the truest words ever spoken in american politics

are you upset?

  • yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%

  • yes

    Votes: 4 80.0%
  • Total voters
    5
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
If all you do is obfuscate in your attempt in answering simple yes or no questions about pedophelia, then I guess you are sympathetic to it and just as guilty of pedophelia for not doing anything, ok cupcake.

And spewing forward that pablum of
Consenting crap makes it worse. Pedophiles use words like consenting in order to justify their disgusting behavior...short eyes!

B4L
Click to expand...



What other people capable of consenting do, is none of my business if it is confined to them. Is it your business to run other peoples lives for them ?

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with pedo lingo or tactics, I bow to your superior knowledge in that area.

I'm also a little tired of this topic, Mr. Teddy Bear. Perhaps you could stand not to talk about boning kids for a little while or only do it when you are confessing to your counselor?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
At least you're not denying you have to drug women to sleep with them. Get it? Cosby drugged girls and slept with them. Hehe. Get it? I am the great cornholio!
Click to expand...
Yes, it was a decent comeback on your part, but a bit off point. You see, I said if her words were intelligible, you weren't doing it right... it meant your penis was too small and she (he?) was still able to form words.

It also was a subtle reference to my gigantic member.

You then turned the tables on me and implied I was a rapist. Damn you're good.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Yes, it was a decent comeback on your part, but a bit off point. You see, I said if her words were intelligible, you weren't doing it right... it meant your penis was too small and she (he?) was still able to form words.

It also was a subtle reference to my gigantic member.

You then turned the tables on me and implied I was a rapist. Damn you're good.
Click to expand...
Rob Roy I can't help you if you just don't say pedophiles are sick individuals. You also need to state that a child cannot consent to sex with an adult. Anything less is crazy
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Rob Roy I can't help you if you just don't say pedophiles are sick individuals. You also need to state that a child cannot consent to sex with an adult. Anything less is crazy
Click to expand...
I don't recall me asking for your help, but thanks anyway.

I believe I've already mentioned a couple of dozen times, that I don't approve of some things other people do.

Of course my disapproval should be no reason for you to cease dressing up in the ladies lingerie that you pilfer from the dryers of your laundromat. It's none of my business how you indulge your fetish.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I don't recall me asking for your help, but thanks anyway.

I believe I've already mentioned a couple of dozen times, that I don't approve of some things other people do.

Of course my disapproval should be no reason for you to cease dressing up in the ladies lingerie that you pilfer from the dryers of your laundromat. It's none of my business how you indulge your fetish.
Click to expand...
you seem to love picturing men you never met in woman clothing. Does the wife know about this ?
All I ask is stop trying to be a wordsmith when it comes to pedophiles and children. That shit is sick and not funny.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you seem to love picturing men you never met in woman clothing. Does the wife know about this ?
All I ask is stop trying to be a wordsmith when it comes to pedophiles and children. That shit is sick and not funny.
Click to expand...
Well, when you're ready to stop talking about it, you will.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Well, when you're ready to stop talking about it, you will.
Click to expand...
you could have ended the talk loooonngggg ago just by saying "pedophiles are sick and a child cannot consent to sex with an adult. Instead you wanted to play with words and walk around the conversation.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
you could have ended the talk loooonngggg ago just by saying "pedophiles are sick and a child cannot consent to sex with an adult. Instead you wanted to play with words and walk around the conversation.
Click to expand...

Well, then I guess we can move onto discussing what consent means in more generic terms, which was my intention, a looooonnnggg time ago when all the games started.

Since we are on the topic of generic consent now...

Would you say in order for something to be legitimate one party shouldn't presume the consent of another person unless the other person has actually provided it?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Well, then I guess we can move onto discussing what consent means in more generic terms, which was my intention, a looooonnnggg time ago when all the games started.

Since we are on the topic of generic consent now...

Would you say in order for something to be legitimate one party shouldn't presume the consent of another person unless the other person is of age to consent?
Click to expand...
fix it for you to remove all bullshit in our conversation on the topic of pedophiles
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Well, then I guess we can move onto discussing what consent means in more generic terms, which was my intention, a looooonnnggg time ago when all the games started.

Since we are on the topic of generic consent now...

Would you say in order for something to be legitimate one party shouldn't presume the consent of another person unless the other person has actually provided it?
Click to expand...
Children cannot consent to sex.
You are not witty, enlightened or profound. You are just an idiot espousing stupid, dangerous and perverted views.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Children cannot consent to sex.
You are not witty, enlightened or profound. You are just an idiot espousing stupid, dangerous and perverted views.
Click to expand...

Speaking of espousing stupid, dangerous and perverted points of view, why would you propose making consensual trade in cannabis a criminal offense, Prohibitionist?
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
fix it for you to remove all bullshit in our conversation on the topic of pedophiles
Click to expand...

So, that seems kind of arbitrary doesn't it?

What if a person had not developed the wherewithal to consent but they had surpassed your magical "age of consent", you are fine with bopping them anyway, because somebody told you it was okay?

Also, what if the person did consent, but was straddling a state line where two different states had two ages of consent and they were legal in only one of the states....would you only put your dick in half way?
 
Last edited:
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Blunted 4 lyfe said:
Nope, you're all over the place with your answers.

You never made shit clear except you keep saying consenting as if that takes care of everything, short eyes! Only a sick fuck would think a 10 year old can consent to sex with an adult!

B4L
Click to expand...
No, I've consistently maintained that all human interactions should be on a voluntary and consensual basis. That's not "all over the place".

I've also consistently said only people capable of consenting can consent. (seems rather obvious doesn't it?)

Therefore if a 10 year old can't consent to your advances, Mr. Teddy Bear, I obviously would say in keeping with my core philosophy you should leave them alone.

Also you seem really keen on going on and on about this stuff.
My discussions of what consent is began as an attempt to reveal the nature of an involuntary government etc. Why you jackals kept going back time and again to the topic of kiddie diddling is beyond me.

I hope you get it out of your system soon, since I'm starting to think you enjoy it and that's a little creepy.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
How would anyone test a kid to see if they've developed the wherewithal to morally consent to something we would normally reserve for adults?
Click to expand...

Good question in a generic way, THANK YOU.

I have said that generally speaking the younger an individual person is the less likely that individual will have developed the wherewithal to know the consequences of their actions. Which when you overlay that idea against legal statute becomes kind of contradictory.

For instance a person is able to "legally kill another person" by being in the military at 17, but yet the wise and noble legislators have deemed that same person incapable of being responsible enough to have a beer or sign a legal contract etc.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Good question in a generic way, THANK YOU.

I have said that generally speaking the younger an individual person is the less likely that individual will have developed the wherewithal to know the consequences of their actions. Which when you overlay that idea against legal statute becomes kind of contradictory.

For instance a person is able to "legally kill another person" by being in the military at 17, but yet the wise and noble legislators have deemed that same person incapable of being responsible enough to have a beer or sign a legal contract etc.
Click to expand...
You didn't answer the question
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
So your argument now is that since teenagers are not allowed to drink alchohol. Adults should legally be able to fuck 13 year olds
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top