Why Did Bush Knock Down The Towers?

this is just coming out now. in lieu of all the anti war support. when we went in all evidence led to saddam being linked.get a grip stop arguing for the sake of arguing. we broke no laws we have proof we didnt bomb our own country geeze.
 
While the government may not have been linked, there are definitely al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq, not to mention one of their top leaders we killed in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
 
The government purposefully exxageratted, cherry picked, and even completeyly fabricated information leading up to the invasion...this is a fact, even all the msm acknowledges this....un charter is a treaty, according to our constitution treaties are law, we broke charter so we broke the law period
 
I never really put much stock into the whole explosives in the tower thing, but that movie didnt really explain much in my eyes, they just said the exact same explaination they originally gave which is it fell due to fire damage....meaning this is the first highrise in history to collapse from fire damage...architect was on crack maybe? It even says at the end of the movie..." a conclusion not likely to satisfy conspiracy theorists"
 
Wow... I'm so glad I found this sketch. Good laugh.


conspiracy_theories.png
 
I never really put much stock into the whole explosives in the tower thing, but that movie didnt really explain much in my eyes, they just said the exact same explaination they originally gave which is it fell due to fire damage....meaning this is the first highrise in history to collapse from fire damage...architect was on crack maybe? It even says at the end of the movie..." a conclusion not likely to satisfy conspiracy theorists"


Well, take a looksie... lots of buildings have fallen due to fire.

madridremainsae6.jpg
 
like I said I never put much stock into the demolitions thing, although it is pretty perplexing....but just to play devils advocate that building didnt completely collapse and it was obviously completely engulfed in flames and was probably burning for a very long period of time. Do you know what building that is and how long it burned for?
 
I do believe terrorist's did the attack, Bush let them. We had intelligence that said they were going to do this, we ignored it. Thats funny because of how many civil libertys are being taken away to detect terroism when the system in place already had done that.


The real reason we were attacked is because of the CIA, the CIA had been waging war for 40 years vs 3ed world countrys. This video claims 6million dead over the 40 years, but it's actually closer to 20million.

YouTube - John Stockwell: The Third World War
 
ok so somebody out there has to agree that it is more likely that
nazis did it than bush & co.
?
they don't have the imagination...
 
south africas national party did it?
in cahoots with others no doubt,
just a hunch based on what i said earlier in the thread, and validated with a graph,
and that would be
German and Saxon colonials.

as well as


tarantatarahhhhhhh!!!!!!!


did u think all the nazis neatly surrended in '45?

Nazi hunter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

60 Years after Auschwitz: The Twilight of the Nazi Hunter - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News

BBC NEWS | World | Americas | Is the net tightening on Nazi 'Dr Death'?

AAAKK
 
Homegrown, meet the fruit loop...fruit loop, meet homegrown. Everyone is a Nazi, and Hitler's shining shoes for a dime a pop in Zimbabwe.;-)
 
... and wikipedia are the archetypal conspiracy theorists ...

... and stoney has a big nose ...
(thats why u she only shows her eyes and mouth)
(and boy does she have a big mouth)
 
Uhhh...no..because its dumb to show your whole face on a pot site, you dick.Speaking of dicks, too bad yours gets about as erect as a wet dishrag.
... and wikipedia are the archetypal conspiracy theorists ...

... and stoney has a big nose ...
(thats why u she only shows her eyes and mouth)
(and boy does she have a big mouth)
 
Back
Top