Thats your choice.
I am not a Christian either.
I only believe in the texts that Jesus wrote himself.
As for you being able to properly read any of the links that i posted in that amount of time just shows you up as someone who talks and talks and has no real information behind their convictions or opinions.
Someone who glances over a document and then goes bah this is shit,fcuk this crap,and forms an opinion with no knowledge.
The fact that i know full well that we have 90% or so unused brain capacity,an oil that does heal whether you like it or not makes no difference to you at all apparently as i have seen you post exactly the same recommendations of governments for extended and thorough testing before allowing any public or pharma use which basically equals another 20 years of prohibition before even medical users get full and proper support
I think it's rather unfair to call me a liar because i'm a fairly fast reader, and none of those articles was more than about an A4 side, don't you? I am fully trained to analyse scientific publications, as part of the degree I study, so I feel i'm well qualified to express my views.
You also mistake scepticism with refusal to believe. All I require to believe something is evidence, cold, hard evidence - not hearsay, not unreliable historical documents, not speculation.
I don't think that thorough testing before
allowing the use of something, and thorough testing before
recommending the use of it are the same. You seem to have missed the distinction. If people want to go ahead and take something because they think it will benefit them, fair enough - however to recommend this to others who don't know any better, without good evidence, is unethical.
I do believe in free will, unlike some governments, but I also believe that the vast majority of the population do not know how to decide for themselves whether a chemical has pharmaceutical benefits or not. It takes science to discover, collate and explain the evidence, and to check it's all safe for everyone's sake.