Snowden's Travels

gagekko

Well-Known Member
US politicians have warned Russia about helping Snowden elude US authorities - haha....

I'm sure Russia is shaking in their boots:

[video=youtube;wyFbJ_zeywQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyFbJ_zeywQ[/video]
 

echelon1k1

New Member
Who's nation? I'm going to go ahead and DEDUCE that you're talking about the USA? right? You're English, and most Americans talk about USA as if its the only country on the planet, therefore you're clearly talking about usa, Am I right? :mrgreen:
Queen lover hey? Seriously you're pathetic... Do you know who else advocates for abolition of national identity in favour for integrated worldwide government?
 

learning05

Active Member
Funny how the media and many americans are so concerned about snowden's whereabouts instead of Prism + NSA + Congress. He blew a whistle so that we would pay attention to the US's invasion of privacy yet mainstream media has effectively shifted all its focus away from Prism and on the refuge/capture of snowden. We are already losing sight of the reason he chose to blow the whistle in the first place. His refugee shouldn't be as big of a concern for the avg american as is the NSA and its programs.
 

gagekko

Well-Known Member
Funny how the media and many americans are so concerned about snowden's whereabouts instead of Prism + NSA + Congress. He blew a whistle so that we would pay attention to the US's invasion of privacy yet mainstream media has effectively shifted all its focus away from Prism and on the refuge/capture of snowden. We are already losing sight of the reason he chose to blow the whistle in the first place. His refugee shouldn't be as big of a concern for the avg american as is the NSA and its programs.
Word is coming out that he might have much more info than what you see in the news - that's why they want him back so badly.
 

learning05

Active Member
I would imagine the media outlets trying to paint him as a criminal after being charged by the Obama Admin via the espionage act. Regardless of what he still knows...we are certain of PRIMS existence; therefore, the avg American should be concentrating their time on learning its provision and determine whether it is constitutional. Is much easier for the Obama Admin to divert attention away from the NSA then it is for them to release more details about the initiative. All I am saying is we should worry about what is known not what may be known by a single individual. The entire US gov is after him so he obv has merit. I would rather see people investigating Prism then debating Snowdens whereabouts. We can do much more as citizens in legislation then we can as alleged "fugitive" hunters.
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
I would imagine the media outlets trying to paint him as a criminal after being charged by the Obama Admin via the espionage act. Regardless of what he still knows...we are certain of PRIMS existence; therefore, the avg American should be concentrating their time on learning its provision and determine whether it is constitutional. Is much easier for the Obama Admin to divert attention away from the NSA then it is for them to release more details about the initiative. All I am saying is we should worry about what is known not what may be known by a single individual. The entire US gov is after him so he obv has merit. I would rather see people investigating Prism then debating Snowdens whereabouts. We can do much more as citizens in legislation then we can as alleged "fugitive" hunters.

Prism goes back quite a bit already.
Im not surprised the penguin was in on this one.

This issue goes well beyond the American constitution. This is an invasion of the worlds privacy.
I'm willing to bet there have been numerous laws broken on and off American soil.

This has gone far beyond an American concern.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday U.S. congressional leaders he briefed in 2004 on a surveillance program recently disclosed by leaker Edward Snowden supported it, and both Republicans and Democrats wanted to keep it secret.

Cheney said he was directly involved in setting up the program, run by the National Security Agency, or NSA, in the weeks after the 9/11 attacks. He said it has had “phenomenal results” in preventing terrorist attacks.
Cheney did not specify which survelliance program he was referring to. Snowden, a former NSA contractor, is facing espionage charges stemming from his disclosure of U.S. surveillance programs that collect phone records and online data in the name of national security.

“There was a time when it was a very, very close hold. Unfortunately it’s become public,” said Cheney.
He was asked about Snowden’s disclosures at a forum at a Washington think tank on U.S.-Korean affairs. He said the leaks have already caused significant damage to U.S. national security as it had forced the government to declassify information to explain the surveillance program.
“If you tell the enemy how you are reading their mail, it’s going to lessen your capability to do that,” he said.
Cheney, who served as vice president in the George W. Bush administration, said that the way the program was set up, it required presidential approval for anyone outside the agency to be allowed to “read in” to it.
Cheney said he met and briefed congressional leaders — whom he did not identify — about three years after the program started and they were “unanimous” that it should continue.

