Ron Paul is taking back the GOP for Americans

munch box

Well-Known Member
People underestimate michelle. She is intelligent, quick whitted, and will not be caught off guard easily.I expect she'll go far in the primarys. I have looked into her backround and found it all very intresting. If she get the nominee, she will definatly have my support. But when Sarah palin jumps in the race its going to be touph to choose, because I'm going to wanna run a 3way.Like em both . they are conservative enouph for me. But Ron Paul's cool I guess. I would vote for him...
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
People underestimate michelle. She is intelligent, quick whitted, and will not be caught off guard easily.I expect she'll go far in the primarys. I have looked into her backround and found it all very intresting. If she get the nominee, she will definatly have my support. But when Sarah palin jumps in the race its going to be touph to choose, because I'm going to wanna run a 3way.Like em both . they are conservative enouph for me. But Ron Paul's cool I guess. I would vote for him...
Okayyyy. Can you explain for which views you would support Michelle Bachmann? What about RP makes him "cool?" How about Palin? Just curious.
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
I am going to support any GOP candidate. I don't have anything bad to say about any of them. And Karl Rove needs to just keep his mouth shut. Because we don't need the person going up against tyranny to look bad. Its important that whoever it is has a strong backround. The Obama Administration has made it very clear they intend on running a smear campaign. they even said it.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
I kind of figured you'd say something like that.

You need to know this: majority of the republican candidates this election are not going up against what you label the "tyranny." You have Rick Perry who is for forced vaccinations of teenage girls. You have Rick Santorum who wants nothing more than to lead us into war with Iran. You have Michelle Bachmann who has pledged to use the power of federal government to ban abortion, gay marriage, and porn. Herman Cain might be the most indecisive candidate I've ever seen, but add into account the fact that he is pro torture, pro bailouts, pro corporate welfare, and is a former deputy chief chairman for a branch of the Federal Reserve Bank. Finally, you have Mitt Romney:
A company called W Spann LLC, formed on March 15th, has dissolved shortly after making a $1 million contribution on April 28th to Restore Our Future, a committee organized in support of GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney. According to corporate records obtained by NBC News, the business was formed by Boston-based lawyer Cameron Casey who, as she notes in her online bio on her employer’s website, specializes in “comprehensive estate planning advice to high-net-worth individuals and families.”
The company was dissolved on July 12th, two weeks before Restore Our Future made its first campaign filing. A spokesperson for Ropes & Gray, the law firm for which Casey works, told NBC News that “the firm won’t be making any comment on this matter at this time.” Also noteworthy: Rope & Gray represents Bain Capital, an investment firm formerly headed by Romney.
Adding to the mystery is the fact that the company’s purported address in midtown Manhattan has no records of such a tenant.



I know I'm missing some but I got lazy. I think I get my point across here.

 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Well then I choose Sarah Palin.
Oh, you mean the one who isn't running for president (not yet anyway)? The one who spent $100,000 in one outfit for a campaign rally in '08? The same Palin who is against marijuana legalization despite having admitted to smoking marijuana in the past? This Palin:

  • Tragic mistake to allow mosque near Ground Zero. (Nov 2010)
  • Economic sanctions on North Korea for nukes. (Oct 2008)
  • Terrorists in Iraq are the biggest threat to Americans today. (Oct 2008)
  • Fight terrorism to spread democratic ideals in world. (Sep 2008)
  • Any country that houses Islamic terrorists is a danger to US. (Sep 2008)
  • Focus on fighting Al-Qaeda terrorists, not on reading rights. (Sep 2008)
  • Proclaim “Loyalty Day” to reaffirm loyalty to America. (Apr 2007)
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
I think she will give the states back thier rights. Marijuana will still be legal for medicianl use. She just doesn't want it in schools and stuff. And unless she bought that dress with tax payer money I don't have a problem with it. Thats her business. And I think its "patriots day" not loyalty.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
I think she will give the states back thier rights. Marijuana will still be legal for medicianl use. She just doesn't want it in schools and stuff. And unless she bought that dress with tax payer money I don't have a problem with it. Thats her business. And I think its "patriots day" not loyalty.
She bought it with RNC campaign money.

Look, I'm not really trying to drive you away from these candidates. The reason for posting this is you have demonstrated that you don't really look at them through a microscope, but you absolutely should. Voting for just any Republican, because it's not Obama is exactly the thing that is destroying our country.
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
She bought it with RNC campaign money.

Look, I'm not really trying to drive you away from these candidates. The reason for posting this is you have demonstrated that you don't really look at them through a microscope, but you absolutely should. Voting for just any Republican, because it's not Obama is exactly the thing that is destroying our country.
EXACTLY, this is not a fight between dem and rep. this is a battle between good and evil, and ron paul is champion of the good, no one else will do.
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
ok fine harry reid nancy palosi and oboma are all working as a team to destroy our country. hows that?
LETS SEE, attempting to exponentially increase the national debt, increasing our international police policy, signing us up for continued patriot act, continuing the "terror threat" BS to keep us all scared little sheep, attempting to undermine our constitution with federally mandated socialized healthcare or more specifically creating government penalties for not purchasing a product.
 

Prefontaine

Well-Known Member
ok i watched it. ya you were right its funny
but do you see his point? why is ron paul the only candidate being ignored when he is a front runner? the only answer is that the media's controllin interests want anyone but ron paul, cause DR. Paul cannot be controlled.
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
but do you see his point? why is ron paul the only candidate being ignored when he is a front runner? the only answer is that the media's controllin interests want anyone but ron paul, cause DR. Paul cannot be controlled.
STFU. how could I miss the point. Him being ignored was mostly all John Stuart was talking about. If Ron Paul gets the nominee, he will have my 100% support.
 

PetFlora

Well-Known Member
Take the Rep Party back? lol They're equally corrupt, just in different ways

If he was smart he would go back to being a Libertarian. That way he could get the disgruntled votes from BOTH sides
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
The Straw poll is a fundraiser. Ron Paul spent the most money for the best booth at the little side show. It was a bidding war and RP bid the highest amount for that specific booth. RP also handed out a few thousand $30 ballots for free to people to use in the poll. You would be gravely mistaken to put any weight behind that bought and paid for 'poll' that is nothing but a fund raiser. Just a word of caution.

What the results show is the people who handed out the most $30 ballots for free did the best in the poll. Go fucking figure huh?
so you wont vote for ron paul just because he a republican? I don't understand people
 
Top