This is gonna get interesting! Militia takes over Ore. federal building after protest.

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
so the oregon rancher was shot nine times, including in the face. this would explain his hands being up in a surrender position and then "dancing and reaching around" in the video that the fbi produced. a stolen weapon was also found on the dead rancher.

could someone explain to me then why the fbi would even release the video--even without sound, now the nine bullet holes kind of says a lot? thanks.
Well prepared and good shooting would explain 9 bullet holes. Knowing cops records this probably means 350 shots were fired at him
 

undercovergrow

Well-Known Member
I am not sure how many times he was shot would explain why he was reaching for something inside his jacket. I am sure the video has been examined by.... Well, everyone since it is public.
to me it shows he was surrendering to the authorities "hands up, don't shoot" and his "reaching" for something would seem to be reaching for the stinging bullet holes riddled into his side, etc. so again, i am curious as to why the fbi would release this in the first place.

Well prepared and good shooting would explain 9 bullet holes. Knowing cops records this probably means 350 shots were fired at him
maybe the only thing that excluded the 350 shots were the well-prepared cops realized they were in each others cross fire.
 

Loudog419

Member
I see now why there's been some confusion about burning. That's because the Hammonds were caught illegally burning more than once. I quote from Wikipedia:

Dwight and Steve Hammond were convicted of arson in 2012 for setting fires on federal land adjacent to their property near Burns in 2001 and 2006.[8] Federal prosecutors said the first fire was set to conceal the site of an illegal deer hunt, while the second fire was an unauthorized backburn set on the slopes below a firefighting camp.[9] According to the Hammonds, they set the first fire to stop invasive plants from growing onto their grazing fields.[10]

The second fire was an "unauthorized" backburn. So I'm guessing no permit.

They should get a break because they didn't harm a real person or a real person's property?? In other words, people should be free to do whatever stupid thing they want as long as nobody got hurt that time?

You should go test that theory out. Try driving 90 mph down the freeway on the wrong side. As long as nobody's hurt or killed before the Staters pull you over, no problemo. You can tell them, "Let me go. I'm the victim here!"

Wait, wait, before you try that out, you're white, right? I wouldn't want anything to happen...
Who can find the reverse racism in this post?
 

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
I would say that rights actually do come from the government.

Just to make things a bit clearer lets step back from the human race. What rights does a monkey or chimpanzee have? What rights does a cow or dog have? What rights does a coyote have?

We know that god didnt give us our rights because god doesnt defend our rights for us.

What rights do you have outside of a society? Say you are out in a field surrounded by 3 hungry lions. What rights do you have?

The rights we have in America are actually rules that prevent the government from infringing upon certain things. The rest is free for government meddling. Therefore, we only have rights in America to protect us from government. If there was no government, what rights would you have?
You would have whatever rights the strongest group allowed you to have.
 

Loudog419

Member
You would have whatever rights the strongest group allowed you to have.
Clearly the strongest group is the government, therefore the three hungry lions must be the government. With that said, you have the rights allowed to you by the three hungry lions. Which like the government is very little.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
to me it shows he was surrendering to the authorities "hands up, don't shoot" and his "reaching" for something would seem to be reaching for the stinging bullet holes riddled into his side, etc. so again, i am curious as to why the fbi would release this in the first place.



maybe the only thing that excluded the 350 shots were the well-prepared cops realized they were in each others cross fire.
I am a bit nearsided and watched this just once on a computer monitor. HOWEVER....

Dont you think that people who have issues with the police have already enhanced and watched the video frame by frame? I mean, if there was any visible evidence that the police fired first dont you think there would already be video evidence on the internet showing such?

The cops were faced with possibly 3 armed suspects and I am not sure if the victim was the driver but I think he was left passenger side. Anyway, if you watch the video the car almost hits a trooper on the left side of the road block.

There are bad cops and bad shootings but this does not seem like one of them.
 

Loudog419

Member
it's racist to acknowledge that blacks are far more likely to be the victims of police brutality?

boy, you're a thin skinned little prick.
Yes exactly. Perfect example actually. What facts do you have to back that up? From what I see, the cops suck no matter who you are. Police abuse there power everyday to all walks of life. How about instead of black lives matter we have all lives matter.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes exactly. Perfect example actually. What facts do you have to back that up?
are you really this dumb?



How about instead of black lives matter we have all lives matter.
that's like a boss promising all of his workers equal pay for equal work, then giving the black employees 50% of what he paid his white employees on payday. then, when the black workers point this out and state that their paychecks matter, the boss turns around and says "hey, all paychecks matter".

so just shut up and stop proving what i already know about you.
 

Loudog419

Member
are you really this dumb?





that's like a boss promising all of his workers equal pay for equal work, then giving the black employees 50% of what he paid his white employees on payday. then, when the black workers point this out and state that their paychecks matter, the boss turns around and says "hey, all paychecks matter".

so just shut up and stop proving what i already know about you.
That chart you made on your PowerPoint don't mean shit to me. Cool paycheck story bro keep complaining and whining about all the injustice, good luck. Hey maybe try a different country if you don't like it, or my point. Police abuse everyone white black or Hispanic, which is all that chart that YOU clearly made, seem to think exist on this world. What about Asians bro? That chart BTW is another great example of reverse racism. Next.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That chart you made on your PowerPoint ...that chart that YOU clearly made
i guess you are too dumb (aka white) to notice the citation at the bottom which states that those statistics were compiled by the CDC.

dumb white people like you make smart white people like me look dumb. stop making white people look dumb, dumbass.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
That chart you made on your PowerPoint don't mean shit to me. Cool paycheck story bro keep complaining and whining about all the injustice, good luck. Hey maybe try a different country if you don't like it, or my point. Police abuse everyone white black or Hispanic, which is all that chart that YOU clearly made, seem to think exist on this world. What about Asians bro? That chart BTW is another great example of reverse racism. Next.
what? Is it the voices in your head keeping you from reading this? I mean, umm, longer bar means more police violence on that grouping.

Reverse racism? Where in hell did you get that out of this graphic? Is it maybe that you like to get beat and are upset black people get more than you? If so, speak for yourself.
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
That chart you made on your PowerPoint don't mean shit to me. Cool paycheck story bro keep complaining and whining about all the injustice, good luck. Hey maybe try a different country if you don't like it, or my point. Police abuse everyone white black or Hispanic, which is all that chart that YOU clearly made, seem to think exist on this world. What about Asians bro? That chart BTW is another great example of reverse racism. Next.
What exactly is "reverse racism"? And how is reversing racism not a GOOD thing?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
are you really this dumb?





that's like a boss promising all of his workers equal pay for equal work, then giving the black employees 50% of what he paid his white employees on payday. then, when the black workers point this out and state that their paychecks matter, the boss turns around and says "hey, all paychecks matter".

so just shut up and stop proving what i already know about you.


Why is the Center for Disease Control keeping tabs on Black folk ?
 

Loudog419

Member
i guess you are too dumb (aka white) to notice the citation at the bottom which states that those statistics were compiled by the CDC.

dumb white people like you make smart white people like me look dumb. stop making white people look dumb, dumbass.
Guess so
 

Loudog419

Member
what? Is it the voices in your head keeping you from reading this? I mean, umm, longer bar means more police violence on that grouping.

Reverse racism? Where in hell did you get that out of this graphic? Is it maybe that you like to get beat and are upset black people get more than you? If so, speak for yourself.
Yes the voices in my head your right
 

Loudog419

Member
#IDK #the real conspiracy is against blacks right? I love it
We are told how hard it is to be black but c Mon being black is way cooler than being white, right?
 
Top