“I said, ‘Do you think we ought to come back to the Congress in order to get more formal authorization?’ and they said, ‘Absolutely not.’ Everybody, Republican and Democrat, said, ‘Don’t come back up here, it will leak’,” Cheney said.
Cheney expressed concern that a private contractor was able to gain access to the information that Snowden has leaked, and speculated that someone within the NSA was feeding information to him.
Snowden left Hong Kong Sunday for Moscow to avoid extradition to the U.S. His intended destination remains unclear.
While the Obama administration and U.S. lawmakers have decried Snowden’s leaks, free speech advocates have praised him for shedding light on secret surveillance programs in a democratic society.




 

learning05

Active Member
Interesting. So it is a post 9/11 program. Nothing recently implemented but something that evolved. But is its expansion justified? Forget snowden all together. How far is the US public willing to allow the government to go in order to "protect" them from threats. A normal parent doesn't secretly monitor every move or communication their child makes because that would effectively be controlling their lives. How much liberty will we lose for the sake of protection? They claim PRISM's data-collection/storage is only viewed by a few high officials but how can we trust that? How do we know private enterprise and big data doesn't have access to some of this collected data?

Also why would we ever centralize so much data? Its like no one watched Live Free of Die Hard. Centralization is a security risk. What is engineered by humans can be hacked by humans. I don't think we have reached a point in cyber-security where this data can be absolutely considered as safe. Now that awareness is spreading what stops hackers from trying to access this for malicious intents?

Maybe this analogy is to far fetched but the way I see it is like taking the risk of curing all your dried buds in one giant jar. If mold somehow grows you risk compromising the entire harvest. Thus, if PRISM's security checks can be reverse engineered (I believe the potential to do so exists-I may be wrong-but if it doesn't now, I pretty sure someone is slaving away at this very moment to make it happen) which will lead to more threats.

I just don't know if the risk is worth taking for the sake of "protection" against possible threats.


1247383_live_free_or_die_hard.gif

A fire-sale, sayyy whatttt??

Rem how stupid these guys felt after they informed the FBI guy about the centralization of all financial data.

Die-Hard-4-Live-Free-Or-Die-Hard-FBI-Agent-Chuck-Summer-8.jpg
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
There have been multiple attempts at creating programs like these
but as soon as they hit public knowledge they pretty much died.

This program was done in complete secrecy as you can see from Cheney's quotes.
It was extended by Obama thru to 2017.

Bush preyed on the fears and emotions post 9/11 and essentially stripped Americans
and the rest of the world of their privacy rights. They know that the people they claim
to be using this program to protect US citizens from don't even use the service's the gov
is monitoring. They [terrorists] are said to be using darknets which are not indexed and
are hidden from webservices like google, bing, yahoo etc.

Your analogy is spot on, it would be ignorant to think the data is safe.

Obama has proven himself to be pretty extreme, invading sovereign countries (Osama)
200% increase in drone strikes, assassinating American citizens etc.

He has proven untrustworthy, and is looking more like a tyrant then a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

IMO this has nothing to do with catching terrorists.
They [govs] have seen how much information people are freely
putting out on the internet. The like of Myspace/Facebook have people
offering up immense amount of data about their lives, relationships etc.

This allows them to create profiles on anyone who hits the net or uses a cell phone.
 

