Things the main stream press doesn't want you to know about Romney

Wavels

Well-Known Member
Evil rich guy is required to give to charity or he loses his membership status at church. When you are forced to give. It is no longer charity. Obama gave a bigger percentage of his income to charity and he wasn't obligated to do so
Obama gave FAR less...check the facts before before spouting off drivel please
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
Evil rich guy is required to give to charity or he loses his membership status at church. When you are forced to give. It is no longer charity. Obama gave a bigger percentage of his income to charity and he wasn't obligated to do so
Bullshit. There are plenty of people who don't pay tithing in the church. It is purely voluntary. No one is forced to give anything.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Donations and actions are two different things...good deeds combined with generous charitable giving depicts someone of superior character...IMHO...seems to me that the ogreish Romney is a kind hearted guy.
good deeds like molesting hippies or terrorizing dogs, selling drugged up horses . . condemning MMJ use for others but allowing it for wife

ya real character development there over the years
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
good deeds like molesting hippies or terrorizing dogs, selling drugged up horses . . condemning MMJ use for others but allowing it for wife

ya real character development there over the years
Wait, what? Where did you hear this? Can you give me a link? That's a little tidbit I could find helpful. ;)
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
There is a big difference between giving from the heart and giving for tax shelter/deduction benefits. I think the Lord said something about that when he saw a widow giving all that she could spare. Her gift counted more than all the lavish gifts bestowed by the richest of men. Mark 12: 41-44
BS ALERT!!!!!

LOL liberals only give from the heart, Conservatives only give because its a tax write-off. Nothing says 'I care' more than giving less than the next guy. You know what really says 'I love you and I care'? Giving nothing at all!!!

So full of shit.

What a crock of absolute stinky ass shit!!
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
BS ALERT!!!!!

LOL liberals only give from the heart, Conservatives only give because its a tax write-off. Nothing says 'I care' more than giving less than the next guy. You know what really says 'I love you and I care'? Giving nothing at all!!!

So full of shit.

What a crock of absolute stinky ass shit!!
Finally woke up from your alcohol induced coma I see. You know for someone with a moniker like NoDrama, you sure are a drama queen.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Wait, what? Where did you hear this? Can you give me a link? That's a little tidbit I could find helpful. ;)
the line is alternative medicine to cure MS . . . .. ya right . . if they had a cure for MS we would know it


"She was diagnosed with MS in 1998, became extremely sick, and had trouble walking. However, in 2002 she went into complete remission. She has credited conventional treatments and alternative medicine such as yoga, acupuncture, and reflexology. Ann has also said that her hobby of horseback riding is therapeutic.

im sorry i know people with MS and it doesnt go into remission . . unless on heavy drugs(and the problems at that point don't go away, you just medicate for the symptoms) that work and seeing as she can put a sentence together, id say the conventional treatments is POT, more than likely in its least high form possible


i dont knwo em all, but the MS patients i do knwo all say the same thig . . POT makes it possible to comfortably live, and not much else unless you prefer to be drugged up on horse pills
 

Fungus Gnat

Well-Known Member
BS ALERT!!!!!

LOL liberals only give from the heart, Conservatives only give because its a tax write-off.
I think the difference is most liberals expect the government to do the things that charities do. The reason why government took over is because private charities were largely ineffective during the earlier 20th century. Conservatives hate the government doing it because they want more say in who the money goes to..ie not blacks. Value voters hate it because they use charities for evangelicalism ie listen to a song and sermon for food.

[video=youtube;VwTjeMN0-Dw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwTjeMN0-Dw[/video]
 

beenthere

New Member
good deeds like molesting hippies or terrorizing dogs, Hell that happened 30 years ago, why aren't you bring up the fact Obama ate dogs or admitted to smoking pot then wages an all out war on MMJ? selling drugged up horses . .Dude, were all drugged up! condemning MMJ use for others but allowing it for wife

ya real character development there over the years
The only real character in question here is yours!
 

beenthere

New Member
I think the difference is most liberals expect the government to do the things that charities do. The reason why government took over is because private charities were largely ineffective during the earlier 20th century. Conservatives hate the government doing it because they want more say in who the money goes to..ie not blacks. Value voters hate it because they use charities for evangelicalism ie listen to a song and sermon for food.
And lefties love it cause it's free Obama money!
 

beenthere

New Member
There. Fixed if for you.
Let me ask you something that would involve some real thinking on your part.

You have the opinion that your tax dollars should rightfully go towards more and more social assistance programs and frankly I don't have a problem with that.

I on the other hand, believe my tax dollars should only go to those who truly need it, I want accountability from the people that take my money and redistribute it to others, I want those who abuse the system to be taken off as not to waste my money and take it away from the people who honestly need the help.

So what do you feel gives you the right to mock me for what I want from my tax dollars?
 

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
Let me ask you something that would involve some real thinking on your part.

You have the opinion that your tax dollars should rightfully go towards more and more social assistance programs and frankly I don't have a problem with that.

I on the other hand, believe my tax dollars should only go to those who truly need it, I want accountability from the people that take my money and redistribute it to others, I want those who abuse the system to be taken off as not to waste my money and take it away from the people who honestly need the help.

So what do you feel gives you the right to mock me for what I want from my tax dollars?
Translation: I want the money to go to white people.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Let me ask you something that would involve some real thinking on your part.

You have the opinion that your tax dollars should rightfully go towards more and more social assistance programs and frankly I don't have a problem with that.

I on the other hand, believe my tax dollars should only go to those who truly need it, I want accountability from the people that take my money and redistribute it to others, I want those who abuse the system to be taken off as not to waste my money and take it away from the people who honestly need the help.

So what do you feel gives you the right to mock me for what I want from my tax dollars?
My answer would be that it is because he ran out of valid arguments.

But that begs the question of when he actually had one...
 
Top