Where is the Anti-War Movement in the Age of Obama?

Why do all of the Bush haters love Obama so much when Obama has just as much blood on his hands as Bush?
The Bush haters also loved Kerry who said that he'd 'smoke the terrorists out of their caves'?

Obama is a murderous fuck just as much as Bush. And it just goes to show that the global agenda continues, independent of who is in the White House.

Wake up morons. Obama and the media have lulled you into a trance. Wake up and fight for what is right.

If you think it is right to continue to blow up little brown people, then fine, continue driving around with your Obama stickers on your car, right next to your 'war is not the answer' stickers.


http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/07/16/obamas-war-signals/

http://www.infowars.com/where-is-the-anti-war-movement-in-the-age-of-obama/

The Obama and McCain bots have been too busy complaining about what the MSM has been telling them to which is health care reform and "racists" who oppose it.

You think Obama wants to be known for losing Iraq or Afghanistan?

ever notice how the bombs, bullets and missiles are all shaped like dicks? it's a subconscious desire to thrust the penis into others' affairs. it's called...FUCKING WItH PEOPLE

and "pulling out" is not a manly thing to do...when you get in there, you fuck them good....fuck them to death

budsmoker87 said:

ever notice how the bombs, bullets and missiles are all shaped like dicks? it's a subconscious desire to thrust the penis into others' affairs. it's called...FUCKING WItH PEOPLE

and "pulling out" is not a manly thing to do...when you get in there, you fuck them good....fuck them to death

Click to expand...

Well put. I never thought of it that way.

I've seen the Code Pink nuts at a number of congressional hearings this year. It's not like they went into the woodwork when Obama took office. Frankly theirs have been the only real faces I've seen in the supposed anti-war movement over the last several years, except perhaps for Cindy Sheehan and some of our returning vets.

All you need to do is change the terms. It is no longer a war on terror. It is an overseas contingency operation now.

Lib's are more interested in perception of words than they are in action since Obama is really an extension of the Bush Doctrine when it comes to foreign policy.

They are no longer terrorists but combatants.... see how easy it is to win a war?

What is the end game of Afghanistan?
There aint one, it cant be won! we are fighting millions of people around the world!

nuera59 said:

What is the end game of Afghanistan?
There aint one, it cant be won! we are fighting millions of people around the world!

Click to expand...

This is the reason why Bush decided to hit Iraq instead of Afghanistan. Quite simply, the military felt that if Bush could suck Al Queda into fighting in Iraq, they could be defeated there as opposed to Afghan. It worked great and Al Queda was decimated in Iraq.

It was a stroke of genius....

So your saying we will win and we will be walking out with no future threat to our nations?

Iraq? There is always a chance of future problems..... that is why we spend so much on our military. America must always be vigilant and on guard. Nothing is guaranteed. That's life....

If im honest i cant see anygood coming out of war! I dont think this will end anytime soon, its just our boys & girls dying, innocents being killed, for a war on resources! I mean TERROR.

No one wants war except the aggressors. That's not the USA. So no worries.....

It would be great if nations didn't war....but let's face facts...humans are violent creatures, perhaps the most violent to ever walk the Planet.

This is not surprising since the earth is based on violence......

CrackerJax said:

No one wants war except the aggressors. That's not the USA. So no worries.....

It would be great if nations didn't war....but let's face facts...humans are violent creatures, perhaps the most violent to ever walk the Planet.

This is not surprising since the earth is based on violence......

Click to expand...

So who are the aggressors? IMO it's us.

Im sorry man but from where im sitting Usa & UK are the aggressors.
I live in the uk and id say the majority of people are now asking why are we still there?
I totally agree with you on saying its in our nature to destroy ourselves and everything around us!

I don't hear the liberals complaining about the cost of the war (s), now that O is in charge. It's hypocritical to say the least

Apparently the Democrats support the war now

Yes, spreading democracy and human rights around the world sure makes us aggressors. Championing human rights sure is NOT the way to go is it?

If this makes the USA an aggressor nation in your eyes.....that's your myopic vision, and you stand practically alone.

We are in their country! Aggressive or what.

Now let's be clear. The only sentiment that really counts is that of the Iraqis. The Iraqis are overwhelmingly joyful that someone finally stepped in and got rid of their oppressor. The reelection of the US backed govt. is a clear sign of that approval.

Sometimes you have to go in. It all goes back to tribal desires in the end. Saddam wanting to annex Kuwait (against the wishes of Kuwait) is what started the whole mess over there in the first place. This is simply where it ended up. A bloody war (mostly for Al Queda and its victims), a much more stable and representative govt. serving the needs of its ppl, and Saddam at the end of a rope. It was a process that could not have been accomplished without Saddam at the helm driving the course himself. He gambled, he lost. Now the ppl of Iraqi finally have a victory worth having.

Okay iraq is sorted, by what your saying, so why didnt we walk away then?
why are we in Afghanistan? To fight terrorism! I personally feel that its never going to go away.
Are we allies going to stay there till the end off time?
As for expense on war, the Uk seems like its sharing guns.