Pentium

New Member
Snowdens regardless of the country in which the arrest or death, arising from either the United States or the country, is a very difficult problem. I would like to ask, it will induce war?
 

learning05

Active Member
Snowdens regardless of the country in which the arrest or death, arising from either the United States or the country, is a very difficult problem. I would like to ask, it will induce war?
Are you asking if Snowden were to be arrested or killed, will that cause a war? I don't think so...maybe tougher trade sanctions may placed by the US on the countries aiding/haboring him. But even that I am doubtful.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
Are you asking if Snowden were to be arrested or killed, will that cause a war? I don't think so...maybe tougher trade sanctions may placed by the US on the countries aiding/haboring him. But even that I am doubtful.
IMO the flight to Russia was planned. If you look at the CIA's relationship with Moscow over the last year of so it's been rocky to say the least. The Fogle bullshit, Russia naming the agency's Moscow station chief, Arc Electronics and the fishenko espionage case, now snowdens in Russia, too convenient...
 

learning05

Active Member
IMO the flight to Russia was planned. If you look at the CIA's relationship with Moscow over the last year of so it's been rocky to say the least. The Fogle bullshit, Russia naming the agency's Moscow station chief, Arc Electronics and the fishenko espionage case, now snowdens in Russia, too convenient...
I feel like that is the US tactic- and the ignorant media controlled by 5 or so ppl- to paint him as a collaborator with Russia. Like they used to do that during the cold war. Putin even publicly stated that Snowden was never in Russia and legally he wasn't obliged to detain a transit passenger for no crimes committed on Russian soil. Notice how the US media has stopped virtually all air-time of PRISM and their police-state agendas. I am sure if there was a dissenter or whistle-blower who feld Russia or China to the US, we would do that same as Russia as long as the public supported his cause.

IMO the Obama Admin has handled this entire situation terribly. Even tough Obama himself has yet to take action he has told all other political officials to do things for him. Like did you hear McCain's press statement? He was so arrogant/ignorant in his speech as he bashed Russian Putin. And Chareles Edwards and that whole Homeland tampering of evidence. The Obama admin clearly doesn't care about violating due process.

But overall Assange, Snowden, and other whistle-blowers shouldn't be crucified for their actions. Even tho they did in fact break laws for revealing confidential information, their actions were to make sure our government which operates like a business doesn't overstep their boundaries. Every watchman needs a watcher. Power corrupts people/administrations; therefore, I view Snowden revelations essential for human rights and privacy law.

Also lets be real, the US police state is expanding way to fast. Some one is profitting off of this expansion. I guarantee it is not all for the public good. Follow the money...
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Some very important questions are not being asked by our media over this, or if they have asked, the answers have not gotten any play.

How many other 20something private contract workers have this type of clearance. Could we have stopped the terrorists we claim to have stopped and still followed the constitution by getting warrants? Are they using any voice recognition software in conjunction with PRISM.

As far as what Snowden has done since leaving the US I chalk it all up to self-preservation.
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
You know in a way, the entire world has been changed irrevocably with the knowledge that everyone is being watched or listened to. It has, or should have changed the way we think about communication, really knowing now that whatever we say and do, can be, and is being observed by someone like Snowden. This is new world that has come to light, and it is sort of scary. I know now, which before I had suspected, that I really should be more careful about my Yahoo posts, or what I order online. I probably am considered a threat to national security and someone that must have a big garden. Welcome to the future.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
Protect Whistleblowers: Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled as they have been during the Bush administration. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. I will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government
http://change.gov/agenda/ethics_agenda/
 

echelon1k1

New Member
Obama has claimed many things pre-election and has done the opposite. But in all fairness it is not the man in the chair who has the real ability. In order to maintain his seat he needs to sell his soul to those with funding money. The true enemies of the world are often in financial and banking sectors. Their desire for greed knows no bounds.
I posted an article a while back by an ex-cia guy stating Obama's scared of being assassinated by the CIA, which is why he won't reign in the cowboys who've gone off the reservation... Don't know how much truth there is to it, but, my family in the US has been involved with intelligence agencies and his opinion is Obama has a great disdain for the military and the agency, but knows he is dwarfed by it's immense history and tentacles...
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
I posted an article a while back by an ex-cia guy stating Obama's scared of being assassinated by the CIA, which is why he won't reign in the cowboys who've gone off the reservation... Don't know how much truth there is to it, but, my family in the US has been involved with intelligence agencies and his opinion is Obama has a great disdain for the military and the agency, but knows he is dwarfed by it's immense history and tentacles...
I would counter that it is his job to assume that risk. He wanted the job, twice, and is obligated to do the right things despite that threat. Jmo. cn
 
Top