-isms), hate (Coulter, et) and outright Nazi-ish racial superiority (the type of shit that put people in gas chambers and allowed thousands of Native Americans to be slaughtered and blacks to be enslaved and lynched)

...every race/people has thier turn at being inhumane, and NO race has a patent on it...
unfortunatley white people, expansion and guns sorta happened before TV and all this right wing/left wing bullshit happened simultaneously with mass media....\

I'd bet a zillion if TV had been invented while the "west was won" and images of dead Indian villages, piles of buffalo & passenger pigeon carcasses and boat loads of dead slaves being thrown into the Atlantic, well lets just say Limbaugh and Co wouldn't be preaching half their bullshit....
 

spazatak

Well-Known Member
You just don't agree with anyone who is intelligent. That's your problem, and no one else.

Intelligent people embrace change, and you can't handle it.

Man up, and admit that you just don't get it.

:mrgreen:
I dont fear change... I fear the things that dont change....Chico Buarque
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
the nazis didn't think civil rights were a good idea either.
Its just funny how you tote that line.
Civil rights you say? Emancipation from the liberal plantation is all about INDIVIDUAL rights.
But you go ahead and preach the civil gospel there buck.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Its just funny how you tote that line.
Civil rights you say? Emancipation from the liberal plantation is all about INDIVIDUAL rights.
But you go ahead and preach the civil gospel there buck.
Freedom of religion does not grant the right to build a mosque.
 
Top